Political implications of trains

discusss

Attached: trainonbridge2.jpg (3872x2592, 1.52M)

they'll never work when your country is full of niggers and your most productive people are spread out in the countryside.

I like trai- *VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM*

pic rel

Attached: ghettotrain.jpg (1024x509, 114.16K)

spbp

Aesthetically more pleasing than roads but I hate not being in control of where I can go.

just get off at your stop, retard

Attached: traintrain.jpg (275x183, 9.32K)

you still need em for cargo. cant image how fucked our highways would be if everything had to be moved by truck to germany.

go back

>political implications of *insert nonpolitical topic*
>1 post by this ID
fuck off

No thanks, I want to go where I want when I want. And I will not be sitting next to niggers.

because you see it would have formerly been owned by Chuck, but the joke is that Sneed owned feed and a seed but Chuck didnt own anything so he never had a store

you didnt even check for the posts by this id you tranny retard train hater

>be me
>slovakian
>kill myself

better learn how to lay rail, user

inb4 schizos appear because im taking precious board space away from their conspiracies for 27 minutes
>SHILLLLL
>SSSSSLLLIIIIDDDE THRED

Discuss what?
They are pretty good when they work, so most of the time around here. I hear they suck ass in the americas because of niggers. Our gypsis have no need to use them so they are nice and clean. Maybe you should give more gibs to your niggers so they stay away from the nice things.

>Make Thread
>Thread isn´t related to politics in the slightest
>Put "What are the Political Implications of..." in the Title
>Thread suddenly becomes Political to the retarded Jannies
>Another SHIT thread hitting Bump-Limit, making Any Forums even shittier.
Jannie-Niggers must Perma-Ban every Thread that has the words "Political Implications" in it.

>perma-ban

Attached: 7CC88F25-F233-436C-869F-EEDA78B738F2.jpg (904x864, 85.33K)

First day eh?

The construction of thousands and thousands of kilometers of railways was one of the fundamental causes of Argentina being the 10th largest economy in the world in the early 1900s. These railways allowed connecting all the productive regions of the country with the port of Buenos Aires and other ports located on the Parana River, which facilitated the export of agricultural and livestock goods. In other words, the agro-export model was heavily dependent on trains. Unfortunately, the Peronist government and the governments that followed it never invested the necessary money to maintain and extend the railways, which in part explains Argentina's economic decline, given that competitiveness was lost since, logically, when the transport capacity of the trains was reduced , they had to start using roads to move goods to ports, something that was much more expensive and took away efficiency and competitiveness from the economy.

I don't know how much political implication this has, but it's the most "political" thing I can think of about trains

>most productive people out in the country
is that how you cope larping like a hick?

Attached: sneed train nl.jpg (1000x750, 605.8K)

Faggot edit.