Hypergamy is based

If the free market is a good thing, then the free sexual market must also be as good.

Simple as.

Attached: ymoiq7d3i5j11.jpg (828x979, 408.51K)

I'm fucked up and this pain dies with me.

Sex doesn’t cure the dread

this is more than just about sex, leaflet

> giving fathomless power to jews is a good idea
> giving fathomless power to women is a good idea

neither of these things are good

Liberalization of sex is just a response to boomers pushing for same-age couples
Aim younger

slide thread

Hypergamy is the natural breeding order and it repairs the genome from monogamous damage

Women are designated property of his father then his husband, if the product isn't listed for sale in the market then it isn't free market.

I mean it's not optimal.
The bottom females have access to the top 3.3% of men. So they will produce low quality offspring.
There should be a cut off for them. Then it would be optimal.

Nature’s answer for this is lower quality women being unable to give birth to the alpha skull or dying in childbirth. If she manages to birth her offspring won’t reproduce anyway.

You leafs were being based there for a while, don't ruin it so quickly.

Neither free markets nor free sex is good.

Both Ricardo and the hippies were wrong. Today's world is the result.

It's not a free market for sex unless you can buy, sell and own women.

Relevant image. A lot of woman suffer from the same problem as many men; they set their expectations way too high and do shit all of anything to take care of themselves. All 10 women there would happily partner with the top three men, but only the top three to five women have a realistic shot at them.

Attached: bag-of-shit.jpg (500x473, 71.14K)

>If the free market is a good thing
then why do you outlaw direct cash transactions for a product most thots are willing to sell?
sounds alot like the cia drug scam

The human penis is shaped like a plunger for a reason. Hint: it ain't because we're monogamous. It's designed to scoop and suck out other men's cum so you can get your swimmers in there in greater numbers.

Monogamy creates slavery and a permanent genetic underclass. All of the social derangement we’re seeing now is a result of genetic stratification ie. pulling the genes apart to their absolute limits. If all births survive and malignant genes are allowed to propagate society breaks off into permanent caste systems or dies. Inequality at its root is entirely genetic.

Then we don't even need hypergamy.

They will reproduce if they are female.

Graph is bullshit, everyone goes for the top 3.

Youre starting with good principles, but youre forgetting that women cant be just granted child support and divorce gibs when she gets mad. Also, no welfare. When the market is free, you will see how women truly behave.

>All of the social derangement we’re seeing now is a result of genetic stratification
user please. Are you seriously implying that all of modern societies problems are from marriage issues? What we're seeing these days is a very deliberate move to divide the underclasses against each other and transform society into a form of neofedualism, while removing any characteristics that could lead to resistance (family unit, national identity, etc). Besides, these problems weren't present to such a degree even two generations ago, and genetic changes on a mass level don't express that quickly.

Neither the free market nor the free sexual market is a good thing, as looking at the world as it is should immediately tell you.

Birth control has something to say to you