What are the political implications of Nanotechnology? Is it even avoidable?

Demonstration from a year ago alluding to the use of injectable nano-technology in the future
youtube.com/watch?v=2TjdGuBK9mI

Ultra-Potent Covid-19 Vaccine made with Nanotechnology considered super-effective because the body treats it as a virus
youtube.com/watch?v=a7okOVz0Dms

7 Years ago, walking nano-bots demonstration
youtube.com/watch?v=YdjERhTczAs

Potential damage from such nanotechnological applications brought up 12 years ago
youtube.com/watch?v=9zspCb5mETc

It seems people will talk about a lot of things, I'm heavily concerned most people aren't referring to these subjects. For example, while they call those referring to 5g (fifth-generation RF tech) as potentially dangerous insane, they also removed information online about NON-ionizing burns and damages caused by RF burns.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513191/

Attached: Nano-Smart-Dust.jpg (800x530, 60.63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hmNzf9ztnAk
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yea dude it's over. We had out chance to basically embrace some kind of communism and build a genuine utopian society that worked for the people. Right-wingers opposed it and wanted to protect the system that treats us like cattle, so now with the technology coming we will all genuinely be taken to the next level of cattledom.

Op is based.
They’re putting it in everything now from McDonald’s to jabs to tap water there’s literally no escaping it.
You never were supposed to anyway.
Clean resources are for the elites, we are just the lower classes, but soon the tide will turn....it has to...

Sounds like Any Forums to me

Thanks fren, realistically speaking, do you think there is a way they are planning to avoid the consequences for themselves?
I mean, they could be brainwashed, or insane, but we cannot assume idiotic. This took years of careful planning. Do you think they have a plan in-case this backfires? EMP-ing themselves possibly?

What if they receive a blood transfusion?
I'm interested in others thoughts on the subject, how small a subset of the elite do you think are in on the potential repercussions?

Why? It isn't random, it is political as it is sort a forced medication. Unless you don't consider forced medical treatments without valid consent poltical.

Sure, but communism isn't really a political system, it's a monetary system such as capitalism. While this is irrelevant to my point, I don't think anyone would be letting Mao or Stalin inject them with a random concoction, well, if they had a choice under such communist regimes.

Communism means you believe in a stateless and classless society

Anyone bitching about Mao or Stalin is just proving how uneducated they are, too. Because those societies grew out of feudalism. That's why they were "not real communism". They were taking steps out of feudalism and fighting against violent feudalists (generally, these are the people who got killed under communism that we're now brainwashed to think are "victims").

Communism has nothing to do with the sort of government Lenin Mao or Stalin instituted. It's "Not real communism" because they were dealing with the remnants of a property-less political system that already existed and still had many supporters in their country.

Imagine being poor and unironically being stupid enough to support feudalism. This is how retarded right-wingers are and there were a lot of those people in those places.

I really respect your opinion, but I'd like to keep at the topic at hand, with all due respect to your opinion user. I don't want to de-rail the thread into nonsensical banter.

No you said something retarded and I explained to you why what you said is retarded and I'll keep doing it if I need to

You may post as you wish, but I won't respond to anything other than the subject I brought up. I don't think you are a shill, yet. Maybe you're passionate about a political ideology. Regardless, I'd like to discuss the ramifications of Nanotechnology in any given political, ideological or monetary system.

Again, thank you for the response.

Mostly true but right wingers rarely say something true about the economy. They don't focus on the critical issues.

LMAO you're such a moron. Anyway, don't you realize you're going to need to abolish institutions of hierarchy and oppression in order to avoid being treated like literal fucking cattle? Isn't the connection here pretty fucking obvious? Isn't it clear why you need communism and why your society is gonna die out because it rejected communism?

Apologies, I have many opinions on the matter, but they have nothing to do with this subject. If you'd like to debate communism, to which you are ascribing motive to my opinions I'll have to assume you merely do not want others to discuss this topic.

Again, I respect you and your opinion, if you post information on such matters I will gladly read them to further educate myself on those other topics at a later time. I would like to ask your opinion specifically on this subject though (nano-technology) and its probable impact on global politics for all sides of the political spectrum.

LMAO. I just gave you my thoughts on it's impact on global politics, you retard. Specifically, I told you that you needed to embrace communism, AKA a stateless and classless society in which all systems of hierarchy and oppression are abolished, in order to avoid being nano-tagged and herded to your inevitable doom like nano-cattle. It is because of people like you and the people on this site and the right-wing that humanity will NOT make it passed "The Great Filter"

Insulting others has never made someone change their mind on a complex matter, I believe you cannot learn from people who only agree with you user. I don't know why you are hostile to this, and I never really divulged my opinions on any political ideology. I brang up two very poor leaders as an example of why it is more than a one-sided issue. I understand you disagree with my point that communism is mainly a monetary system, though it mainly speaks on redistribution of wealth. That's okay, if you supply me information I'm more than willing to read it later.

Anyway, what do you think about the dangers of nanotechnology?

Technology is becoming more and more complex, normies are becoming more retarded and jews are becoming gayer. A dangerous combination.

>Insulting others has never made someone change their mind
You are a retard.

Can confirm. I am a jew and last night I inexplicably became gayer. Can't figure it our for the life of me, but it happened.

I think your insults speak more about your thought process than others. I don't hate you or think you're dumb as I do not know you. To be insulted by someone you must respect someone, and I don't know you as you don't know me or my beliefs. If you are easily insulted you are easily persuaded. Thank you for your time though user, even if you hate me.

OK retard, you're welcome.

Well, I'm not angry with you, but you're wasting an awful lot of time with ad-hominem attacks on someone you think you cannot get through to. You still have not posted anything to support your point to which I am more than willing to read upon.

Take the electrode neural stimulatory jabs goy, it’s for a better tomorrow goy

Attached: 313B57BE-C8FF-4468-BC57-837E93F59D54.jpg (1125x1062, 642.03K)

Thanks for the contribution fren, I'll read through it.

Easier life (even easier than before), more acceptance of your faggotry, … until the 50’s you spent a lot of effort to pretend you were straight.

Pretty sure life in the 50s here in the US under more or less socialism was a lot easier than it is now under free market lolbertarianism

Unfortunately, these threads are constantly being slid and derailed.
youtube.com/watch?v=hmNzf9ztnAk
I'll add another video subject, albeit it be slightly off-topic which I find interesting.

Imagine what other contaminants and byproducts are from the manufacturing process that you just put unadultured in your body.

I try not to, this is why I am asking about this subject. Some things are thousands of years old, fluoride, which is bad, but we evolved with it, things such as Radium, etc. However this is all much newer.

Why would you WANT to downplay it?

Attached: GlobalCatastrophicRisks.png (1124x388, 28.38K)