If capitalism needs more and more consoomers to sustain itself isn’t the end product always going to be mass immigration & overpopulation?
If capitalism needs more and more consoomers to sustain itself isn’t the end product always going to be mass...
Because they are stupid animals
B4BBC
>If capitalism needs more and more consoomers to sustain itself
it doesnt.
>isn’t the end product always going to be mass immigration & overpopulation
No, see Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and many more.
people will always need to buy things because nothing lasts forever. you don't just buy one pair of shoes
POOPA
HELLO FART
this is a lie btw. look how many people work at the richest companies now compared to 80 years ago
based fellow genius poster.
dare I say BRRAAAPPP
>Imagine the smell
If her being burned at the stake for being a witch
POOPA
Give them a few years to catch up to the West.
Japan is still on fax machines, bro. They're in the 80s.
No, the only thing it really needs is a steady growth of manufacturing technology and wages.
The number of consumers doesn't matter, because you can bring down manufacturing costs with better tech to a point it costs fucking nothing.
Instead of this old model what happened was that the manufacturing costs were brought low as dirt with outsourcing, jobs went away and the wages never grew and prices didn't really go down.
Instead of growing the wages people were given debt to supplement their diminishing income.
The entire capitalistic model was subverted completely and became one sided thing where the consumer got fucked and the top makes more money.
Steady growth was switched to a quick leveraged profit and soon we'll all be paying for this borrowed money when the economy shits the bed and all assets get transferred from the bottom to the top.
Nationalist capitalism is fine. For world trade, use protectionism.
jesus christ i need a woman like that in my life.
if shill threads need more and more fapbait to get people into their thread, isn't the end product always going to be a sage?
salsa
>not knowing vera dijkmans at this point
>If capitalism needs more and more consoomers
I read Cooomers.
That's how Wall Street and banks grow, it's not how capitalism works.
To sustain itself? No. But to grow infinitely like they want to? Yes.
Too bad she doesn't do porn.
>If capitalism needs more and more consoomers to sustain itself
Close but wrong. Capitalism needs more and more productivity to sustain itself. That can come from more workers, more efficiency, automation, etc.
>isn’t the end product always going to be mass immigration & overpopulation?
Nah, you can close your borders and rely on your own people instead.
Which will encourage women to pump out babies, so the market of consumers always expands, instead of shrinking.
Right now, its not a big deal that Norway can't reproduce, because why should it be? You can trade with China and sell your products to a billion people. No need to rely on your own domestic growth.
If you couldn't trade with the world. Your economy will shrink until females are forced out of jobs.
That not capitalism you are talking about the fed and this debt spending spiral they built for us.
Capitalism needs minds that will continue the capital accumulation and great Fibonacci curve preventing humanity from material collapse and species wide extinction spiraling. The spiral only moves in two direction. The drill must pierce through to find the material it needs to keep going or it dies.
I've been on nofap for a month now, but i would gladly burn a nut for her if she did porn