The more I learn about statistics as a mathematical field the less I believe them. It's so easy to lie with statistics and people will just believe it at face value.
I saw someone say 94.6% of all covid deaths were unvaccinated. Does that number include the people who died before the vaccine even came out? Who is your source on that number? Did you just make it up? I have no idea and the fact that retards will just see a statistic online and believe it without question is mind blowing
Other urls found in this thread:
Surely you've read pic related?
1300 is a good number for polling purposes
>I saw someone say 94.6% of all covid deaths were unvaccinated. Does that number include the people who died before the vaccine even came out? Who is your source on that number? Did you just make it up? I have no idea and the fact that retards will just see a statistic online and believe it without question is mind blowing
how are we supposed to answer this question, YOU are the one who said YOU saw it.
Where did you see it and why didn't you ask them?
you're an idiot.
I remember taking quantitative methods in college, and the formulas used to calculate data/statistics are just loosely based. Nothing is ever definite. Statistics can be interpreted in so many ways. Whatever you want it to be. This is why "experts" and leftoids love it so much.
>memeflag
opinion discarded.
No but it looks like a good read. I did see this good video though youtu.be
I'm almost certain it's a fake statistic but that's not really my point. I'm just dumbfounded that people will see a number online and just believe it without question like the npc's they are
look at the numbers you swine
same
don't give memeflags a (you), don't even read what they have to say
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
>t.math degree AMA
and what kind of fucking primitive draws out a bar graph on lined paper
get out of here americunt, simpleton piece of shit
The definition of "vaccinated" is ever changing. So are all the other rules within the Covid era. When they say unvaccinated, they're including people who have been vaccinated but people who have only received one jab, or both jabs and no boosters. It's retarded, and purposely done this way so that the CDC and the feds can work the pandemic in whatever favor they want.
Plus being that the general public is absolutely retarded, weak, and fearful, they believe whatever is put out, even if the information is the total opposite of each other just a day apart.
you stinking mixed race ape
If believing something you agree with without checking it makes you an NPC; what does it make a person who disbelieves something they disagree with without checking it?
>euromutt intelligence
>Does that number include the people who died before the vaccine even came out?
sounds like it, if it's even a genuine figure (whatever that means). All the stats during the Age Of Covid are suspect because we usually don't know what's going on behind those numbers. Who gets tested? vaxxed, unvaxxed? What's the cycle threshold on the tests, and does it change depending on whos being tested? Here in NB, Canada, you aren't considered vaxxed if 6 months or more have passed since your last shot. Think how that fucks the stats up literally day by day. Nah, the whole thing is a fucking con job, and they'll make it say whatever they want for whatever reason. Best you can do is maybe find something they missed and even then, nobody cares. Just get your shots, do as you're told, and keep your unacceptable views to your hateful racist self bitch.
A skeptic. It's good to be skeptical. Makes it harder to be lied to. I'm not saying I don't believe stats, I just need to be proven they are good stats before I will believe them
In the US, as a doctor, you designate your patient with a “CPT Code”. These are codes that are revised annually, and there is a code for every medical procedure that you can imagine. Once the doctor has assigned a diagnosis, these “CPT Codes” are considered an “Accession”, and the insurance and billing departments of the source of treatment will parley with each other, argue and negotiate over what will be reimbursed according to contractual agreements that are drafted annually.
HOWEVER, with the introduction of COVID, the government introduced a “CPT Code” that is COVID-specific. So if a guy comes into the ER after suffering from a heart attack, and coincidentally tests positive for COVID, the doctors will assign the COVID “CPT Code”, in which case the US Federal government will reimburse the full cost of treatment.
So, if a patient is coming in for an emergency, and he tests positive for COVID, this is a fucking gold mine. They can assign the COVID CPT Code, and they collect 100% of the cost of treatment from Uncle Sam, no questions asked.
So what would you do as a doctor, who is assigned certain KPI metrics to bring the hospital revenue up? Rather than be honest and assign a CPT code for a heart attack and any auxiliary treatment, which would lead to a very costly parley and negotiation with an insurance company over what will be covered, or would you just skip the bullshit and assign the COVID CPT Code and collect 100%, no questions asked?
t. guy who works for a company who handles the billing, coding, and patient follow-up with insurance companies on the behalf of doctors. We actually had a meeting where they accused the doctors of juking the stats. If they assign the COVID CPT Code, we get nothing, since our revenue is dependent on a % of billing collections from the patient. If they use the COVID CPT Code, we get nothing, since the patient pays nothing.
US healthcare system is so fucked up beyond all repair.
Whew, that was close. For a second I thought you were an NPC luckily you rationalized it in a way where you're not, just the people that disagree with you.