If Japan didn't attack Pearl Harbor could Germany have won the war...

If Japan didn't attack Pearl Harbor could Germany have won the war? USA never would have entered the war without being attacked first because it was wildly unpopular, but they would have kept supplying the allies and blockading japanese oil supplies. It would have been a war of attrition. Could the axis have held out until the British people finally said enough of this shit and refused to fight for Jewrchill?

Attached: 1643626134536.gif (480x270, 3.8M)

...

>until the British people finally said enough of this shit and refused to fight for Jewrchill?
would never happen

The Axis lost. grow up and deal with it.

Maybe Roosevelt would have entered the war anyway. Churchill had some American ties.

Attached: winston fiver.jpg (769x576, 136.59K)

Very common misconception. Japan and Germany knew the us was readying to join the allies.
The us had been disrupting Japanese oil lines in the south Pacific for a couple years at that point. They had all but actually fired on the Japanese directly.

Hitler was furious about Japan's timing, but Japan didn't have much choice and took the bait at Pearl harbor.

It not entirely certain of Hitler would have won without the us. His capabilities as a military leader were laughable, and he alone is responsible for losing the war in Russia. Not because "muh don't invade Russia in winter" meme, but because instead of following his generals advice and attacking in full strength the Russian oil fields, his own ego got in the way and he ordered his panzer corp to attack the oil fields, while the wehrmacht footmen without hardly any armor would split off and attack Stalingrad, just to wipe the name Stalin off the map. Without armor break a siege, all the Russians had to was throw wave after wave of peasants in until the Germans ran out of supplies. Even though the Russian oil fields were burning thanks to the panzer corps, without substantial boots to hold them, the Russians quickly repelled the Germans and rebuilt the fields.

This action alone, splitting his ground troops and panzers, is regarded as the worst military mistake of ww2

USA was sending supplies to England, the declaration of war was a mere formality

The americans were counting the days before fabricate another Lusitania or Maine

Germany couldn't win that war. No matter what they did, thy were doomed to lose from the start.

No, you don’t have a full picture of history. USA spent all of late 40 and early 41 trying to bait an attack from Japan because the Jew whispering in fdr’s ear wanted war with japan to start war with Germany.

What you REALLY were never taught (outside of the illegal abcd blockade) was that america was in the process of a first strike on Japanese cities and it had been greenling well before Pearl Harbor. It just took too long to move the strike supplies to China. If Pearl Harbor doesn’t happen USA would strike first. And likely have a false flag to create more support.

No, Germany actually was utterly destroying every other superpower. England was crippled. France had fallen. All of Eastern Europe had either submitted or burned. Africa was in ruin. Russia itself too was doomed, of not for Hitler's egotistic retardation.

Seems a bit dubious. How do you quickly repair burning oil fields? Who expects your opponent to use civilian peasants as war fodder to stop tank advancement?

Niponanon, Pearl harbor *was* a false flag.
Just a coincidence the us didn't realize a huge fleet had amassed so close? Just a coincidence the aircraft carrier present at Pearl harbor was ordered to leave immediately before the attack, or the other carriers enroute we're ordered to take a detour?
Nah, Pearl harbor was the false flag we wanted. Lose a handful of outdated ships, keep our carriers well out of harms way, and rile up the conservatives

Germany was doomed. Even if they had taken Moscow, Russia wouldn't surrender and would just keep fighting and bleeding Germany out. Eventually they would have run out of resources and failed. Their entire gamble was betting on Russia's surrender after the initial disaster, yet it failed to manifest itself. Germany couldn't fight a war of attrition for long on multiple fronts.

I don’t know what the fuck this gif is but I’m saving it

Isn't supplying one side already an act of war?

FDR was already violating neutrality laws and if the USSR and UK had continued floundering he probably would have ginned up an incident. For example on 10/31/41 the Germans sunk an American destroyer named the Reuben James. Suppose it were autumn of 42 and the US still isn't in the war and the British and Soviets are losing. A similar incident would have been played up to justify entering the war.

Soviets retook Stalingrad by just sieging with endless artillery and unending waves of peasant conscripts. Without armor to break it of the city and attack the artillery, Stalingrad was a grave for the Germans.

The oil fields was another battle of attrition. Without sufficient ground forces to hold positions the panzer corp could do nothing but burn and turn

Also, don't underestimate the Soviet ability to sacrifice peasants to rush construction. The only people that come close to them are China.

The only politics in this thread is the Jewish politics of white on white conflict.
This shit belongs in /his/ but the Jewish mods would rather it stays here.

Good post friend.

>USA never would have entered the war without being attacked first
They would've made it happen one way or another, the jew dictates it.

Attached: japan ww2.png (1605x791, 194.21K)

Sneed

Almost all major accessible resources and factories were within striking distance or already controlled by the German front in Russia. If Hitler had not broken apart his forces outr of spite for Stalin, then Russian legit was doomed. The Soviet army was already severely limited on supplies, if Germany managed to hold western Russia for only another year or so then it doesn't matter how many angry slavs attack if all they have is sticks and tuberculosis.