why every time there is a thread about fake moon landing a bunch of flat Earthers mysteriously appear in the thread and start muddying the waters?
Who gives a shit if the Earth is flat or not, we are talking about a specific topic about whether manned landing on moon happened. It's a different topic.
This is a sign that the topic triggers some gay jews, the same happens with gangstalking, adrenochrome and other topics. Maybe the footage really is fake.
Alexander Rivera
Ever wondered why your thread gets shoahd on NASA all the time despite the fact that NASA is a government agency that received tax funding archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/337820145/
This here states on page 7 that NASA basically is just the public sector of the military spaceprogram and pretty much underlies it making me think its even more likely that NASA is mostly just a front to cover up the military program cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP85-00821R000100110007-7.pdf
Also: Why hasnt this (pic related with adjusted contrast and brightness) been closer looked at? This very well could indicate that at one point there was sophisticated life on Mars, yet they seem to just ignore it. Here is the original pic from the NASA website mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00184/mcam/0184MR0925102000E1_DXXX.jpg
There are also a bunch of NASA footages where you see bubbles rising up "in space", but the video I had doesnt exist and would have to search for a new one first.
>inb4 flat earther There are multiple reasons on why they could fake things which all have nothing to do with flat earth. They could try to hide Ay lmaos, secret military space programm, some hidden continent the elites use as their small paradise, some openings in the polar regions (Hollow Earth) or a sheme where they say nasa gets 20 billion a year, but will only get a few million for some fakery, coke and hookers, while the rest is used for blackprojects like some false flags, some coups against a government that doesnt want to be a puppet, or said military space programm
Either way I believe NASA isnt there to provide us any information.
Also im not saying we didnt go to the moon, nor that we cant go into space or anything like that. All im saying is they arent showing is real footage, or at least often not real footage. Some possible reasons: >van allen belt would have destroyed the tapes either way, and a moonlanding without footage wouldnt be good propaganda >they feared it could go wrong and thus made fake footage in order to cover an eventual failure up and still sell it as success >something is on the moon we arent supposed to know about >we really didnt go to the moon
Also weird that you never see a complete orbit around the earth on their livestream. Usually whenever it gets dark, like so dark you dont even see lights from the cities anymore (which you should unless they shot up the crappiest camera you can find into space) the stream cuts off and continues when its bright day again. In this one it seems to be the other way around, starting the clip when its dark to see the light come up, which eventually cuts right back to a complete dark earth. youtube.com/watch?v=EEIk7gwjgIM
>Who gives a shit if the Earth is flat or not, how many fucking times have you seen other retards repeating this? Are you literally braindead? Are you even a real person? How the fuck are you still asking this? Actual retard.
Brandon Robinson
Threads about Antarctica too.
Gabriel Scott
>flat earthers is obvious psyop ALL THROUGH FUCKING HISTORY EVERYONE WAS A FLAT EARTHER, MORON YOU TRUST THE "FRATERNITY'S" "SCIENTISTS" OF THE LAST 100 YEARS OVER ALL HISTORY ACTUAL FUCKING RETARD
Benjamin Kelly
Maybe bc the thing about Flat Earth is that anyone can use the SCIENTIFIC METHOD to prove that earth is flat and motionless simply by performing some very basic experiments themselves such as the curvature test, or attempting to measure for stellar parallax. The main reason why most intelligent people haven’t yet noticed that earth is flat, and space is obviously fake and gay, is bc Jewtube and Jewgle are hiding legit flat earth info with their algorithms. Also, “The Flat Earth Society” is a Masonic disinfo campaign. You can use these playlists to bypass (((their))) algo’s and to answer any questions you may have about the FE model:
If you are truly interested in finding the truth, these interviews/debates are great resources to hear both sides of the argument and then construct an informed opinion of your own on the matter.
>Who gives a shit if the Earth is flat or no Gee idk... >ARE YOU LITERALLY IN GOD'S SNOWGLOBE PLAYING A GAME OF LIFE WITH ETERNAL CONSEQUENCES, MADE BY A DESIGNER??? >OR A MOTE OF DUST, LOST IN AN INFINITE VORTEX, WITH NO ORIENTATION, NO UP, DOWN, RIGHT, OR WRONG?
FUCK ME THE >SHAPE DOESNT MATTER THO FUCKING PLEBS DONT THINK BEFORE POSTING
>It's a different topic. No, it is not. The moon is not a planet. It is a plasma field. No one CAN walk on it. It is part of your Sci-Fi space fantasy which you love more than God. You love the lie and hate to hear the Truth.
I don’t care about the moon, I don’t care about flat earth. Both are outside of my control, I’m only interested in things I can influence. Now kindly fuck off
Hunter Scott
>t. Fell for the “it’s a psyop” psyop
The basic fact of the matter is that Flat Earthers aren’t telling you anything you can’t verify for yourself. unlike the heliocentric model, you don’t need to trust in authority figures and technology that you cant verify yourself in order to verify FE arguments. ANY LEGITIMATE FLAT EARTHER WILL TELL YOU THE EXACT SAME ADVICE: which is to literally go outside and look for yourself instead of beLIEving anyone else on the matter. the best part the Truth of our world is you don’t need to believe me or any user on a Cambodian basket weaving forum or any jewtube video .
You can go outside YOURSELF with a pair of binoculars and find a large body of water and conduct the curvature experiment for YOURSELF.
Again, you dont have to believe flat earthers bc you can actually verify with your own senses and God-given common sense all the information you’re being told. BELIEF IS THE ENEMY OF KNOWING
Also, it doesnt make sense as a psyop. It has the exact opposite affect (((they))) would want on people. It turns life from nihilistic and meaningless into infinitely meaningful . It turns people into the ultimate independent thinkers. It strongly points to a creator which causes people to live a better happier healthier life and not live in fear. Flat earthers do not let themselves be controlled or ultimately ruled over by government bs because they only answer to their creator. Nobody in the FE movement is falling for any government psyop bs. We know not to trust (((them))) and we are spiritually empowered. Worst gov Psyop idea ever.
AGAIN, DONT BELIEVE FLAT EARTHERS. GO VERIFY FOR YOURSELF
This is another default reply of the jews, but there are reflectors on the moon and probably other man-made items.
Cooper Ramirez
who says my faith and recognition of Gods work is dependent on the shape of the earth? also in fact i have the stance that the earth is a hollow sphere archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/356712611/
Christians are generally pro-science and don't believe in disk earth.
Robert Turner
There is the North Pole Inner Earth Expedition (NPIEE) which tries to find out wether there is a hole on the north pole or not. I didnt look into this much yet, but there are rumors about it being canceled twice due to sudden deaths of the leading expeditioner. This is what i could find so far
x2-radio.com/phoenixsciencefoundation/npiee/history.html >By 2005, the team had grown to 22 members, but required 100 members to fund the voyage. In 2006, Steven Currey tragically passed away and was succeeded by launch manager and PhD Physicist, Brooks Agnew.
x2-radio.com/phoenixsciencefoundation/npiee/updates.html >After the sudden and strange disappearance of the the Park Avenue, New York film production company that previously had announced its plans to fund the expedition to make a documentary, we have regrouped and decided to run an Indiegogo crowdfunding campaign
better dont announce such an expidition i guess
pic related is of the southpole which you find here history.nasa.gov/SP-168/section1.htm >[31] "The ESSA III satellite was in a 750-mile altitude, circular orbit, inclined approximately 79° retrograde to provide Sun synchronism. Each picture covers approximately 3000000 square miles of the Earth's surface. In order to provide geographic location of meteorological phenomena, each picture was routinely gridded at ESSA in a latitude-longitude matrix. The South Pole and the Antarctic region are clearly visible in the concentric circles in each of the lower pictures. Africa and the Near East are readily recognized in the central portion of the mosaic.
now allegedly there is a hole in the middle as the satellite didnt cross directly over the southpole, but i have yet to see a real pic of the south pole
Some stuff on the moon: history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-12-3.html >They all worked well, with one exception, and were really producing useful data. One unexpected result came from the seismic experiment recording the impact of Intrepid on the surface after we had jettisoned it. The entire Moon rang like a gong, vibrating and resonating for almost on hour after the impact. i like to believe the moon is hollow. and while we are at oddities about the moon:
Irwin Shapiro, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics >“The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist.’ >"The Moon is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be. It occupies an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties are none of them could be considered remotely watertight."
Christopher Knight and Alan Bulter Book: Who Built the Moon? >The Moon has astonishing synchronicity with the Sun. When the Sun is at its lowest and weakest in mid-winter, the Moon is at its highest and brightest, and the reverse occurs in mid-summer. Both set at the same point on the horizon at the equinoxes and at the opposite point at the solstices. What are the chances that the Moon would naturally find an orbit so perfect that it would cover the Sun at an eclipse and appear from Earth to be the same size? What are chances that the alignments would be so perfect at the equinoxes and solstices?
Isaac Asimov, American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University and Science Fiction writer. Asimov was one of the most prolific writers of all time. >"We cannot help but come to the conclusion that the Moon by rights ought not to be there. The fact that it is, is one of the strokes of luck almost too good to accept… Small planets, such as Earth, with weak gravitational fields, might well lack satellites… … In general then, when a planet does have satellites, those satellites are much smaller than the planet itself. Therefore, even if the Earth has a satellite, there would be every reason to suspect… that at best it would be a tiny world, perhaps 30 miles in diameter. But that is not so. Earth not only has a satellite, but it is a giant satellite, 2160 miles in diameter. How is it then, that tiny Earth has one? Amazing.
The fist guy actually would rather argue that the moon doesnt exist than to admit it was placed and created by something intelligent (God?)
Ian James
No, I don't deny that the Earth is round. For now. I haven't done a lot of research. And furthermore, I don't care enough to research it. I don't deny that we have satellites etc.
I only deny that astronauts have done past the Earth's magnetic field and have thereby been exposed to solar radiation and still survived and even came back to Earth.
Lucas Long
>if you need the earth to be flat I don’t. It just is flat, And that is an undeniable fact of reality. It also happens to makes a lot more sense that this world that we inhabit is the entire universe rather than it just being a tiny fragment is an infinitely vast and empty space vacuum.
The Heliocentric deception is being propagated by those who worship Satan. God absolutely exists and He would never have created a universe such as the the satanic mainstream claims: >you evolved from pond scum >you are an evolutionary fluke >nothing more than a decendant from a mutated retarded fish-frog-monkey baby >you are just a speck of nothing >orbiting the sun at 66600 mph >tilted at 66.6 degrees >on a ball that curves .666 ft per mile >hurtling thru vast empty nothingness >infinite universe, billions of planets, >you are not special >you are lost in the infinite empty void of space
God’s true creation is not random happenstance isolated to a remote meaningless speck of rock in an infinite universe created from nothing. reality is not diluted 99.999999...% by the empty vacuum of space. This is an absolutely blasphemous worldview Satan has constructed for the gullible and weak of spirit.
The Truth is the difference between ultimate nihilism vs. ultimate purpose and meaning in life. In reality (You) were specially designed and put here by a creator. Your decisions and life have ultimate infinite meaning and purpose. (You) are part of God’s great design and (((they))) don’t want capable, spiritually empowered, healthy people who know they have a spark of The Divine within them.
you can send them therr by unmaned missions though. personally i believe we went there, though we were shown fake footage and images, either to hide thr real tech used, to hide whats up there, as a fail safe in case of failure or simply becauae the van allen belt would have destroyed all images and videos recorded when passing through
Evan Rivera
Yes I feel like generally flat earth threads pop up whenever you're on to something. They came in droves during the Tonga eruption too