What the fuck does he want from ukraine guys?

what the fuck does he want from ukraine guys?

Attached: ec5b0362-9e9e-4242-905c-419a502ca362.jpg (700x818, 165.29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5uWEaKLzwUg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Georgian_War
youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

More security in the case he needs to
fight China

some deep politics shit that is not apparent to us

youtube.com/watch?v=5uWEaKLzwUg

Russians like having buffer zones since they have no natural geographic defenses (at least on that side of the country).

Also probably just to fuck with the US.

A puffer zone to NATO

And I think it's about the principle
The west can't make a colorful revolution in a Russian partner country and then let them join in NATO to advance their encirclement of Russia

The question should be
Wtf does the Dirty west in Ukraine

To stop NATO from spreading and control of Black Sea I think

He wants to refresh the genepool of his country with actual white people. Such a shame he won't succeed though, this isn't the first invasive horde Ukraine had to fight off.

Attached: image_2022-02-05_204843.png (640x636, 341.95K)

Look at a map with terrain. Russia must take the Ukraine if it wants defensible borders in the long term, which is exactly the same reason globohomo doesn’t want them to take Ukraine, and has propped it up as a hedge against Russia from the start.

get american influance out ofit.

simpel.

Nothing.
If you havent figured out Ukraine crisis is complete psyop by now ngmi

he wants NATO to not be there. by the way, the donbas region is not a valuable piece of real estate. the population is old, and consumes more tax revenue than they produce. after the CIA Nazi coup, the donbas region had a vote over whether they wanted to be part of Ukraine or Russia, and they voted in favor of Russia, but Putin refused to annex the region

Lebensraum.

Attached: Frederik_Paulsen_junior,_2011_(cropped).jpg (1281x1813, 2.45M)

Have you ever played Europa Universalis 4? If you are a smaller nation, a strategy to prevent invasion is keep a lesser country bordering between you and your adversary.
A great example of this is Ethiopia. Ethiopia has fast expansion, but two big bad guys on its horizon to reconquering Coptic (a sect of Christianity) religious sites. Those two bad guys are Mamluks (Egypt/Jersualem muslims) and Ottomans (Turks). So while you expand, you keep a shitty nation bordering between you and Mamluks, until you are ready for the big duel. If you border them, they will want your territory, assess your weakness, and attack. However, if you ally the shitty nation, guarantee it, you may prevent war for a time.

In modern times, NATO promised the Soviet Union it would not expand NATO east. Yes, this is a long time ago, but NATO expansion can be seen as aggression because it is easy to stage a false flag and it is obvious both the Soviets and Americans are/were good at making excuses for war.
In 2008 Ukraine and Georgia were very close to joining NATO, surrounding Russia with what has been the sole superpower since the 1990s.
Here is where people don't understand old Vlad. 1) everyone in the west has a bias to western diplomacy. This is one reason people didn't get Trump. If you look at North Korea, China, Iran, they are using military flexing to show their strength. They are NOT using this Obama tier charisma to woo their opponents in a 'rational' and pleasant discussion. Russia obviously isn't playing this western game of diplomacy either.

They have said they will not tolerate NATO at their borders. This is like the meme people post where they say, "look, Iran or China wants war with the US, look how close their borders are with our US military bases. Russia obviously doesn't want this because it means missiles can be placed right at their border.
Putin has said if these border countries attempt to join, he will sow as much discord as to wreck the countries.

Attached: IranWantsWar (2).jpg (1080x992, 203.09K)

He's just collecting shekels. Frig off goy

Attached: 1642713828437m.jpg (694x1024, 104.61K)

this

>what the fuck does he want from ukraine guys?

A buffer zone to keep NATO niggers at bay.

Expand definite Russian territory (Donbass, russian minorities, etc),

and secure a buffer zone via a weakened ukraine.

he wants to keep ukraine independent.

Look at the example in Georgia after 2008.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Georgian_War
The best solution out of this scenario is to keep Ukraine as a buffer between NATO and Russia.
Ukraine is also deeply corrupted. Russia is too (and US), but US has interests in it with the Biden son being tied to a gas company there. My point here though is Ukraine is a country that could easily become a failed state like those drawn in sikes-pikot agreement in middle east since the country is slavic, but split upon different cultural lines that could easily split into part russia or into two new countries. Where this corruption causes an issue though is tied to Russia's nord stream 2 pipeline to the rest of Europe since most of Europe doesn't have an easy pathway for fuel (look at their gas prices).

I don't think Vladimir has ambitions to bring back old Russian borders, because the countries economy really sucks. Its less than Canada, and less than Texas. This is just a guy that doesn't play the West's games of diplomacy and is flexing in their best way, the military to have diplomacy.
You could argue he is a vintage character in a new time period, that many do not understand. You could say that with a lot of the boomer candidates we have clinging to power (including greatest gen). Look at Hillary, Trump, Biden. Trump, Bush jr. and Bill Clinton are all within a year of the same age. Suffice, the guy is like Robert E. Lee in a way, whom by modern standards is not seen to be the greatest commander. He was a master at Napoleonic tactics, which made him a great commander, but there were other commanders like stonewall and another i've forgotten using modern military strategy that would have been cutting edge at the time since Napoleonic tactics by the 1860s were old hat, as you can see by people studying Civil War tactics to adapt to WW1 after since it was one of the most recent big wars

Here is a good video on the topic:
youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4

Attached: 1643417257895.jpg (2500x1870, 1.27M)

Nobody that has lurked Any Forums even for a few months can be this geopolitically illiterate
OP is a faggot