Predictive programming hints from Albert Bourla on where this is headed:
>21:55 Bourla: "We will control within, say, the next 10 years this virus. I believe it will continue to be present because it spread everywhere, and because both natural infection and vaccinations seems to produce not-very-durable immune protection, so it will be coming again and again."
>"But we can have it perfectly controlled, that's my message. Perfectly controlled. We can have, hopefully with an annual re-vaccination, and with pills available, and with our ability to stay constantly ahead of the virus, because we can produce very fast, because we can make the newest version, version 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 of the vaccine, that will be more and more effective as the virus mutates, that we will have perfectly normal life, with just injection maybe once a year, and a pill that in case we are sick will help us, make it flu-like, or like other non-life-threatening disease."
>CNBC: "'Perfectly normal lives.' that is what we're hoping to get back to. Albert, thanks for being with us this morning."
>9:05 Bourla: "The current COVID vaccines do not have the safety profile we had hoped we could achieve with this technology."
>10:20 "With lipid nano-particle technology . . . you can produce DNA not through biological means, which is how we do it right now when we are working for example with our vaccines against COVID, but with chemical, enzymatic."
>"This means that you can reduce the time of producing a very (sensitive?) part of the overall manufacturing process of RNA vaccines from almost a month to a couple of days. That would cut dramatically, potentially, even further our ability to have new variant vaccines, if needed, instead of 3 months into 2. That will produce dramatic benefits for our fight against COVID and other diseases, like flu, for example, because they will allow you to be very, very close to the time the new variants circulate."
>11:30 CNBC: "What is your expectation in terms of whether we're going to see an update to that vaccine? We just spoke with Stéphane Bancel from Moderna who suggested really the focus is on the fall for figuring out the right strains for then. But of course we're already seeing Israel give fourth booster doses."
>Bourla: "We're working very actively on an omicron-specific vaccine as a booster. That should be in the clinic very soon."
Easton Gonzalez
>12:25 CNBC: "What do you think the future holds in terms of when we'll be getting the next boosters and what those boosters are going to contain?"
>Bourla: "I would say that the future is clearly predictable right now. We are doing everything we can so that we can stay ahead of the virus. I don't know if there is a need for a fourth booster. That's something that needs to be tested. I know that Israel already started some of these experiments, and we will conduct also some of these experiments to make sure that if it's needed, we'll use it. I don't think we should do anything that's not needed."
>"Also, we are working on a new version of our vaccine, a version that will be effective against omicron, as well. The hope is that we will achieve something that will have way, way better protection, particularly against infections, because the protection against the hospitalizations and the severe diseases it is (unreasonable?) right now with the current vaccines as long as you are having the third dose. These vaccines will be ready in March. I don't know if we will need it. I don't know if and how it will be used. But we'll be ready. In fact, we are already starting manufacturing, so if there is a need for the vaccine, then we will have some immediately, because there are a lot of governments that would like to see it immediately."
>"And, clearly, also the pill, right? Right now, this is where most of the effort of most of the governments is moving. They are all placing orders and are discussing right now about stockpiling. We are waiting eagerly to see the results that are circulating in real world data."
Tyler Perez
>15:38 CNBC: "Albert, I'm curious how you think about, given the number of breakthrough cases that we're seeing with omicron, whether you think that's going to suppress the public's appetite longer-term for boosters over time?"
>Bourla: "I think this is a real risk. There is always the element of people could get tired. I believe this situation has unfortunately, not fortunately, but unfortunately, formed two camps, two different mindsets. There is a mindset that they're very fanatic, that they don't want vaccine, and there's a mindset of other people that they want maximum protection. So I believe in the element, in this section of the people, that they do believe in the value of the vaccine. The people that want maximum protection, I think they will follow, at large, the instruction of the healthcare authorities, and their physician."
>"The other camp, which is very skeptical, I think they will remain skeptical, and for them, unfortunately, the solution only will be the pill if they get disease."
>"And then there is in-between, which is the number of people, which can go one way or another, and this is where education needs to help."
Carson Hill
I push the syringe into my arms It's the only thing that slowly stops the ache But it's made of all the jabs I have to take Jesus, it never ends, it clots its way inside If the clot goes on, I'm still gonna take it!
yeah, just like that wasn't the fucking plan all along
Brandon Rogers
by the time omicron booster comer everyone will already have immunity to it but leftists will still inject themselves. I wonder what reason they'll give for that decision
Parker Parker
Remember: they have shit for brains. Think of leftists like you think of 5 year old yourself. Their critical thinking, connecting dots ability, cautiousness and so on are just like those of a 5 year old you, user.
