Occasionally, I see a historylet say that German was winning WW1 until jews started a communist revolt. This is not true. By October 1918, the Entente were advancing on all fronts. General Ludendorff was the one who approached the Keizer and asked him to seek peace because he knew that Germany was losing the war.
Bulgaria had surrendered after resounding defeats. German ally Turkey was completely defeated and retreating from the Levant, and sought peace almost immediately afterward. Then Austro-Hungary collapsed and surrendered. Leaving Germany totally alone in the war, while her armies were in full retreat on the Western Front. That was the context for the communist revolts, which were joined by a mutiny of the German navy and elements of the army as well. The king himself abdicated and then fled the country. The people were starving and there was a fuel shortage with winter approaching. It's no wonder that there was a communist revolt in Germany, especially after Berlin funded the communist revolution in Russia.
Germany lost WW1. Continuing to fight after this late hour would lead to the destruction of Germany as a state. As Bismarck once said, it was better to surrender while they still had an army to fight the communists.
Jews back stabbed Germany for Balfour declaration. Fed info to their boy General Sir John Monash (Gerry Jew from Oz), Monash became supreme allied commander by end of war.
Jews supported the Entente in the war. But that doesn't change the fact that Germany had totally lost it by November. Also, America entered the war in response to the idiotic German attempt to get Mexico, a country in the midst of a civil war, to attack America.
Isaac Hall
>on all fronts >the entente We won the Russian front The only front open to the Germans was France They never stepped foot in Deutschland We didn't need to surrender and lose territory They gerrymandered on ethnic lines to steal Danzig and parts of Prussia.
Elijah Green
You realize Germany was fighting every empire in Europe plus the US at that point?
Look at the map. Germany was in full retreat on every front. They were retreating from the Balkans. They were leaving Bulgaria, which had surrendered. Austro-Hungary was in full collapse. They were retreating from Belgium and the Hindenburg line had collapsed. They occupied a huge amount of land in the East which was slipping into uncontrollably civil war.
The invention of the tank in 1917 turned the tide of the war. The Ottoman Empire was also suffering defeats towards the end of that year. America's entry into the war the same year expedited Germany's surrender, but probably only by a matter of months. They didn't even participate in battle until May 1918
Aaron Sanchez
the treaty of versailes caused ww2 jus look at how much land germany and czeck lost
Joshua Davis
>hurr we just teamed up with everyone else to destroy Germany Yoo killed the strongest part of the white race you fucking tgraitors.
Connor Torres
Yep, after the war some of the German leaders clung to the stab-in-the-back myth as an excuse for their failures in having let Germany get sucked into the war and then having failed to win it. The reality was, Germany was simply militarily beaten by autumn 1918. There had been no major subversion on the home front.
Jaxon Ross
And China fought the 8 great powers of the world during the Boxer Rebellion.
War sometimes turns into a one sided rape.
Nathan Howard
>Be Germany >Fight a 2v1 on the Western Front >Fight a 2v2 on the Eastern front >A-H is fighting on the Balkans and the Italian Front >Russia is defeated >Romania is defeated >Serbia is defeated >Italy crippled with Caporetto >France on the brink of defeat >Ameriniggers declare war in 1917 >CP is defeated. The Central Powers were winning until mutts decided to attack for the kike overlords.
>Yoo killed the strongest part of the white race you fucking tgraitors. Strongest part of our race? Who teamed up with Turks to wage war on Europe, and then you lost. You wouldn't need to seethe so hard if you had just not gone to war.
What kind of retard starts an unwinnable war?
Henry Lewis
>The Central Powers were winning until mutts decided to attack So America single handily won the war, eh? Amazing. If America is so strong, why antagonize the country?
In any case, Germany had totally lost the war by 1918 and surrender was their only realistic option.
Hudson Flores
would you say that germany fought a total war in ww1? >captcha war8h
Christopher Perez
>Who teamed up with Turks to wage war on Europe France (Ottoman-Habsburg wars) The France and Bongistan (Crimean war) >So America single handily won the war You didn't win shit you nigger. Same as in WWII, you coward fucks waited until Europe bled out, then attacked. By yourself, you can't even defeat barefooted rice farmers, or goat herders, Germany would have beaten the living shit out of you in 1914.
True, but it doesn't change the obvious fact that jews started a communist revolt.
Jordan White
>rapes Belgium >births communism into a nation for the first time >meat grinds millions of whites in the western front, a war of aggression
>How could the Americans do this?
Germs also were the first to impose harsh economic treaties on the losers 9f a war. The precedent was set during the Franco Prussian war with the Treaty of Frankfurt.
Hunter Wilson
Yes.
And then Germany and Austria-Hungary (WW1) Your point? >You didn't win shit you nigger. And yet you crafted a tale that Germany was winning the war up until America entered, and then suddenly the CP were defeated. Read your own post, nigger. >Same as in WWII, you coward fucks waited until Europe bled out, then attacked. If that's the case, then it was absolutely retarded for Europe to go to war with itself.
>By yourself, you can't even defeat barefooted rice farmers, or goat herders, Germany would have beaten the living shit out of you in 1914. MY DAD COULD BEAT UP YOUR DAD!!!!! In seriousness, Germany had no way of reaching the USA in either war, while America could strike at any German colony at any time.
Xavier Adams
They tried a few times but it was after the November 1918 armistice that ended the war, not before it, so those attempts played no role in losing Germany the war.
Jordan Hall
france split up a empire/country twice in ww1, who cares about some border town
Camden Flores
WW1>WW2
Gabriel Butler
>Yes. then how come germany surrendered before allied troops even touched german soil? how come that military casualties were way lower than in ww2, when the war was a total one?
Henry Wood
>who cares about Danzig?
Apparently any loss of clay is very important to the autists of the world and Europe should be in perpetual war claiming historical territories
Gavin Baker
>Occasionally, I see a historylet say that German was winning WW1 until jews started a communist revolt.
Here's what happened. >there are strikes in early 1918 most led by socialists or spartacists, (Spartacists are the German equivalent of Bolsheviks, very heavily jewish.) >US enters the war >Germany starts to lose >Germany signs Armistice >Germany erupts into revolutions >Many of those revolutionaries are Spartacists >Spartacists and socialists seize certain regions including Bavaria and Berlin >Jewish socialists rule Bavaria before they are ousted by the Freikorps >now no one trusts jews in Bavaria
And that's the origin of the Nazi Party which originated in Bavaria. >It's no wonder that there was a communist revolt in Germany, The communist revolt was called by socialists including many jews >As Bismarck once said, it was better to surrender while they still had an army to fight the communists. They did have the army necessary to fight the communists/jews which is why the war was over in months. The US ended the war, and it would have been at least a draw without US intervention, which ultimately occurred because Wilson was a Zionist and a globalist. Jews starting revolutions was not the only greianvce Germans had with jews, the other was the fact they were all celebrating after the loss because the US and Britain established Israel while Germany was broken up. Keep in mind Jews had been on Germany's side when the war started, but switched shortly before Germany defeated Russia.
Christopher Stewart
>freedman speech
Charles Howard
Danzig was an important port town and Germany's link to Eastern Prussia it was vital to Germany's presence in the Baltic.
Easton Turner
Strikes were understandable given that people were working in the factories 12 hours a day to support the war effort while the country was under Allied blockade and there were shortages of various things, meanwhile the high-level aristocrats who had let the country get sucked into the war and had then failed to win it kept on living in luxury. And yet there were no strikes that significantly impacted the war effort. German home front morale on the whole stayed intact until the very end, it is just that the military could no longer hold on.
Liam Hall
>would have beaten the living shit out of you in 1914. stfu, you (AH) lost to serbian goat shagers, than cryed river, and waited for 1 year for grmans,bulgars attack serbia, you are not worth country to have
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_campaign >The Serbian campaign was the series of campaigns launched against Serbia at the beginning of the First World War. The first campaign began after Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia on 28 July 1914. The campaign to "punish" Serbia, under the command of Austrian Oskar Potiorek, ended after three unsuccessful Austro-Hungarian invasion attempts were repelled by the Serbians and their Montenegrin allies. Serbia's defeat of the Austro-Hungarian invasion of 1914 ranks as one of the great upsets of modern military history.
>The second campaign was launched, under German command, almost a year later, on 6 October 1915, when Bulgarian, Austrian, and German forces, led by Field Marshall August von Mackensen, invaded Serbia from three sides, pre-empting the Allied advance from Salonica to help Serbia.
Does a total war mean that you cannot surrender when you realize that the war is lost? If that's the case, there have been very few total wars in history. If Germany continued to fight on, they would have experienced what Russia did. The Entente would invade Germany from the west and soon from the south. The Poles would then revolt and the east would blend into the Russian Civil War. Germany's navy was already in mutiny and the army would begin to evaporate. This would allow the communists to revolt and possibly seize Berlin. The entire country would disintegrate. And the longer the war went on, the harsher the peace terms would be.
>The communist revolt was called by socialists including many jews That's what socialists do, user. They revolt. At least that's what they used to do before they all became liberals.
>, which ultimately occurred because Wilson was a Zionist and a globalist. The war was a direct result of the German attempt to get Mexico to declare war on the USA. Jews helped, but why would a country not respond to a hostile act like that when they stood nothing to lose from doing so?
Jose Nelson
Reading threads like this it is absolutely clear that the white race lost with the german loss of WW1. Americans are nothing but golems. Plenty of people said it at the time. It only gets reenforced with every passing year.
Ian Parker
There is no doubt that they were losing by the time they surrendered, and likely would've lost given the circumstances. Especially growing (((tensions))) on the homefront. They (goverment officials and high ranking military) had the Kaiser abdicate, but were initially fixing on continuing the war. They believed that the abdication (Kaiser didn't like Jews) would ease the homefront, and angreed that Wilson's 14 points were too much to allow. Unfortunately the homefront (((situation))) didn't improve, leading them to attempt a sort of "peace with honor", wherein they surrender in a position that they could've kept the war going , hoping to show a sense of "mercy". What they didn't realize was that Wilson and France were out for blood, and that no amount of "honor", superficial or otherwise, would spare them one of the most aggresively unjust "treaties" of all time.
Benjamin Wilson
>white race lost with the german loss of WW1 white race lost with the german starting of WW1 every fucking bad thing in europe has started from germany
Benjamin Sanders
> the white race lost with the german loss of WW1 Germany was not pro-White ideologically anymore than America was. They were pro-German. Why do you expect Americans to bend over backwards to appease you when you would never do the same for other White people?
