What is the mindset of a small government-type that wants a ban on pit bulls?

What is the mindset of a small government-type that wants a ban on pit bulls?

Attached: Pitbull.png (1000x1000, 443.46K)

what ever fagot, shooting dogs is funny as fuck lmfao

I took a fat shit a few minutes ago and that was more informative than this thread. Don't feel bad, keep trying.

Guns don't have free will. If I leave my safe unlocked, the gun isn't going to jump out and bite a child. Shitbulls will just run up to random people and maul them.
Pit bulls get adopted out to families as a family dog. They're given to kids to play with. I don't hand a loaded gun to a kid to cuddle with.

Attached: pcxogwdtz1l61.jpg (1632x1232, 250.96K)

I cant come up with anything. I suppose the natural right of self protection would also apply to pitbull ownership, it's quite possible that the pitbull is a greater tool of protection than the firearm, percentage wise.

>I took a fat shit a few minutes ago and that was more informative than this thread.

That's because you're a retard that feels lost and confused when you click on a Any Forums thread that's not about BBC porn.

It's not. Pitbulls are bad at protecting because their brains are wired for fighting rings. Pitbulls are a good reason to carry a weapon on you.

>what ever fagot, shooting dogs is funny as fuck lmfao
/thread

Attached: FPBP vsvirgin OP.jpg (509x423, 38.54K)

pit bull are the nigger of dog. Banning nigger is based therefore banning pitbull is based. All the death related to gun are probably nigger related too. The world has a nigger problem, not a gun problem.

Their presense alone is a major deterrent to those seeking to assault or rob others though I would imagine and although hard to quantify the deterrent factor vs 38 deaths might statistically be far more effective in crime prevention than firearms

>Their presense alone is a major deterrent to those seeking to assault or rob others
No its not, violent criminals are not afraid of dogs. Pitbulls are shit, there is no reason for them to exist.

Guns are supposed to kill people, dogs are supposed to maul toddlers.

>meme flag
You're the typical cuck with a small dog that immediately runs back to their car when I walk into the park with my pitbull.

Right wing chud incels want their guns to feel like they have power. Notice how every chud has a gun collection but fits a certain phenotype.

Attached: 1643477876891.png (1360x770, 334.51K)

Now give the numbers on pets killed by pitbulls. Also give us the percentage of the dog population that pitbulls represent relative to their percentage of bites & killings.
Hint: 4% of dog pop, 80% of bites, 84% of murders.
And its thousands of pets killed yearly by shitbulls.

I'll kill your pitbull in 1 second if it tries to bite me and then I'll give you my address so that you can mail me the bill.

Paul has become gigachad and should never give up on his chadness.

>small government
>totalitarian power
monarchists or some other kind of dictatorship, obviously

Attached: totally not a bot.jpg (884x571, 56.73K)

i just want to be able to shoot them and their owners without government interference

FpBp

Put bulls shouldn't be a problem if everyone were armed.

indeed, we should kick niggers out, that would reduce gun crime by 90%

Niggers kill more people than pitbulls, we already know this, the solution is the same for both problem.

A pitbull should weigh no more than 20kg, 30kg max if from a weight pulling line that openly had introduction of Dogue de Bordeaux blood.

20kg is ultimately a small dog

>gun used in crime, owner held responsible
Because pitbull owners are never held to the same responsibility level despite parroting the idea that a bad dog is only due to a bad owner. No, a dog is a sentient animal that has a will of its own. And in this case it's a dog bred for violence and often snaps unexpectedly. I'm not for small government anymore, I want a logical society that doesn't try to run itself off a cliff.

Attached: J10.jpg (300x430, 31.36K)

Attached: j88.jpg (800x851, 233.95K)

I don't want to ban pitbulls? What's the insight of op being a faggot?

The Tiananmen Square protests, known as the June Fourth Incident (Chinese: 六四事件; pinyin: liùsì shìjiàn) in China, were student-led demonstrations held in Tiananmen Square, Beijing during 1989. In what is known as the Tiananmen Square Massacre (Chinese: 天安门大屠杀; pinyin: Tiān'ānmén dà túshā), troops armed with assault rifles and accompanied by tanks fired at the demonstrators and those trying to block the military's advance into Tiananmen Square. The protests started on 15 April and were forcibly suppressed on 4 June when the government declared martial law and sent the People's Liberation Army to occupy parts of central Beijing. Estimates of the death toll vary from several hundred to several thousand, with thousands more wounded.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The popular national movement inspired by the Beijing protests is sometimes called the '89 Democracy Movement (Chinese: 八九民运; pinyin: Bājiǔ mínyùn) or the Tiananmen Square Incident (Chinese: 天安门事件; pinyin: Tiān'ānmén shìjiàn).

difference is Guns are actually useful whereas Pits are just a worthless nig tier dog known for rippoing their owners to shreds.