THE USA MUST DEMAND GREENLAND IN EXCHANGE FOR GIVING UKRAINE TO THE EU.
this does 2 things.
1.) Provides a justification to actually get involved.
2.) Brings isolationists on board.
3.) Prevents the eurocucks from taking advantage of the USA.
4.) Gives the USA a long lusted after piece of clay.
Thus, as part of the deal to defend ukraine from russia and allow its eventual entry into NATO and EU, the USA must be given greenland.
discuss.
THE USA MUST DEMAND GREENLAND IN EXCHANGE FOR GIVING UKRAINE TO THE EU
You neglected to mention the best part
>finally positions us to where we fully encircle the canucks, thereby making annexation of our long lost arctic clay and water simply a matter of time
Greenland is rightfully danish clay.
you think so
who the fuck cares about greenland
Greenland has always been American. You just occupied it first, not unlike the North American Abbo and the elusive Hawaiian Islands Abbo. Why don't you ask Chief Shitting Bull and Johnny Pipiwai-O'Toole how the "b-b-but I was first!" argument worked for them. When we are mandated land by God himself, it doesn't matter who was there first.
and thus the day of the rake is one step closer.
also, it gives the USA complete power over access to the arctic circle.
not even the greenlanders want you. europe is a museum.
You live in New Zealand, so of course you wouldn't care about an American island being withheld from America. But for Americans, this is an egregious affront to our sovereignty.
Who cares? Y'all gonna be brown and speak spanish in less than 50 years kek
Here's an idea why doesn't USA fuck right off out of the affairs of other countries that aren't USA and stop fucking pretending to be the worlds police. Fuck off and mind your own business.
we're gonna take baja too, cockfag.
>Greenland
We can do all our farming there. And make sunny beach resorts.
Because?
yeah, then we get another communist state and pair of senators and electoral votes, and yeah we don't need that, unless expelling the current occupants is part of the deal.
>withheld
did you lose a war to seal fuckers this time?
its a rural state, user. they'll be red, just like alaska
I agree with this cunt.
There is potential for Greenland to be a shipping port in the summer for pacific freight.
Greenland won't have the requisite population to be a state for centuries user.
America has never lost a war. We even won Vietnam and Afghanistan, because the goal of those wars was to destabilize the region, demoralize Americans, deplete our resources, and make a lot of money for Jews and the military industrial complex. Those were the only terms for victory, and they were all met. Why don't you ask Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Cuba, the Virgin Islands, Hawaii, the American south, the British, and Mexico how often we "lose wars" in the name of expanding America.
Here's an idea: why don't you ausfag sissies hide from the online world in shame until you grow a pair of nuts?
>America has never lost a war
Lol
>Lol
That's got to be the most brilliant argument I've ever seen from a nonwhite flag.
Being concise is a great quality
By the way, why did you leave 80 billion USD in military equipment in Afghanistan?
>too illiterate to read one paragraph beyond the first five words
>"being concise"
Cope harder brownskin.
>By the way, why did you leave 80 billion USD in military equipment in Afghanistan?
It was a term for victory. The regime's goal was to humiliate and demoralize Americans. That term for victory was met. There was never a term for victory of "annex Afghanistan" or "kill all the Afghans". If those had been the terms, they would have been met. What happened instead was several thousand young white Americans died, dope dealers got filthy rich committing genocide on our soil, and arms dealers made a fortune. Those points were the entire mission statement for Afghanistan, and they all happened. Once we decide to take what's ours, nobody is going to put up any resistance, because we're going to get the land whether the abbos live free or die for their slavery on the battlefield.
Chk
The equipment was left for the color revolution in Kazakhstan
>a pair of nuts
Talking about nuts: personally I don't think you have balls to start a conflict with a near-peer adversary. Why:
There was a thing called "Budapest Memorandum" where Ukraine agreed to abandon its nuclear arsenal in exchange for guarantees of the country's territorial integrity from Russia AND USA. Fast forward, 2014, Russia annexed Crimea (a clear violation of this provision) and started civil war in Donbass (another clear violation). USA didn't do jack shit.
Which failed
>The regime's goal was to humiliate and demoralize Americans. That term for victory was met
Why do you tolerate this attitude? You are the most armed nation on the planet, the democrats stole 2020s elections and you sucked it up. You guys are all bark, no bite.
why do you want greenland? to fill it with niggers
This high-dose copium is dangerous user
>you didn't defend some grey wasteland on the other side of the world, therefore your entire history of winning every war you ever fought isn't real anymore
What is a "near-peer"? Do you really think those exist? Have you ever actually compared the specs of our equipment vs. everyone else's? Have you compared the validity of our cause to the batshit insanity of everyone else? When America wants new land, WE HAVE NEVER LOST. Get that through your incredibly dense brown skull.
Again, all bark, no bite. Instead of boasting you could send troops to Ukraine at least this time, but you refuse.