All of your right wing politics are destroyed by the simple by the fact that aesthetics and ethics are subjective and...

All of your right wing politics are destroyed by the simple by the fact that aesthetics and ethics are subjective and no one can prove anything objectively. No one can objectively say that Bach is more beautiful than The Beatles or The Beatles are more beautiful than The Kinks just like one can't say why murder is objectively bad. Everything is subjective.

Attached: burger.jpg (1400x1400, 137.1K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>politics = aesthetics
thats extremely retarded.
pls stop posting here

Not everything. Youre just fags.

Attached: PhotoGrid_Site_1636942897904.jpg (2048x1643, 305.1K)

Nobody cares about your faggot retard thread you stupid nigger

>aesthetics and ethics are subjective and no one can prove anything objectively
You have to be 18 to post here.

Right wing politics are based on aesthetics and ethics both of which are subjective

No.

>1 post by this ID

What does this prove?

Oooooooooooommmmmmyyyyygaaaaaaaawwwwwddd
It’s beautiful

You guys are going to cope and adhom the entire thread because you know your opinions are meaningless

I just want that burger I could eat 2 of those

Murder is onjectively bad because it removes a person's experience of time, and the opportunity for that person to bargain with the universe for gain.

Prove it

This person is right, except it's exactly why the right wing view is the winning one. The left thinks that because aesthetics are arbitrary, that they're not needed or that none are better than other. This is retarded, because humans obviously prefer some things over other things, like beauty, creativity, glory, over other things like ugliness, pettiness, and weakness. The left is this retarded and doomed to fail because they fail to envision a world anyone wants to live in.

oh so now aesthetics = ethics
wow.
youre profoundly retarded
why the fuck did i even engage you?

This is exactly my view. I made this thread but I consider myself on the right. This is contrary to the normal right wing view that what I personally believed is objectively true and everyone is wrong even though I can't prove it which is just retarded

Don't lie to me you will gladly eat a portion of the picrel

>CRAWWWWWWLING IIIIIN MY SKIIIIIN

Subjectivity is the bastion of the postmodern atheist and nihilist. When you find God (you won't because God has abandoned kikes) then you will find responsibility, and objectivity, and ultimately you will find true reality.

Do you not speak good English? What I'm saying is not confusing. The right wing place a value on aesthetics and ethics in the ideology. The is a normal view even on this board.

It is impossible to find two Theists who agree with each other. Even in God there is no objectivity.

Obviously I meant this post for faggot OP but whatever.

Babbys first philosophy class

This applies just as much to your politics as it does to anybody else's. All you've done is taken the nihilismpill

>no one can prove anything objectively
stay retarded lol

Attached: 1379555165595.jpg (719x429, 83.79K)

All of your left wing politics are destroyed by the simple by the fact that aesthetics and ethics are subjective and no one can prove anything objectively. No one can objectively say that Bach is more beautiful than The Beatles or The Beatles are more beautiful than The Kinks just like one can't say why murder is objectively bad. Everything is subjective.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics

you absolute fucking retard
you know shit and only from hearing.
its so fucking obnoxious

Do you even not speak good English?

>It is impossible to find two Theists who agree with each other.
This is literally the single worst fucking pulpil I have ever heard in my life holy FUCK I am sitting currently in a room with at least 3 theists who agree about everything. Get a life you fucking loser.

I agree entirely but I acknowledge it and say my beliefs are arbitrary. That's all I'm asking of everyone is not cope and realize it's all subjective but we can still work the subjective. Acting like you know the objective truth is just childish and makes us look stupid

Your opinions are equally meaningless

Then why post bait and act like an unaesthetic Jew? Just say it. It's obviously true that the right wing is the only one that lends credence to the inherent value of aesthetics and narrative (even if some of its adherents aren't aware of this). The other political factions completely neglect this - they're inherently materialist and "man cannot subsist on bread alone" or something. They need a reason, a story, a striving, a world worth being in. This is the inevitability of the far right, in the inexorable decay of all other systems that will fold in and consume themselves in their ever more frantic search for meaning in a world that they have stripped of it.

>everything is subjective

So genociding leftists is fine. I like you.

Attached: 1635858537761.png (312x300, 247.28K)

Then go kill someone and we will see how subjective prison is for you

No, the beatles were faggots, you trust chemicals in your brain to tell you that they are chemicals. All knowledge is ultimately based upon that which we can not prove. Will you fight or perish like a dog?

No, you're a spineless limp dicked faggot who can't accept the fact that objective truths exist just because they go against your shitty subjective worldviews

Attached: flip.png (692x630, 307.06K)

economic laws are NOT subjective. ofc you have no idea what I'm speaking of because there is no leftist economic theory besides shooting everyone who disagrees. kys.

Holy shit check me you faggots

>Right-wing politics is generally defined by support of the view that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable.
So objective
>natural law
Objective
>Tradition
Including traditional art (which is aesthetics)

If you go even deeper into actual political ideologies on Wikipedia like traditional conservatism you get things like

>Traditionalists defend classical Western civilization and value an education informed by the texts of the Roman and Medieval eras. Similarly, traditionalists are classicists who revere high culture in all of its manifestations (e.g. literature, music, architecture, art and theatre).

Start from the Greeks, you absolute brainlet.

I say it in this way because it's the simplest way to get people to understand their position makes no sense

>your subjective opinion is irrelevant
for you

Attached: 1641881256134.jpg (1080x1373, 361.61K)

>ethics are subjective
murder is objectively wrong. Put 2 people in a room, one wants to murder the other doesn't want to be murdered. Both people can not simultaneously achieve their goals therefore murder is immoral.
use this template for anything to decide if it's ethical or not. It is an objective moral guide to any ethical situation

Can you prove some of those objective truths in aesthetics and ethics for me please.

trips of truth

idiot
go jump off the empire state building, you know , its subjective, you decide on the outcome

Morality without a deontological grounding is fucking pointless
I could just kill you and be justified in the fact that I am superior to little faggots and little faggots therefore need to be exterminated. Would be a funny but unproductive way to run society

I said ethics and aesthetics only. I'm not a postmodernist

There are people on every side that think they have objective truth. It is not a right or left thing.

Why is achieving a goal objectively moral?

Is your claim that aesthetics and ethics are only subjective objectively true or just your subjective opinion?

Even deontological grounding is subjective. You can't say something is objectively true because you made a subjective standard. If this was the case anyone can make any standard and say their also objectively correct

Then you don't understand aesthetics. A belief in a pure, unadulterated, highest Truth, is aesthetic. It's what deism is. It's God. All aesthetics hinge upon the hypothetical unknowable deeper totality of reality. it's the paradox of Faith. You don't need to fight it. You're ouroboros-ing yourself.

>put an employee with a ceo in a room
>one wants a living wage, the other one does not want to provide it
>paying a living wage is immoral

I can objectively shoot you and you'd be objectively dead. We will objectively ignore your dipshit philosophy and objectively hunt down the rest of you.

This is true but it's way more extreme on the right.

its just about who should become multi-planetary.

no dumb fucks.

kind regards
the universe.

Attached: 1642577752901.jpg (500x326, 13.42K)