This animated furry movie seemed way less degenerate than others. Is it based? What are the political implications of this? No porn glowies.
Sing 2 based?
Other urls found in this thread:
out.com
twitter.com
they accurate depict the singer/voice actors with there animal counterparts
however it's serverly pozzed with the sub plot
How exactly is it less degenerate? Explain the details
Which subplot is pozzed? The little guy has a homo thing for his boss. Not great. But it's in a comical/pathetic context
That's kinda it as far as I could tell.
Very little overtly homo content. Mostly pretty wholesome. Compare this to Lion King where Scar is overtly homo. Lion King 2 homo also but I can't describe exactly how. Zootopia definitely very gay. I guess maybe the Illumination animation studio is just better. You can see by user online ratings that normies aren't upset by homo content also.
Movie critics also giving movie negative reviews in contrast to positive audience reviews. This is probably due to movie not being homo enough.
Bump
Post porn of the hot wolf girl
picrel
>Very little overtly homo content
That's your problem. You compromise for 'little' homosexuality even when it's a kids movie
No glowie porn go away
But I have 6 posts by Id
I'm an American Indian user. You realize how bad homo is here right.
The fact you even had to respond to it confirms you suck cocks, glownigger.
I also point out that pretty much all of the sexualization in the movie is of female characters.
You're just upset I invoked the no porn clause of your shill contract with Satan and since you have no creativity and can't post gay furry porn you don't know what to do.
>American Indian
Horseshit, you can I both know you got a dot in the middle of your fuckin forehead
>I'm an American, Indian user.
Ok giga brainlet
Stop derailing the thread and talk about the political implications of furry movies on our society. Can animation studios like Illumination put a damper on the funny animal cartoon to hardcore gay porn pipeline that Disney has perfected?
>literally a gay furry raccoon tranny
>not degenerate
that's a lynx you moron
Scar is gay? (pls no bully)
She's just a streetwise lynx or something. No tranny.
No, there was a deleted scene where he tried to fuck Nala but it was kinda too dark for a kids film to have the older king that committed regicide to use his power and authority to rape a younger female.
Uh death to all furries regardless of political affiliation and such. Also you will never be a real woman or fish or whatever the fuck
No this is what you look like
Considered gay icon by some. Obviously gay in my opinion. Here's article.
"The New Scar Is Not Gay — And That’s Okay" out.com
Lion King 2 Is way gayer, but I don't understand why exactly
t. jacks off to catgirls
kill all weebs lol
We're going to reach a singularity of irony one day. Too many layers. Collapsing on itself.
Also the young woman who wrote Beastars manga/anime idolizes Scar and she put ton of gay shit in that manga.
The lion and tiger are definitely the hottest characters
>Homo
>Not pozzed
If there is a even a hint of LGBT crap then it is 100% pozzed
>350k subscribers
We need to go back, just dismantle everything and go back
Catch up with the time, old man. Its not the 50's anymore
They aren't sexualized at all. The most sexualized one is the mother pig who primarily is depicted as sexually appealing to her husband.
I don't give a fuck about the female characters user
>Catch up with the time, old man. Its not the 50's anymore
They all have bizzare body proportions and are not sexualized at all. They look like mutants more than furries honestly.
Man-made horrors beyond your comprehension
No we need go forward and faster
Funny/pathetic gay side character vs hardcore gay porn. OK Boomer. Your kids probably a gay furry and you are in denial.
Where are the ears, god these character designs suck
> T.
I have both Sings, I really enjoyed them.
Checkd but I'm not ready for Brazilmerica in 2050
But your predilections are not objective reality.