How can other nations ever compete?
American Military Might
>Spend our own money improving our country while the Amerimutts spend billions to protect us from China
Pretty sweet deal I gotta say
most of that american money gets wasted lmao, soon you will see throwing more money doesn't always lead to the best results. with less money other militaries are quickly becoming technologically and practically superior
Call us mutts one more time and we'll drop a million of these on your country.
Of course we protect our vassal states
Most of those is spent on upkeeping bases and the rest is buying overpriced equipment which is perfect to launder money.
America cant even go to war, if its not a third world shithole. Going to war sgainst russia or china would tank the economy in 10 seconds. Then you have bigger problems like cities being looted and burning because people being robbed of their last dollar and clothes of their back.
There wont be a world war because everyone loses.
We did a pretty good job of fucking you guys up Germanbro, did you forget?
The only money russia and china need to spend are whatever they need to pay the taliban to acquire all the new gear biden left them
We're really good at destroying, however, we're horrible at nation-building.
>trusting americans
Ya dun goofed
worse than a tsar bomb
imagine being proud of stopping the last chance of Europeans to survive and thrive
How can illiterate goat farmers in Afghanistan even compete?
I would love to see this happen to our enemies. Millions of Jamals and Tyrones just descend from the sky. Within a decade, the country will be destroyed. lolz...
Looking just at ner expenditure will give you a pretty poor idea of actual military capability. You have to take cost of production, training, and doctrine into account.
For example, how much does it cost to produce 1 tank of equal quality in the US vs in Russia or China? It is the same reason large companies move their manufacturing overseas. Materials and personell cost more in the US. So right off the bat, an equally powerful military would be far cheaper in amother countries.
Perhaps even more important is doctrine. The US is focused on global power projection. Having carrier groups and the ability to strike anywhere on earth is useful but extremelt expensive. The logistics alone are likelt larger than Russia and China's entire budgets. This means Russia and China could not conventionally attack the US while the US could attack Russia or China. However, it also means the US would struggle to bring its full power to force. The US spends ALOT on logistics that Russia and China simply do not want or need to effectively defend themselves.
Not to mention the Us has been doing that for at least a century if not longer.
Large scale military spending (especially for r&d) started during the civil war and has steadily increased especially after ww2
america is a zombie held up by liberals and military
it crashes
Hello it's me, reality, the money goes into Jews pocket, not really into the army
>Niggers in the military
There’s no way you can win
Shut up red cross faggot, shouldn’t you be doing a blood drive or something?
Since when did the red cross become a nation anyways?
Australia alots a similar portion of GDP to military, I think even more? Other than that I’m not sure how the US budget translates to armed might. Too much corruption and too expensive programs.
It’s incredible that Russia has a GDP closer to Canada than the USA, yet they field a military that could probably beat America, at least in a defensive war.
That US military budget is a *massive* pile of pork. I’ll be 80% of it is pure fat. Conservatively.
Jesus, stop embarrassing yourself you fat fucking joke.
making the most of your flag? baffles me there's people like you who ignore numbers in preference of le epic vidya game roosians cyka blyat!!!
and what a favor you did the world with that
The American empire openly loathes and discriminates against its most productive population.
All that China or Russia or whoever needs to do to defeat America is sit back and wait.
nukes go brrrrr
lol all dead
Unfortunately we should have joined them
The only difference is that the US had better helicopters to pluck people off the Embassy roof this time
why should we ?
most of that might is dispersed to keep global trade open, so youre doing others work FOR FREE
They don't.
They just let the US spend the money. Why should Russia for example compete, when they still have more nukes and aren't in the business of projecting power to the other end of the world.
The only ones somewhat butthurt here are the Chinese as the US fleet is a real problem for their ambitions. But US hasn't really considered scaling up their presence in the Pacific for real
A lot of it is adapting to war doctrine. We've been in American pax Romana and a new world War would bring a new tactic that initially we will suck at. You can see in ww1 the sick men of Europe failing to adapt in Austro Hungary and Ottomans. Italy.
May send in all the 200 lb and under troops, and then realizing the others are incapable due to weight start a robot race.
It's not as crazy as it sounds because china also has a rapidly aging population that won't be fit to fight in a decade or two.
Sorry sir
This means that someone is stealing a lot of money. that's all.
It's related to how America spends the most on infrastructure but its infrastructure is always crumbling. And yes, America's infrastructure is crumbling. Don't be a faggot and claim otherwise. There's a reason why 'Make America Great Again' and 'Build Back Better' are campaign slogans.