Why did Germans really lost the war? Would it have been different if Hitler let generals take control over strategy?

He attacked as defense reaction because it was the Soviets who prepared their units in the frontier, if don't were for Hitler they would have conquered more than half Europe if not all, and the half they conquered at the end couldn't be maintained and provoque strong nationalist resistance thanks to Hitler too

>Why did Germans really lost the war?
Geography, Logistics, Personnel management skills.

>Would it have been different if Hitler let generals take control over strategy?
The Generals largely DID control strategy, the push to Moscow was their idea after all, while Hitler wanted to go to the oil fields in the Caucuses, they only later in their memoirs blamed Hitler for every bad military decision while making themselves out to be good military decision makers par excellance.
But it wouldn't matter who directed Germany's war effort, since it was a war they were always going to lose.

He could have conquered Britain at the beginning if not we're for wrong info from Canaris too, read the Otto Skozerny book explain this better, even Churchill admitted that

Good question, they had Thule/Vril with their Aldebaran/Orion friends and Tibetan psychics on their side, they're supposedly the only ones with reverse engineered Vimanas and shit but they still somehow managed to lose. I thought ayyy lmaos are insta win? Are those lies huh?

They had about a 10% chance if they pursued the "naval" strategy that Raedar advocated, the minute they decided to go all in for an attack on Russia and not to push to the Middle East the war was lost.

>don't take in Italy
>don't wage war on three fronts
>don't declare war on USA
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW, how hard was it not to do all of that?

Invading across the channel without air and naval superiority is an incredible bitch.

I guess if they were smart they would have tried to assassinate Dowding (who was too smart to get the British air force destroyed) and hope some big wing guy took over the RAF.

In the autumn/winter 41 (first year of in the eastern front offensive) it was raining so much, whole Russia became a gigantic swamp and all the heavy machinery got stuck.

The Germans are inferior race.

No. The odds were just stacked too heavily against Germany.

Between the massive an untouchable industrial base of the US and the unending hoards of the Soviets and the machinations of the Jews Germany was doomed before the war even started.

Germany had no capabilities to make a successful naval invasion of Great Britain

The declaration of war on the US is stupid and maybe what Japan did could have kept the US out for a long time... but Roosevelt's military buildup was to eventually to attack Germany.

Hitler prettymuch guaranteed war when he broke the Munich agreement.

Should have kept going to Moscow

No. They didn't. They did not have enough ship tonnage. And getting enough would require an additional decade of buildup.
The British tried wargaming that scenario in 1974 at Sandhurst, giving the Germans the most boons as possible while handicapping Britian as much as possible to give Germany the best possible scenario. Which is: the Germans landed... then they all quickly died on the island without accomplishing anything.

You can read about it in the book "Sprawling Wargames: Multiplayer Wargaming" by Paddy Griffith, who directed the scenario. Or you can read about it a bit here: web.archive.org/web/20180410110911/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/paddygriffith/other.htm

>Why did Germans really lost the war?
They did?

No I'm not talking about invading Britain directly in 1940 that would not have worked, I mean going all in to try to get to the Iranian oil.

>t. retarded esl
Many people say Hitler micromanaged the campaigns instead of giving free hand to his generals