LOCKDOWNS ONLY REDUCED COVID DEATHS BY 0.2 PERCENT-JOHN HOPKINS STUDY (REPOSTED)

HAHAHAHAHAH
I BET YOU FEEL SOOO CLEVER NOW, LOCKDOWN FAGS
TWO YEARS OF LIFE DOWN THE DRAIN
COUNTLESS SUICIDES, BROKEN MARRIAGES AND HOMELESS BROS
THE ABSOLUTE EXTINCTION OF YOUR RIGHTS AND YOUR FIGHTING SPIRIT
AND THE FULL BLOWN KNOWLEDGE THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL FUCK YOU IN THE ASS AND YOU WILL TAKE IT
AND FOR WHAT???
FOR WHAT???
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
>OH NONONO, IT HASNT BEEN QUEER REVIEWED
CONFRONT THE DATA, NIGGER

Attached: you asked for this.jpg (1638x2048, 394.86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/virus-linked-hunger-tied-to-10000-child-deaths-each-month/2020/07/27/84d349ca-d059-11ea-826b-cc394d824e35_story.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

So you don’t care about the 0.2% lives saved?

did you miss the
>COUNTLESS SUICIDES, BROKEN MARRIAGES AND HOMELESS BROS
retard????
there was a cost to those old, sick, 0.2%

The statistics take that into consideration dumbfuck, 0.2% means it’s a net positive. We saved lives, go dilate.

>While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.
can you not even read the first page before you start spouting off bullshit you disingenuous cunt?

>Virus-linked hunger tied to 10,000 child deaths each month

So. How many people did they kill?

washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/virus-linked-hunger-tied-to-10000-child-deaths-each-month/2020/07/27/84d349ca-d059-11ea-826b-cc394d824e35_story.html

No they don't, jew boy

For the lazy:

>Of those 34 eligible studies, 24 qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
They were separated into three groups: lockdown stringency index studies, shelter-in-placeorder (SIPO) studies, and specific NPI studies. An analysis of each of these three groups support the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality. More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only
reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average. SIPOs were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific NPI studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.

>While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.

Damit. Well...