Is World War 3 overdue?
Is World War 3 overdue?
Julian Thompson
Gabriel Powell
no it's never overdue because it will be the last war. Nothing will remain after. I for one hope for peace.
Ryder Ross
You live in Denmark
James Morales
Lol
Anthony Russell
Yes
Mason Walker
WW2 never ended
Brandon Powell
good morning sir im a poor little programmer, will u accept me in ur country pls sers
Jose Howard
True. Russia and Japan never sign a treaty of peace.
Angel Hughes
OP
The Russian military buildup along Ukraine might be:
1) Preparation for an invasion;
2) "Banging on drums" to get stuff: see North Korea launching rockets into the ocean in exchange for rice; or,
3) A diversion.
Number 3 is interesting because it leads to a follow-up question:
"Diversion from what...?"
See image.
A diversion for Russia reinforcing their position in Syria.
Consider the implications if Moscow and their ally in Tehran acquire control from Syria to Iran. China is also significant here because China is an ally of both states.
Many folks have observed Russia going into Ukraine will be a serious risk; and one which Putin might not be willing to take. Too much loss of life and for what? He already has Crimea. But in Syria, his position there needs reinforcing.
In recent weeks, Israel has bombed the Syrian port of Latakia;
Russia then reinforces the port of Latakia;
Now Iran just docked a "cargo ship" in the port of Latakia.
So imagine your Putin in Moscow, and you're looking at your position in Syria, and you're wondering:
"How can I reinforce my military in Syria without raising too much attention to the move?"
Create a diversion in Ukraine, perhaps?
Note: there are numerous news media reports on those Russian military ships in the Mediterranean, and have read many of them, and each of them *speculates* that Russia is sending those ships to Crimea.
But here's a question:
Why would Russia send military ships from their northern ports, all the way to the Black Sea, just to move some land military hardware?
Here's the key:
---> Those Russian ships in the Mediterranean are amphibious/transport ships!
Why would Russia send land military hardware in boats from their north to their southern positions, when they can just send them over land?
... maybe it's because those amphibious/transport ships are going to the Syrian port of Latakia?
Matthew Edwards
>---> Those Russian ships in the Mediterranean are amphibious/transport ships!
What is inside those amphibious/transport ships?
See image.
Found that one from Twitter (obviously).
Notice the tweet says "60 tanks", and who knows what else...
Now just speculating here, do not have proof, but folks should know within a few hours or a day or so, whether or not that Russian fleet in the Mediterranean is going to the Black Sea, or Syria.
Austin Gutierrez
Good morning sir
Blake Taylor
am i shadow banned?
am i shadow banned?
Christopher Butler
>Now Iran just docked a "cargo ship" in the port of Latakia.
See image.
Have confirmed that Iranian ship has docked in Syria now.
Grayson Jones
niggers sneed and feed my anus
>soon
Colton Nguyen
It's due by 2025; according to Ezra Pound's observation of 80yr socio-economic cycles.
Lucas Perry
(You)
Benjamin Moore
>Have confirmed that Iranian ship has docked in Syria now.
See image.
The Iranian "Parnia" has docked at the Russian controlled Syrian port of Latakia.
Note: Iran + Russia.
Tyler Carter
Yep we could argue ww2 still going just the faction s have changed.
Brayden Johnson
>Note: Iran + Russia.
See image.
Moscow and Tehran recently were discussing a 20 year draft deal where Moscow sells Iran missile defense equipment and fighter jets.
This issue is incredibly serious: Russia + Iran is real now.
Jordan Davis
>80 year cycle
>1945 was 80 years ago
what?
Levi Adams
>Russia + Iran is real now.
Note Russia recently jamming air traffic in Israel.
Russia is picking a fight with Israel via Syria!
Juan Peterson
oops
>ezra
most telling spell
James Young
>Russia is picking a fight with Israel via Syria!
Another one.
See image.
Gavin Allen
It will happen precisely in 2 weeks
Eli Scott
Another one.
Russia [with Iran] vs Israel in Syria.
Note again that image:
Russia in the Syrian port of Latakia.
Where are those Russian transport ships in the Mediterranean going...?
Thomas Allen
usa
jew
russia
jew
iran
jew
fuck sake
when did Any Forums go kosher
Jack Perez
wtf pootin is doing something based for a change??
Gavin Green
Yes, Hillary was going to start it if she got elected, Trump set it back four years. This board seems to worship Hillary, Podesta, and others associated with the cabal so this post will be ridiculed.
Nathan Torres
Not anymore its not
Lincoln Baker
>Russia [with Iran] vs Israel in Syria.
See image.
Not lying or joking or "fearmongering" here.
Russia is working with Iran in Syria.
"Russia lets Iranian arms planes land at its Syrian air base"
Jan 29, 2022
>In a major concession to Iran – and the third setback in a week for Israel – Moscow is for the first time allowing Iranian weapons-laden flights land at the big Russian Hmeimim air base in western Syria. This follows the announcement of joint Russia-Syria air patrols over the Golan and the deployment of Russian military police units at the Syrian port of Latakia, after it was bombed by Israel as a primary portal for the intake of Iranian weapons shipments for its surrogate forces. Hmeimim is the main hub of Russia’s military operations in Syria. Our sources report that a joint Russia-Syria air defense exercise was conducted this week, another inhibitor of the continuation of Israeli air strikes..
Reference:
debka.com
Oliver Nelson
archive.4plebs.org
Since 1695 (BoE formation) we've lived in 80 years socio-economic cycles, (I've posted about it before); which has always resulted in paradigm change, the last one was 1944-45 and came the Bretton Woods agreement. War or a mass deaths will occur by 2025, either engineered through a bio-weapon, or the vaccines; or perhaps a conventional hot war.
- US money printing and 'overboiling' the world economic system, coming to the end of the present 80year socio-economic cycle* where a new paradigm emerges, the last being Bretton Woods 1944-5, the new system will implement digital IDs and subscription based consumption.
- M.A.D.s doctrine bio-warfare preparatory to potential vector in WW3, rather than destroy infrastructure, if China doesn't acquiesce to IMF/ WB/ ADB on Taiwan (the only major economy outside of the World Bank) instead of AIIB chinese bank.
*80year social-economic cycles (comprising 4 stages^) ushers in new socio-economic paradigms
>1695 to 1775 (80yrs)
Formation of Bank of England to American Revolution
> 1781 to 1861 (80yrs)
creation of US Articles of Confederation (original constitution) to US Civil War
>1865 to 1945 (80yrs)
assassination of Lincoln, end of Greenback and Bretton Woods agreement
>1945 to 2025 (80yrs)
start of Bretton woods and Great Reset (possibly WW3 / American Civil)
^Each cycle of 80years is broken down into 4 stages of approx 20 years.
>EMERGING
growing, prosperity increases e.g. post ww2.
>EXPLORING
social rules are bent and stretched, new market seeking
>EXPANDING
old institutions and social rules fall apart as more privatization and commodification take place
>EFFUSION
the old system is broken the 'elite' seeps civilization into a new system e.g. digital revolution
Anthony Sanders
Just speculating here.
Do not know.
But just think of the implications if those Russian transport ships dock at the port in Latakia, Syria.
Imagine what those Russian ships could be carrying.
The tweet above says 60 military tanks.
That means Russia will have 60 military tanks to fight against Turkey and Israel in Syria, thereby supporting Iran's position over there, *if* Russia is indeed sending that particular fleet to Syria.
Seems reasonable, especially considering they recently sent their own troops to defend the port.
Now think of the following:
- When did Russia start their build-up of forces along the Ukrainian border?
- When did those Russian ships depart from norther Russia?
And perhaps the Russian troops in Ukraine were a diversion to reinforce their military in Syria.
Or, perhaps it's part of a major coordinated operation with Iran...?
If this is the case, that they're indeed working with Iran, that his is a very serious problem.
Christopher Flores
>Seems reasonable, especially considering they recently sent their own troops to defend the port.
See image.
It's well known that when Russia sens naval ships to the Mediterranean, they go to Syria.
So why is the news media saying they're going to Crimea?
It just doesn't make any sense for Russia to make that move: send transport/amphibious ships from their north to the Black Sea, when they can just transport those units on land?
Again, folks will probably know for sure in a few hours or a day or so.