Redpill me on the Civil War

What was all the fuss about?

Attached: Screenshot (53).png (1037x826, 590.08K)

European population of US fighting over whether or not jews could own niggers as property. Jews ended up winning the war despite losing their property.

Abolitionists worshipped niggers and wanted them to be free
Confederates understood niggers can only be enslaved

southerners are such mutts

The reason for the war was the secession of the southern states from the United States. The secession was instigated primarily by anxieties about slavery and abolition, however the literal reason for the war was secession.

When someone says the war was about slavery, they are wrong. After all, several slave states fought with the Union. The war was about secession.

Men on both sides fought bravely for what they thought were Nobel ideals;in the end it was all for jewish business

Attached: 7bec66ee5114999eff50da7c7be92b383e5c1112b881a520572de713fb34b72a_1.jpg (640x479, 47.44K)

If the reason for secession was fear over the perceived inevitability of abolition of slavery, doesn't that mean the root cause of war was slavery?

The primary reason why the South Revolution failed was due to logistics. We can't repeat the mistake. Logistics comes first, ask any military veteran what should take precedence - tactics, or logistics. When we have complete and total control of our own logistics, I do believe an opportunity will present itself to right the wrongs of history. When we get back the CSA and the Golden Circle, I want to right the wrongs of all history.

Attached: 1556309397405.png (666x437, 301.96K)

States rights

No, only the immediate cause counts. For example, the Vietnam war was fought because of attacks on US ships

Started 20-ish years earlier about taxes, not slavery.

Logistics and numbers. They were far outnumbered.

No, because the war was not declared over slavery. Union troops did not invade the south to free the slaves. In fact, the idea was repugnant to many

Lincoln only said he'd free slaves during the war because he needed bodies

North was full of faggy nigger lovers and jews. They continued to exploit the south, hit them with ridiculous tariffs and taxes, and constantly disrespecting them. The south says fuck you we're leaving. Nigger lover's get mad. War ensues. After the war the nigger lover's then further destroyed the south with reconstruction by not allowing southern white's to vote or uphold the law. Then they installed their freed pet niggers as the government their to wreak havoc on the southerners. Blacks would rape white women or commit crimes and nothing would be done about it. Finally the Klan formed and put nigs back in their place. Decades later the nigger lover's did the same thing again by cucking southern states from having their own sovereignty ending segregation and forcefully ushering in "Civil Rights"

> The primary reason why the South Revolution failed was due to logistics.
Not true. Lee made tactical errors at Gettysburg that cost him the war. If he had been aggressive on day 1 and taken the hills, then the Army of the Potomac was absolutely fucked and would have been destroyed. Washington DC would have been without an army to defend it, and Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia would have marched on DC and placed Lincoln under arrest

Attached: 1F070B98-5664-42E4-8B2C-6B8C09882853.jpg (472x851, 91.7K)

*there before some yankee nigger lover complains

Alleged attacks on U.S. ships*

cool it with the antisemitism

Lincoln attempted to defeat the kikes and was killed for it.

It's revisionist history to say it was solely about slavery. Slavery was on its way out and even the leaders of the South knew it. British textile plantations in India undercut the cotton market and made slavery financially untenable. So long term, the slaves would have been freed anyway.

The real reason is because the northern states just unilaterally elected Lincoln while the Southern states voted universally against him. Southern states viewed it as an existential threat that the northern states could dictate who was president. It's the same mentality as Democrats wanting California and New York to decide who is president today, while ignoring the other 48 states. Couple that with the fact people were vastly more loyal to their states than to a federal government back then, and there you go. The South did not want a dictator. Which of course Lincoln turned out to be, as he jailed tens of thousands of detractors and protest leaders without trials via military raids. Read "American Bastille" for details.