What are the political implications of the white Germanic race being direct descendants of the 10 tribes of Israel...

The bible story is actual real history. This gets clear when you look at the story of Joseph alone. Joseph, in the bible, was sold off as slave to egypt, where he became friends with the pharao and married his daughter. He was given authority over everything. Compare that with the Yuya-mummie which was blond by the way.
web.archive.org/web/20170319164635/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuya
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_(Genesis)

Hitlers "Herrenrasse" probably was meant to mean "Rasse des Herrn" "Race of the Lord"
The 1000 year Reich was meant to be the 1000 year Sabbath, the 7th day which never happened because Satan interrupted it and which is for God like a thousand years.
This is why the Nazis had a sense of superiority like the Israelis had for the goyim.
The (((Jew))), like everything, stole their identity from others. Just like they took german names, have plastic surgery to look more white, act white when it suits them they stole their whole identity of being a jew from the whites

From the Bible
>20 King Arius of the Spartans.
>To the high priest Onias. Greetings!
>21 It has been discovered in a written record that the Spartans and the Jews are relatives and are both of the family of Abraham. 22 Since we have learned this, please let us know how you are. 23 On our part, we write to let you know that what is yours—your livestock and property—belongs to us, and ours belongs to you. We therefore command that our envoys report to you in keeping with this.

Attached: yuya.jpg (700x590, 94.95K)

Note that hebrew like we know it exist like this like the middle of the 19th century.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language
>Archaic Biblical Hebrew from the 10th to the 6th century BCE, corresponding to the Monarchic Period until the Babylonian Exile and represented by certain texts in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), notably the Song of Moses (Exodus 15) and the Song of Deborah (Judges 5). Also called Old Hebrew or Paleo-Hebrew. It was written in the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. A script descended from this, the Samaritan alphabet, is still used by the Samaritans.
Originally the bible was written in Paleo-Hebrew.

Pic related, left is Paleo Hebrew and on the right the Vinca Runes found across europe, mainly central and southeast giving a further connection between those
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-Hebrew_alphabet
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinča_symbols
given a further connection that the real isralites and chosen people are the aryans

piramidasunca.ba/bs/latest-news/item/3495-the-oldest-writing-in-the-world-has-been-decoded.html
>(1) O Three-One God of the land of Thrace,
>(2) I vow in Truth to bring you all due offerings, O great Son of God,
>(3) And only you (shall) I praise (and exalt), O my God (for you are) great!
>(4) You who are now in your temple, (I pray, hear me), keep me safe and deliver me (from all evil)!
Three one god, the trinity being a theme in the oldest text we have deciphered so far. The trinity is another theme which draws itself across a lot of culture, from sumer to egypt, to the Nordics and of course christianity written in the Vinca Runes, found in Bulgaria (Balkans)

behindthename.com/name/adam
>This is the Hebrew word for "man". It could be ultimately derived from Hebrew אדם ('adam) meaning "to be red", referring to the ruddy colour of human skin
red, like whites are right after birth or when too long in the sun, or when blushing

Attached: paleo hebrew.jpg (203x318, 8.73K)

A picture commanded to be made of Jesus by Tiberius Ceasar. Appearently a recreation, but still in the Library of Congress so probably accurate
loc.gov/pictures/item/90707066/

Esau, the twin brother of Jacob, who birthed the Israelites is described as
>25The first one came out red, covered with hair like a fur coat; so they named him Esau
red hair, a trait usually found in whites mostly. If Esau was white his twinbrother was too.

>7Her dignitaries were brighter than snow, whiter than milk; their bodies were more ruddy than rubies, their appearance like sapphires. 8But now their appearance is blacker than soot; they are not recognized in the streets. Their skin has shriveled on their bones; it has become as dry as a stick
So first they were white, then something happened, likely the captivity where they were brought away, and were replaced by dark people.

journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003316
>We reconstructed the genetic structure of the Levantines and found that a pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners

penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-12.html
>And when he had given them [Jews/Descendents of the high priesthood] leave, they also hid the circumcision of their genitals; that even when they were naked they might appear to be Greeks. Accordingly they left off all the customs that belonged to their own countrey, and imitated the practices of the other nations.
so the ancient Judahites/Levites (when its about the descendents of the priesthood probably) looked just like the greeks

Attached: Our savior by Tiberius Ceasar.jpg (523x640, 21.78K)

Ancient Migration in relation to the Bibles narrative

To start
I believe Abraham derives from the Indo Europeans Further I use the Greek Septuagint timeline

Proto indo europeans appeared around the in the late 4th millenium BC (4k-3k BC) at the caucasus. greek septuagint puts the flood at 3,3k BC with the mount aratat where the ark landed too being in that area traditionally.
from 3k-2k BC the first big migrations happened. tower of babel accordong to greek septuagint was around 2,8k BC

The global ties were broken down and thepeople scattered. then phoenicians a few centuries later appear and their writings are found across all of Europe and some indicate in the entire world. there we not only find the writings but also many of the same basic myths. Now is the question wether the myths were taken from the phoenicians or were inherited from before they spread making the different cultures take up the writings because they saw initially records of their own myths in them

So to make sense of the migration patterns it would be nice to know just where the tower of babel was located
answersresearchjournal.org/where-is-the-tower-of-babel/
>In another example, the Babylonian account of a campaign by the Hittite king, Mursili I, said that he went against “Shinar” (Sa-an-ha-ra). However, a Neo-Hittite document about the same campaign said it was against the country of “Babylon” (Kalimi 2000, p. 1213). We see in this example that Shinar was named as a territory in its own right in the one account, but was considered as part of the Babylonian empire in the other account. Because the Hittite kingdom was located in the north, largely contained in what is western Turkey today (Hittite Period, 2006), the area of Shinar would have been right next door and would have been quite convenient for making a campaign.

Attached: real israel.png (1200x631, 282.92K)

Afaik there are arab myths around saying Abraham came from a family that left Babel because of its wickedness which is why he was chosen.
Ur Kasdim from where Abraham left from towards the promosed land is assumed to be sanliurfa in southern turkey (around where also göbekli tepe is)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ur_of_the_Chaldees
At least thats one of the candidates for it
So basically it would mean Babel was somewhere around north westerm Turkey, Abrahams family left from there and moved south eastwards. Babel happens and the nations spread. Shem/whites to the west into Europe, Ham towards the south into arabia and afrika, somehow australia too (as I assume abbos to be the same group), and japeth took up the east and overseas (americas).
Around 2k BC Abraham is then around Sanliurfa, makes the covenant and moves into the levant

I would assme germans are Judah, as quite a lot of rulers came from germany, kings but even modern US presidents, linking to the promise given to David who was of Judah

No matter how many arrows you drawn in the map it won't change the fact that Scythians are a PIE ethnic-linguistic group which is completely unrelated with the Semitic ethnic-linguistic group which you worship. The dates also makes zero sense considering the history of Europe occupation.

They're not and it's all rewarmed British Israelism. You wanna be a fucking kike go ahead. There is no linguistic or cultural continuity between the Indo-European peoples and the Hebrews of the Old Testament.

Khazars were a Turkic tribe. Askhenazi jews has nothing Turkic about them, not in language, genetics or culture. They don't cluster with Tatars or Turkish people in DNA tests too, they cluster with Southern Italians. Also we don't know if modern Slavs comes from Scythians or not. Scythians were Indo-Iranic speakers. And their haplogroup was R1a-Z93, but it doesn't exist in Europe besides very small numbers. Their haplogroups are more related to Central Asian Turkic/Iranic groups.

Attached: 1640125221714.png (1442x1132, 778.07K)

please get the fuck off this website you british israelism spreading coping protestant.

If you’re getting flak you’re over the target

No, it means you're a fucktard falling for shit that was literally propagated in the 19th century by kikes to go "my fellow goyium, we are just like you! You are a tribe related to us!"

I think England is Judah as they inherited the throne of David, but it’s just an interesting image because there’s really no way to tell the 10 tribes apart

Modern Jews are not the descendents of Judah of the Bible.
Their story begins with Esau, the twin brother of Jacob, the father of the 12 tribes of Israel. He had a quarrel with Jacob, Jacob fled and in the meantime Esau took canaanites as wifes
>1This is the account of Esau (that is, Edom). 2Esau took his wives from the daughters of Canaan: Adah daughter of Elon the Hittite, Oholibamah daughter of Anah and granddaughter of Zibeon the Hivite, 3and Basemath daughter of Ishmael and sister of Nebaioth
These and their descendents are the known as the Edomites. Among the Edomites there are the Amelek
>12Additionally, Timna, a concubine of Esau’s son Eliphaz, gave birth to Amalek. These are the grandsons of Esau’s wife Adah.
which later became the enemy of Israel and are seen as their eternal nemesis.

This is who they are, but how did they become known as the Jews, the descendents of Judah and Israel?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom
>The Edomites first established a kingdom ("Edom") in the southern area of modern-day Jordan and later migrated into the southern parts of the Kingdom of Judah ("Idumea", or modern-day southern Israel/Negev) when Judah was first weakened and then destroyed by the Babylonians, in the 6th century BC.
The original ones were conquered by Babylon and carried away. The Edomites settled there and took things over, and after the original Judahites returned they fought and eventually
>They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 BC), who forcibly converted them, among others, to Judaism
Notethat "Judaism" isnt here the modern Judaism.
Somewhere in the meantime the Pharisee were founded whichs tradition is based on the oral law which became the talmud and very likely was influenced by babylonian teachings the Judahites brought back and is the foundation of modern Judaism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
>The Pharisees preserved the Pharisaical oral law in the form of the Talmud

Attached: canaanite jew.jpg (464x211, 33.44K)

>You are a tribe related to us!
Nope, see

Modern Jews are not the descendents of Judah of the Bible.
Their story begins with Esau, the twin brother of Jacob, the father of the 12 tribes of Israel. He had a quarrel with Jacob, Jacob fled and in the meantime Esau took canaanites as wifes
>1This is the account of Esau (that is, Edom). 2Esau took his wives from the daughters of Canaan: Adah daughter of Elon the Hittite, Oholibamah daughter of Anah and granddaughter of Zibeon the Hivite, 3and Basemath daughter of Ishmael and sister of Nebaioth
These and their descendents are the known as the Edomites. Among the Edomites there are the Amelek
>12Additionally, Timna, a concubine of Esau’s son Eliphaz, gave birth to Amalek. These are the grandsons of Esau’s wife Adah.
which later became the enemy of Israel and are seen as their eternal nemesis.

This is who they are, but how did they become known as the Jews, the descendents of Judah and Israel?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom
>The Edomites first established a kingdom ("Edom") in the southern area of modern-day Jordan and later migrated into the southern parts of the Kingdom of Judah ("Idumea", or modern-day southern Israel/Negev) when Judah was first weakened and then destroyed by the Babylonians, in the 6th century BC.
The original ones were conquered by Babylon and carried away. The Edomites settled there and took things over, and after the original Judahites returned they fought and eventually
>They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 BC), who forcibly converted them, among others, to Judaism
Notethat "Judaism" isnt here the modern Judaism.
Somewhere in the meantime the Pharisee were founded whichs tradition is based on the oral law which became the talmud and very likely was influenced by babylonian teachings the Judahites brought back and is the foundation of modern Judaism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
>The Pharisees preserved the Pharisaical oral law in the form of the Talmud

Attached: White Israelites.jpg (1898x1498, 1.28M)

Attached: 1641944678886.jpg (1024x554, 138.43K)

Jacob literally Jewed Esau out of his heritage.

dont bongs come from germans, saxons being specifically? so it would mean we both are correct

Esau voided his inheritance when he took black wives

That is literally why Jews in the 19th Century wrote books about it. They said as much in letters to each other.
You've been played by kikes. Accept Jesus Christ as Lord, but you are not the same kind of Jew He was.

>let me tell you who is white

Attached: 1635034125433.png (449x443, 20.14K)

There were multiple people whose tribes and progeny were descendants of Abraham and Jacob.

Several groups of these ancient israelites were pushed out/chose to leave. Several hundred years later, the Torah was formally codified.

One can be a descendant of Jacob and Abraham. They could be descendants of the supporters of King David and still not be religiously Jewish. As formal organized judaism didn't exist again until several hundreds of years after these groups began their migration into the steppes and caucuses and eventually into continental Europe.

They're killing us because they think it pleases their God. But think about the massive transgression against God to target a fellow chosen bloodline and try to genocide them for being a lighter skin color or some perceived fear. Vice versa goes for the Judean tribe (1 of many, yet the sole modern focus) who wasn't expelled. No one is denying their partial claim to the lands and the customs, but it needs to be shared with other previously lost tribes as intended.

Yeah they’re all from the same original stock, although that’s a point of contention between British Israelism and Christian Identity as bongs as themselves as the sole inheritors of God’s promises to Israel

he also sold it to jacob with full understandibg of what he is doing

>Hey guys, the descendants of this guy are evil, bad and evil on a genetic level. We are the descendants from his twin brother so we are totally good.
The state of christcuck IQ

>They said as much in letters to each other.
Ok let’s see those letters

Attached: 1638236439953.png (1134x3939, 1.26M)

easy, Europeans are such pathetic, decadent and inoperable race some of them have started LARPing as their spiritual masters and conquerors in an unprecedented display of Stockholm syndrome
literally a race of slaves built to serve their Jewish masters

No. It should really be groups of people who can genetically and archaeogenetically be traced back to certain migration patterns alluded to in scripture. The historical context would support it further.

There's evidence that shows that the lost tribes may have retained some elements of pre-Torah, and thus pre-Judaism culture, but it wasn't even a formal religion until several hundred years after these migrations. Helon

Attached: 1638145730968.png (1080x810, 1.11M)

>revealingthetruth.weebly.com/anglo-saxon-celts-were-israelites.html
How does this guy have Christian Identity videos along side, "Are you saved videos ?"
He must not understand Christian Identity.
We don't believe in Salvation. We believe is Preservation of the Race of Adam.

The word 'saved' is another misunderstood word. Along with salvation and deliverance.
The common definition in all three is PRESERVATION.

Preservation in this life. During this mortal life. This life is our test, our trial. “That I may prove them, whether they will walk in My law, or no.”
The “churches” teach “once saved, always saved”.
They also teach, that by your own declaration, you get to choose to be “saved” (as if it were up to YOU).
They also teach the gospel of “personal salvation”.
None of these are scriptural and are only “church” doctrine.

Scripture teaches that we are 'preserved' through Christ IF we follow The Way, His laws and commands, have true knowledge and understanding, and live righteously according to our heritage.
Scripture teaches that HE CHOOSES. Not YOU!

Luke 10:22 All things are delivered to Me of My Father: and no man knoweth who the Son is, but the Father; and who the Father is, but the Son, and he to whom the Son wishes to reveal Him.
John 6:44 No man can come to Me, except the Father which hath sent Me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

And rather than 'personal salvation', the Scripture teaches the gospel of the kingdom.
ageoflaodicea.com/saved-3-2/