Meta (Facebook) joined COPA (Crypto Open Patent Alliance) to steal Craig Wright’s (Satoshi Nakamoto’s) intellectual property (patents) on Bitcoin (BSV), alongside Jack Dorsey (Twitter, Square, etc.)
Why are ((they))) so afraid? Who will win? Can you just petiton a court to make someone’s patents unenforceable because you want to make money off of it?
What are the technocrats up to? Why did (((Zuck))) steal Craig Wright’s Metanet and turn Facebook into Meta? What are the political implications of a group of tech megacorps attacking a single individual (via nChain)?
Craig Wright is based. This video shows why Zuck and Jack and everyone are so afraid of him. what he is building will destroy their whole control system. It is all about who controls the metaverse
>Can you just petiton a court to make someone’s patents unenforceable because you want to make money off of it? A little oversimplified but the answer is yes and it’s even more blatant with respect to trademarks Big money kikes always win under the current system
The problem is that patents shouldn't last more than a year maximum. After that, it should be free for anyone to use. The main benefit from a person patenting an "idea" or "creation" is that they should get social recognition. Such social recognition comes with numerous benefits like job opportunities that pay higher salaries from organizations wanting your talent, your intellectual creativity. A creative mind isn't a one trick pony.
We live in a world where if a person patents something, then corporations will buy/steal the patent in order to shelve it or establish a monopoly. Any gained economic efficiency from the concept behind patents is lost from this monopolization. The monopolization actually nerfs handicaps the advancement of technology, many which are life saving.
There are numerous examples throughout history to current day where this is true.
Usury is limited to the economic realm. If people want to end world Jewry or what can be described as a perversion of humanity, then they need to support social recognition over economic recognition and back policies that push social recognition as being superior in fostering/nurturing actual culture.
Trademarks I understand. They’re more easily contestable because common terms are common to all people. “Paper towel Co.” is likely unenforceable since it’s a general use term in the industry
Same with others. There’s like a thousand “Dick’s sporting goods” in the country because a lot of people are named Dick
Kayden Edwards
Right, but what I’m talking about specifically is that if you get the first Dick’s up, and another guy copies you but his gets more popular, a court might give him the trademark use for free instead of having him pay you royalties to use the name. They’ve done the same on patents before even though it’s a more difficult sell. With something like blockchain tech that very few judges understand, the odds of this happening are high
Jeremiah Myers
Craig Wright is Satoshi the same amount that Charles Hoskinson created Ethereum, which is to say not at all. These men are both glowies hired for the same purpose, to destabilize and delegitimize the 2 leading crypto projects in the market. They even ran the same script for both of them. >claim to be there at the founding for Charles, this part is actually verifiable, but after BTC im sure the glowies were wise to the importance of it and shoehorned him in >big eccentric personality who attention whores the fact that they are the true creator >many of their claims are demonstrably false, but some of them are true >start a competing crypto project that on the surface appears legit but is revealed to be vaporware if you do any digging(BSV, ADA) >this competing crypto project inexplicably skyrockets in price to hold a top 10 position for a period of time despite nobody using the platform >both of these men are insanely wealthy and publicly flaunt it as much as possible to maintain the appearance of legitimatcy They are basically the same person, it’s insane to me that anyone could be fooled by this plan despite it playing out twice identically in front of them.
