Christianity: improvement???

>The pagan savages burned human beings alive as tribute to the veneration of their gods. How evil! Those gods were demons. What brute behavior, to offer human life in exchange for some supernatural benefits.
>Which heretic do we have to burn at the stake today, Dominic. I know it seems bad, but we need to protect Christ’s sacred doctrine from demonic corruption. By showing our fidelity to the Lord, we offer him veneration and he will reward us with grace.

Was Christianity really that much of an improvement?

As above, so below

Attached: 51B097EB-001F-49CD-9F5E-FFB77F872306.jpg (1500x1500, 166.16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/paEcbd2PbiQ
ancient-origins.net/history-ancient-traditions/fearsome-wicker-man-eerie-way-druids-committed-human-sacrifice-005285
amp.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginians-sacrificed-own-children-study
outlawbiblestudent.org/circumcision-in-the-bible-what-was-it-really-all-about-why-on-the-8th-day/
archive.is/F4vHj
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>>The pagan savages burned human beings alive as tribute to the veneration of their gods. How evil!
Literally Christian lies, while they cut up their kid's foreskins for supernatural benefit.

The First Epistle Of Paul To The Corinthians 1:19
youtu.be/paEcbd2PbiQ

No where does Jesus condone violence against anyone. He says to love your enemies. Your shitty strawman btfo. Saged

Jeremiah 32:35
ancient-origins.net/history-ancient-traditions/fearsome-wicker-man-eerie-way-druids-committed-human-sacrifice-005285

amp.theguardian.com/science/2014/jan/21/carthaginians-sacrificed-own-children-study

Ever read the Old Testament?

What about the eternal burning of infidels?

What about the old testament? Show me a passage where Jesus condones violence, oh wait you can't. Btfo

christians are nasty and evil, why do you think its popular on Any Forums? If christianity was good it would be hated here. In fact the people who hate christianity on that board hate it because it's not evil enough

Tip of the foreskin to allow for peeing with risk of infection:
outlawbiblestudent.org/circumcision-in-the-bible-what-was-it-really-all-about-why-on-the-8th-day/

Not removal of foreskin like after 140AD.

Without risk of infection*

Jesus burnt Sodom and Gomorrah:
>5Although you are fully aware of this, I want to remind you that after Jesus had delivered His people out of the land of Egypt, He destroyed those who did not believe. 6And the angels who did not stay within their own domain but abandoned their proper dwelling—these He has kept in eternal chains under darkness, bound for judgment on that great day. 7In like manner, Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, who indulged in sexual immorality and pursued strange flesh, are on display as an example of those who sustain the punishment of eternal fire.

Jude 1:5

The one who led Israel out of Egypt and he who destroyer of Sodom and Gommorah

>Jesus burnt Sodom and Gomorrah
And? Jesus is God and as such has all rights to do with His creation as He sees fit. He is perfect and infinite and his judgement cannot therefore be flawed. If you don't like His judgement, then YOU are wrong. Oh and that's not Him condoning violence, enjoy your failure

He condones violence by his very actions.

When he orders Israelites to wage war and kill. Jesus condones violence in particular circumstances.

Sodom and Gommorah was real by the way:
archive.is/F4vHj

>Jesus is God and as such has all rights to do with His creation as He sees fit.
literal evil worship

You're just flat out retarded. He gives commands to love your enemy, Jesus committed no violence, and died instead of vaporizing those who crucified Him. Your red herring about the Israelites is also flawed. The Israelites were commanded to posses the land which was promised by God, and they were used as instruments of Gods judgement. Again, God has all rights to use whoever He wants however he wants. Furthermore, the Israelites were commanded not to keep any wealth for themselves precisely because it was an act of judgement and not an act of acquisition via warfare. Btfo

By what moral authority are you defining good and evil? Without God you have no objective morality you self refuting dunce

Jesus literally committed violence before he was even a baby in Mary's womb. And will commit violence in the 2nd coming. Don't you know.

Yes Jesus commanded to love our personal enemies to get them to repent. And also to have good interpersonal relationships.

But that doesn't mean self-defense or judgment from the State as God's instrument is illegitimate(Romans 13)

But God cannot act unjustly. Therefore his character limits what he does.

most if not all the people burned alive were drug dealers

they made mushroom tea, people "saw the devil", they run into the woods and get eaten by wolves

Inquisition was just a medieval version of the narcotics division

And? Our current moral system built on our experience, intellect and history, and environment is superior to yours. A 21th century 8yo is more moral that yout book. Your morality is objectively trash

>t.windsock smegma cock

Jesus is God and can do whatever he wants, his actions are not condoning violence because he gives exit commands against it. Youre incapable of separating God and the commands given to Christians

Lol your current system of faggots, trannies and satanic Jewish control which is destroying the world isn't superior to anything

Right. And yet somehow Jesus commanded disciples to carry a sword for self-defense. And also Authorized the Government in Romans 13 to kill criminals.

Don't talk to us about morality leaf. Your politicians made doggy blowjobs legal. Beastiality is immoral for several reasons.

its much better than before yes lol. not even close. all you have is muh gays!!
>which is destroying the world
your death cult is the #1 threat to the world since its fighting against climate change. Your worship death and evil and thats why you like it

refusing to fight climate change*

No he does not. You're illiterate, stupid, or lying, take your pick. When Peter used violence to defend Jesus, he was rebuked by Jesus himself. Not one disciple defended himself, all but John were martyred. Governments are not the church. I. The old testament God used Cyrus as a tool of judgement, Cyrus did not follow God but was used because all things bow to the will of God and work for His glory. Take a seat, neophyte

You worship death. Men pretending to be women, faggotry. They don't produce life. You faggots hate life and love death. Actually you do like life, the worm parasites you get from your degenerate behaviors.
Jesus is the way the truth and the LIFE

Now that... Sounds way less painful; thanks for the information, but I'm still keeping my foreskin, for its sacrifice is no longer needed.

>As above, so below
Typical freemason faggot shill.

>No he does not. You're illiterate, stupid, or lying, take your pick. When Peter used violence to defend Jesus, he was rebuked by Jesus himself.

Because Jesus was meant to die on the cross. Nothing to do with self-defense on the roads where the bandits were.

>Governments are not the church.

But Christians in Government are instruments of God's Judgment.

You think the Government are to be staffed with only non-Christians.

>Not one disciple defended himself, all but John were martyred.

Sure. Its unwise to rebel against Rome. Likewise they aren't in the Government themselves so they aren't authorized to use violence except in self-defense against Criminals.

Great, then just show me one passage where Jesus condones violence. Oh wait, you can't!

You believe that Jesus' didn't rise from the dead ascend to heaven to his Father's Right Hand. And communicate with the Apostles to get them to write the letters in the New Testament.

The Old Testament was a necessary stepping stone. Lets be thankful for the incarnation that renders that unnecessary.

Bro I'm waiting on the passage that supports your claims. It seems you can't provide any

>Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.