Are socialists wrong about birthrates?

Are socialists wrong about birthrates?

Attached: 2.jpg (500x500, 108.45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

justine-s-writes.medium.com/birth-strike-how-the-predecessors-of-antifa-laid-the-foundations-for-abortion-in-america-5c147c7670dd
youtube.com/watch?v=XbFKC3xySMw
youtube.com/watch?v=5l8uy_U8bmA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's easier to count the things they're right about.
Yes birthrates are inversely correlated to the strength of feminism in a society.
So if there were historical feminist societies, it's very likely that they removed themselves from the meme pool.

the left can't meme

I recommend taking a look at the Philippines and their shockingly high birth rates. They have maternity hospitals there where young women who are only 25 are on their 8th or 9th kid and the hospitals can barely stay open because no one pays the bills. They even try to keep them prisoner in the hospitals until they pay.

That's a country with a lot of Spanish Catholic influence and so brith control is something that doesn't exist to them.

Education about birth control, specifically, is what I attribute it to.

prove its women only & not both genders.

what do they say about em?
bc if you think socialists are trads youre extremely wrong.
in fact, theyre the opposite.
and they promote feminizm, as in gender equality.

and i dont mean only now.
historically, gommunizm/sochializm is all about "creating the new man"

I hope so. Ancient Rome probably collapsed cause of their degenracy and lack of discipline ancient northern tribes set in stone.

pol is wrong, again.
The primary driver of low birth rates is you don't need kids to take care of you if you have daddy government to do it for you. Same reason marriage is almost no existent in Europe.

Attached: 1643999854705.jpg (1344x816, 90.1K)

In a society where women are expected to compete against men and work full time, a society which affords ZERO opportunity for citizens to make time to reproduce at healthy ages.

African women are right to start reproducing at younger ages than their European counterparts, because that is the natural time that a woman is supposed to be bearing children. The problem with Africans is they have too many children die to lack of education, birth control, or frankly anything better to be doing with their time.

Europeans are right to be having only 1-2 kids, but they suffer under economic demands that force them to wait until they are in their late 30's to even start considering having children. The West needs a wholesale reevaluation of the purpose of the economy (to support happy loves of the citizens, not to simply generate "GDP").

It's not that people aren't having kids, everyone I know besides the losers on here has kids. People are only having one or two. My fucking grandpa had 12 siblings, my mom had 6 siblings and my mom has 2 sons. Anytime I've told a girl or one of my guy friends that I want to have 6 or 7 kids they all act like I'm mentally ill, it's completely unheard of to these people outside niggers birthing 20 kids for the WIC checks.

>marriage is almost no existent in Europe.

Attached: mutt.jpg (234x250, 8.94K)

Attached: 1644000341977.webm (640x360, 1.1M)

You have to be literally retarded in 2022 if you're so fucking stupid you fetishize university as this big brained thing. I was smarter than my fucking professors and every faggot on that campus. Even now I can walk up to the local university and listen to dipshit stupids talk about how everything is racism. You are quite literally an uneducated buffoon high off the crack of "but I have a degree". Your degree is toilet paper.

Also

Attached: 1644000524119.jpg (592x341, 36.37K)

70% of men who are 30 are unmarried. "People I know" is such an absurdly retarded selection, I assume you work for garbage disposal. But at least your retarded kid will grow up to clean up dogshit like his dad.

Belgium data BTW

>stupids

I meant students, but I guess my opinion got ahead of me.

No its because the women are being taught how to be men instead of how to be housewives.

>It's easier to count the things they're right about.
/thread

BTW, when I'm saying pol is wrong here:
I'm referring to zero IQ posts like:

It should be a known FACT that the ideological predecessors of Antifa (anarcho-syndicalists) were the first ones to push for mass abortion and contraception as part of plan to destroy capitalism through destroying the birthrate. This call for a "birth strike" was carried over to the American communist party and the ACLU.

justine-s-writes.medium.com/birth-strike-how-the-predecessors-of-antifa-laid-the-foundations-for-abortion-in-america-5c147c7670dd
>[P]rocreation under capitalism was an abomination since it prolonged the system by creating more “wage slaves”for capitalist bosses. In their view no one should have any children under capitalism. The agenda was to have working-class women drastically reduce the number of births via contraception and abortion. The lower birthrates would dry up the pool of labor, which would then ensure imminent crisis for capitalism and imperialism. This applied the syndicalist call for a massive general strike to the realm of childbearing.

>They erroneously believed this strategy would empower working-class women and the working class as a whole. Women would supposedly be “freed” from household labor. Workers’ wages would supposedly increase as the birthrate shrunk, since the absence of a reserve army of labor would force capitalist bosses to give into workers’ demands. Deliberately reducing the population would also give workers bargaining power with the State, these anarchists alleged.

This is because the left is inherently satanic. Unlike God, Satan cannot create, he can only destroy. This causes Satan to become deeply jealous of God, and as such Satan seeks to destroy all that God has created. The left likewise cannot create, it can only destroy, and seeks to tear down and annihilate everything which Western Civilization and free markets have made.

This is precisely why communists seek to destroy the family. Leftists hate everything beautiful and fertile.
youtube.com/watch?v=XbFKC3xySMw

Attached: 20211016brthstrk.png (712x1448, 682.51K)

yes. our finest.
picrel.
sneed nigger

nice.
now do america

qde : you sneed in the countryside
in the meadows
in the bogs
>sneed be in the lawd for the lawd sneed hath given

Attached: tranny-us-mil-front.jpg (1024x576, 108.94K)

This is wrong.

In ancient times people had to have kids, it was basically a requirement to survive even if they didn't actually want them.

Now only people who want kids will go through the struggles of having them while people who don't want them will choose not to.

And as we know, preferences are heavily genetic.

So what's really happening isn't society dying, but all the people who aren't naturally fecund are being boiled out of the gene pool.

Give it enough generations and people will self select into a society of super breeders. Assuming they don't get destroyed by nigger rape first.

Fuck this app, I meant

America also has social security, and the birth rate is only high for immigrants and Mormon pluralist cucks

What’s wrong with not wanting to breed the boss more wagecucks?

No they are 100% correct. Feminism is genocide.

That's not what's going to happen. You'll end up with niggers and white flight

Birth strike is literal child sacrifice for the sake of socialism.

This was planned from the start.

youtube.com/watch?v=5l8uy_U8bmA

>Europeans are right to be having only 1-2 kids
It is never right to be under replacement levels due to the potential of outbreaks killing a sizable number of your population, as well as war

Name a war which moved the needle

>The West needs a wholesale reevaluation of the purpose of the economy (to support happy loves of the citizens, not to simply generate "GDP").
Wanting the economy to work this way for the people instead of solely for the banker elites is antisemitic. You will never have this wish as long as there are Jews in the west.

We are moving quickly into a post-work society where AI and robots will destroy the ability of many people to earn good livings. Besides that, human population is just too high, which drives interpersonal conflict over resources (see: cost of housing), as well as polluting the environment with human waste and garbage, and just making us all miserable because there are too many damn people around. Have you ever been to a theme park and said to yourself "gee, I'm glad it's so crowded today!" or been driving and said to yourself "you know what this trip needs? More traffic!"

We simply don't like being around so many people, and declining birth rates SHOULD be seen as a good thing except that all the WRONG PEOPLE are having all the kids. THAT'S the problem.