THE GREAT NATSOC GENERAL卐 It's that time again! Time for the eternal NatSoc General!
EVERY DAY, EVERY NIGHT IT IS YOUR DUTY TO KEEP THIS GENERAL ALIVE. GIVE A BUMP!
Thread for discussion of National Socialism, Fascism, Rexism, Falangism, the Third Position and Racial Identity Movements. Traditionalism in art and society can also be discussed. Share links, PDFs, reading, videos, and propaganda.
In addition, the thread is also dedicated to self-improvement in the physical and the mental realm as well as practical skills and general life advice.
> RULES OF ENGAGEMENT: > 卐 - DO NOT REPLY TO DIVIDERS, GATEKEEPERS, MEMEFLAGS, NO-TRUE-SCOTSMEN AND SPREADERS OF MISINFORMATION! - 卐 > 卐 - DO NOT NEEDLESSLY HARASS OTHER NATIONAL SOCIALISTS- 卐 > 卐 - PEOPLE DOING UNWANTED IMAGE-DUMPS OR SPAMMING ARE TO BE CONSIDERED SHILLS - 卐
Always remember to be respectful towards fellow National Socialists
i got banned from Any Forums for saying the holocaust didnt happen. not only did the holocuast not happen, it is perfectly lawful for me to say so in england. what gives with the Any Forums janny? is he a yid?
>Runners were usually low-ranking non-commissioned officers, such as corporals, who were chosen for their fitness, stamina and ability to read maps, Cart explains. They also had to be tough and resourceful enough to find their destination in any sort of weather, and sufficiently lithe and agile to navigate obstacles. As they ventured beyond their unit’s position, they faced the risk of being shot or blown up before they got there, or on the way back.
>Of all the jobs in the infantry, “the runner’s job was the hardest and most dangerous,” World War I veteran Lt. Allan L. Dexter observed in a 1931 newspaper article. “With a runner, it was merely a question of how long he would last before being wounded or killed.”
>Those who volunteered for the job of runner were regarded with great respect by others who served. As Elton Mackin wrote in his memoir Suddenly We Didn’t Want to Die: Memoirs of a World War I Marine, “A fellow didn’t have to take a runner’s job. All a fellow had to do was say no. Except in a pinch, when there was neither time nor choice, no one served as a runner except a volunteer, for many vital things depended upon the men carrying the messages.”
my great grandad was a ww1 runner too in the somme and then north italy fighting the austro-hungarians. they were extra exposed to sniper and artillery fire
Isaac Thompson
~358843816 >No argument >Pathetic attempt of mockery Yep checks out
Redpilled bulgarian: Whenever you make a good thread that really strikes deep into their insecurities, they will not attempt to argue because they just cannot and will be used for ridicule in the same thread What they do instead is they pull any criticism at all that they can think of to discredit you without explicitly carrying the baggage of them admitting that they're leftists or shills. They just blend in and critique you without much sense. This is called, quite literally, Critical Theory. It is the main weapon of the modern progressive's arsenal. Critical theory says that you critique the thing without trying to engage it on an equal stage where it can argue, and by critiquing and ridiculing it without much sense you'd plant the seed of doubt within its supporters and make them question it.
This is implemented right now as I'm speaking in America. The US curriculum now has a mandatory Critical Race Theory ingrained within it. Critical Race Theory stands for what I wrote above, except that the target is specifically white people. It critiques the whites, without allowing them to defend themselves because you do not defend yourself from something that your teacher is told to read in front of the class, with the sole purpose of shaking up inter-racial support within white groups so as to weaken them.
In fact this Critical Theory tactic can be seen everywhere with a leftist presence. Have you noticed how every single eceleb or a right wing politician here is mocked and critiqued, sometimes for very cartoonish reasons? Yeah, you're not immune to this either. However let me tell you a little secret. Critical Theory isn't immune from itself too. This is what they're all scared of, the few of us who realize that the entirety of postmodernism can be inverted and turned on itself with a critique so vicious that it will only lead to a Hitler on steroids. What you're doing in this thread - pointing the jew out - is literally critical theory too. This scares them a lot.
I proposed a logic way to enact racial segregation: >Philosophy as a mandatory way of living: Search for an immediate response in help of Civilizations, World Peace and Meaning
>Philosophy is the requirement for every civilization as no civilization can be created without symbols that unite its citizens to partake in the very same civilization, such that could be described as an ideology. Today we also use philosophy, although unknowingly to entertain a meaning of our life. For an example, a popular philosophy is that of authenticity which is derived from Existentialism. The problem is that philosophies are taken for granted and are not withstanding any scrutiny by it’s believers. That’s where the distinction begins. Philosophy, as it’s translation from ancient Greek is defined as love of wisdom. Following the meaning of the definition we come to the conclusion that you don’t actually love wisdom if you refuse to put everything through all forms of scrutiny as it exposes your unwillingness to find the truth and thus love of wisdom. This is the reason why we need to live in world wide philosophical societies, such that every human is able and required to fully contemplate their actions and it’s consequences. Without philosophy we cannot live in a coherent way in this construct we have as of now unless we have reached an objective truth or something absolute that can show us the perfect way to live. I label it as incoherent because in a society that doesn’t embrace philosophy instead forces us to rely on random cultural influence and biological determinism that accepts only basic emotions as truth which leads to chaotic, irrational and deadly actions. 1/2
Connor Ross
This is why we need to embrace living in a civilization and understand our duty of being philosophers. The only way to achieve this is by racially segregating people in the best climate for them. The very idea of ethnic diversity is flawed because it tries to mix people with very different features which creates unforeseen results and low trust societies. Through racial segregation people can become self-aware of their positive and negative ethnical and environmental qualities that prevent them from being philosophers, prevent unexpected behavior and strive to negate all negative qualities. For now, this sounds like the most reasonable and humane way to achieve world peace. In a world where people love wisdom and find their meaning of life by being philosophers who investigate the meaning of life and their problems while sharing it globally looks closer to virtuous living than in such that refuses to acknowledge it. Mandatory philosophical education for all ages that is focused on understanding and criticism is the most reasonable choice we can make in this age.
>In defence of of racial segregation and exposing it’s denial as an empowerment of short-lived consumerist anti-intellectual societies and slavery
>Racial segregation is required not just for a peaceful world but also for one to exist at all, or to be more clear, the one we refer to as a modern civilization. Without racial segregation we are experiencing a massacre of people adapted to live in a civilization by such that are not-adapted to it, or to say rather adapted at surviving in impoverished settings. It explains why they can’t plan long term and lack impulse control. This in turn leads to an impoosible amount of not just experience but also of genetic adaptation that they can’t catch up with. The very idea of racial diversity stems from preying behavior that wants to maximize profit and lower the cost as immigrants get paid less and could be easily manipulated to work more for less which can be traced even back to Rome, Egypt and other civilizations that got destroyed in the end by the very same immigrants. Another thing is that these people are better consumers because they are more impulsive and are willing to get in debt even for luxury items that they don’t need to survive. This results in culture decline in these countries they immigrate to. From high culture hubs that praise virtuous people who strive for perfection to such that are vulgar and anti-intellectual, more accommodated to the immigrants that are supposed to come in need and peace. The end result of immigration leads to the host being a minority in their own countries and even losing it’s power which can lead to it’s genocide. Racial segregation the only reasonable way we can stop racial hatred and embrace high culture and self-perfection as they are vital to peaceful societies.
>Such positions are not isolationists in economical and intellectual sense, the very opposite, this way they will be able to actually help developing countries to catch up and become self sufficient, immigration also results in brain drain which is fatal for these developing countries. The concept of racial segeragtion is not such of hatred, it’s one in which we can properly navigate the problems in our own communities more easily. It’s very ironic that these same people who vouch against their fallacious notion of racism are the very same people who would let immigrants get paid insultingly low wages and live in terrible conditions that lead to bigger complications and false hopes in the long term rather than help them become self sustaining in their own countries. It seems like their goal is to make them dependent.
This New shill tactic isn’t working at all. It also doubly not works when all of you trannies spam this shit in unison on every board whenever dolf is brought up.
Caleb Rivera
>I think the italian front was pretty much constantly switching hands Also a frontline where often a whole hills were ruined in order to eliminate resistance nests >one of the Piave River battles in 1917-1918. Well he was quite a lucky one mine granduncle almost fell in saint michele as AH machine gunner
Carter Miller
Hitler was proven right of course. His spirit haunts the failing judaified husk of western civilization to this day.
Kayden Wood
>The thing or person who believe in is [insert political or racial idelogy thats opposed to yours]
Get a new tactoic shill. Beeing arguing all day with kikes on Any Forums about how christianity is jewish.
Nolan Edwards
~358844125 >Oh look haavara agreement happened that means he was shabbos goyim and i post one of the orient swastikas
Hitler opposed Haavara agreement (because he knew what would happen then) and instead wanted to lock them on madagascar.