Would he have done good things for this country, or was he always a meme?

Would he have done good things for this country, or was he always a meme?

Attached: rp.jpg (1189x1491, 928.23K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/si4GaQWmdrQ
youtu.be/nhUIhli71XI
youtu.be/BM1ot_2ehjc
youtu.be/Yhvy6P-sj2A
youtu.be/e-E8Ex1bgmQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Benton#Ron_Paul_presidential_campaign
kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article110863942.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Yes.

he was based cringe

Yes.

He would have dismantled our fighter jets into plowshares and put those welfare leeching niggers to work.

Attached: Nature.webm (640x640, 1.5M)

>put those welfare leeching niggers to work
Would never happen, not without a literal wizard. There's no speech a President can give or a policy he can make that would change their fundamental nature and biological reality.

Attached: this man is 35.webm (710x400, 2.59M)

He wanted to rip the bandaid off. Instead we are left to schemes of obfuscation.
Audit the Fed.

He would have done great things and thus.. he will always be a meme. Very sad how these things work out in a corrupt system.

Probably ended wars for one. He would make good progress but there would've been roadblocks.

I would like to think so, but even with Ron Paul, there were some red flags. Peter Thiel, a Bilderberg Group meeting attendee, was one of the people funding his campaign. I've heard rumors that Ron Paul was a Knight of Malta. I haven't seen any confirmation on that one, though. But when you look at the grand picture, it seems very plausible that he was just another form of controlled opposition. He helped wake a lot of people up, but a lot of those people never really progressed beyond that step. There are still people at the Misses Institute who supported him who will criticize central banking, fiat money, the boom-bust business cycle, etc. However, if you tried to talk to them about different aspects of the NWO like the Rothschilds, the Council on Foreign Relations, Chatham House, etc, they would disassociate themselves from you and call you a conspiracy theorist. I know that most people on Any Forums hate libertarianism, and there are some legitimate criticisms to make; especially in regards to the moral degradation aspect that occur if there are no religious constraints on your society. However, libertarianism more than any ideology at least focused on putting controls on government through separation of powers, states rights and constitutional rights prohibiting government actions. There are CFR Foreign Affairs articles like Richard Gardner's "Hard Road to World Order" that talks specifically about how to get around people's constitutional rights and sovereignty with a bottom up rather than top down approach. So those rights have served as a big roadblock to governmental overreach, but they're been whittled away with the Fabian Strategy of incrementalism for centuries now. But if you look into some of the people in the libertarian movement like the jew Ludwig Von Mises, you will see that he was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

These people fund, control and misdirect every political philosophy. It's very naïve to think that Ron Paul would have been allowed to do what he did if he wasn't controlled. It's not the early 1900s anymore where Senators and Congressman spoke out against the Federal Reserve and voted against the ratifying U.S. entry into the League of Nations. Those times are gone. And even some of those politicians like Louis McFadden appear to have been taken out by these powers for speaking out. They've proven that they will kill sitting presidents if they need to for their agenda, even if it is just different factions of the NWO fighting over a particular issue (Catholics vs Anglos over control of Cuba for instance). And there's more ways than ever to take someone out now. Weapons that don't even leave a trace. Yet he was never touched... Again, I could be wrong... I'd like to be wrong. That was an optimistic time for our community... but in the end, just like always... it didn't produce any good whatsoever. It just wasted our time and let their agenda develop even further. Just like for the retards that fell for Trump.

ron paul, Any Forums

Please explain to me why religious participation in early America was far more robust than any Western European nation, even though critics said that without a national religion people would lose their moral compass.

Libertarian doesn't mean a thing doesn't get done, it only means that the doing is done by the people, not by the government. As it turns out, libertarianism is not degeneracy, even if many who promote the beliefs today are degenerates. People look for God and morals in their own way, and it turns out that when left to their own devices instead of being compelled by a State, people are more earnest, more aggressive in their beliefs. (When the State compels this people will simply go through the motions and religion will stagnate, just as economies stagnate.)

In any case, your point about libertarians resisting NWO stuff is well taken. (And we're only speaking of the good kind, the Austrian school paleo-libertarians of the Mises variety.) However, everyone resists the reality that a cabal of billionaire jews with an ethnic hatred for white people ruling Western Civilization right now. Decades of propaganda from these same Jews have shaped the culture this way, and even now people of all ideological perspectives struggle to accept this truth.

It's stunning really, a kind of mass delusion. For it is very easy to verify the grossly disproportionate power of the jews in media and banking, and yet to even discuss that power, to even admit it, is taboo. Yes, the jewish elite invested heavily in creating this taboo.

Attached: 1621892692988.jpg (1125x1111, 250.4K)

You are a very stupid, cynical, ill-read person. I won't even begin to detail how fucking stupid this comment is, for you aren't worth the time it would take.

Race realism is great, but at least know something about politics and economics before you burp out such drivel.

I see a lot of ad hominem attacks but nothing else. No, I'm not ill-read. I'm books, documents and articles written by the Fabian Socialists, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Council on Foreign Relations, Chatham House, the Bolshevik leaders, the scientific elite from the Royal society, Central intelligence agency material, scientific papers, U.S. Army War college material, World Economic Forum stuff and much more. Going around accusing people of being ignorant, when you know nothing about them, just because they offended your sensitive sensibilities makes you look like a toddler throwing a temper tantrum. if you want to address something I said specifically, do so. But spare me the stupid personal attacks.

I've read books*

blah

>Please explain to me why religious participation in early America was far more robust than any Western European nation, even though critics said that without a national religion people would lose their moral compass.
I don't think you have to necessarily have a theocracy to uphold religious principles. That's not what I was implying. But I will say that this kind of system is only as good as the morals of the people living within in. There are a lot of modern libertarians who see the system only as a function of economic greed and technological process. Kaczynski was right about his criticism of conservatives who fail to recognize that new technologies and inventions inevitably change the culture which undermines the traditions they claim to want to preserve. Some of the founding fathers said that this kind of system could only work in agrarian society rather than an industrial one. Anyway, all I'm saying, and I think you'd probably agree with me on this... there has to be some kind of moral restraints but on behavior. I believe in individual liberty, but you can't have people dressing up like furries in public or having gay pride parades in front of children. The "live and let live" philosophy is great but it can be taken too far when it promotes degeneracy to the next generation. That's all I meant. I do think those kind of morality laws should be created from local self-government rather than the federal government, though. You can't give the feds that kind of power.

Oh, okay, it was you that made both those posts. Then you're just a douchebag. Have fun with that, I guess.

Based. States need the power back. The fed is probably not gonna give it up though. There are exceptions to personal freedom in regards to children. Punishments need to come from some philosophical doctrine, and it needs to come from the holy books. It needs to come off as secular as not to expand those exceptions.

baste

In the end though, the only pragmatic way to end these political tensions is to make moving tons easier. Nations already exist. Immigration for political reasons needs to become the norm.

>he fell for the ron paul meme

I did, back then. I think a lot of what he said would happen turned out to be true. Ross Perot too.

Well, I'm sorry to be so blunt but when you make such retarded speculations about Ron Paul, well, you're an idiot.

For instance, "...would have been allowed to do what he did if he wasn't controlled." Do you think every person in politics is controlled, and that Ron couldn't "do what he did" unless he was controlled? That is a level of distortion that is simply detached from reality.

He was able to do what he did because he was practically standing alone, a weirdo, an eccentric, and not exercising enough power aside from becoming 'Dr. No' for rejecting all unconstitutional legislation- which was pretty much all of it.

Once Ron Paul ran for President, then his ideas were getting more circulation and threatening to take the power of the Presidency, so the knives came out.

youtu.be/si4GaQWmdrQ

And there's the "it just wasted our time and let their agenda develop even further." I hate when smug, ill-read cunts talk like this.

So the one guy in congress who pushed closest to the line of getting the general public to question the globalist elite, just short of saying "it's the jews," which entailed demanding an audit of the Fed and explaining the mechanics of our serfdom and the corruption of people like Soros and Krugman and the neo-Cons, etc. is a "waste of time." Right. One of the only honest politicians and with a political platform that would massively improved the nation while simultaneously moving the Overton window so the general public could connect the dots to the globalist elite.

Yeah, your stupidity pisses me off. So glib for you to speak like an idiot.

Attached: Ron Paul.jpg (1200x804, 198.79K)

youre hiding behind books. synthesize your own ideas and add something to the conversation, instead of quoting dead juice.

Read the context.

Shut the fuck up, retard. You know nothing. Get off the internet and read a book.

yeah and he got there by learning austrian economics, but that's not the meme. you all were lead like lambs to the slaughter by a hypocrite. he stuffed every bill full of pork for his district and voted against it, knowing full well it would pass anyway. Dr No, my ass.

"stuffed every bill full of pork for his district." That's such a fucking lie. Shut the fuck up, you dumb cunt.

The media machine smeared Ron Paul for being a hypocrite because he voted for bills that gave Federal funds to his district. Ron Paul explained this many times, saying that he was against such spending, but if public money was being taken by the government in such a redistribution, it is unfair that his district is denied their share simply because he is against such spending on principle. However, in every way he was trying to eliminate such spending altogether.

Yet you read some jew buzzfeed huffington shit article and think you know something. We wouldn't have a single liberty-oriented politician who could hold office if that meant their district would get screwed out of Federal funds while the socialist shitheads take all the public monies.

go say that post out loud in front of a mirror, you fucking retard. jfc

He probably doesn't know how federal funds/taxes work.

Attached: sasfd.png (304x299, 10.86K)

I don't think there's any hypocrisy in being against over taxation and pork, but also trying to get the best deal you can for the people who elected you. I don't agree with welfare, but if I was offered it, I would accept it, because it's my money, and I might as well recoup some of what was taken. Likewise, if that district is being taxed, and their money taken, the moral thing to do is to return what you can. That's playing the game how you find it, nothing to do with also recognizing that the game is corrupt and unsustainable.

He would have been a nice breathe of fresh air, but we would have immediately went back to the globalist agenda with both parties asleep.

Trump being a meme machine was a literal God send for politics. He drove everyone so insane they showed their true colors. There's no more hiding behind mass media, "decorum" or leaving the politics to the "experts." Everyone gets to see how batshit insane or corrupt our leaders actually are.

>federal funds
I meant how federal taxes are given back to the states.

I learned a lot from Ron Paul, but everything he taught me about money turned out to be an oversimplification or outright false. Borrowing creates money, but he never mentions that the repayment of debt destroys money. Instead he says the fed is "printing" money which is quite misleading.

Reminder

Attached: 7555445.jpg (828x1024, 526.98K)

>I hate when smug, ill-read cunts talk like this.
Yeah, you don't sound smug at all.

I already pointed out that this guy was funded by a Bilderberg Group member. That is a fact. Do you have any idea how many think tanks, NGOs, tax-exempt foundations, universities, advocacy groups, religious organizations, etc, are involved in this system? Do you think that they just were just unaware of who Ron Paul was before his more successful presidential runs? Do you think he just somehow slipped through the cracks while garnering enough of a local following to be able to win multiple congressional campaigns? They absolutely knew who this guy was. The best way to neutralize someone is not to give them negative media attention. It's to give them no attention whatsoever in a total media blackout. Now, that did happen at times with Ron Paul. When they would announce who came in 1st and 3rd in a primary but not who came in 2nd. But they spent a lot of time attacking him directly. This guy was allowed to go up on stage at presidential debates and talk about the Council on Foreign Relations and the North American Union. The elite have absolutely killed politicians and journalists for less when they felt they were legitimate threats to whatever it was they're doing.

I'm not saying that it's 100% impossible that he was legit. But you do have to question why this guy was allowed to be promoted the way he was by guys on Fox News like Andrew Peter Napolitano and John Stossel.

Anyway, I have provided my own viewpoints. I find it funny that you accuse me of being ill-read and then suddenly say I'm hiding behind books and not providing my own ideas. Which is it? If you think Ron Paul was legit, that's fine. I'm just saying that there are some red flags.

Attached: 6556745.jpg (1024x692, 448.73K)

What??? Are sure you aren't still confused?

>total media blackout
understatement of the century
youtu.be/nhUIhli71XI

Attached: 1643418957739.jpg (650x650, 91.79K)

Keep in mind this was in 2011

Attached: 7467557.jpg (2048x2040, 1.71M)

I don't get your point?

Anyone not actively pro-white can only put lipstick on a pig

You're an idiot. He got funding from a guy with libertarian sympathies. Not everyone is a globalist, you dingbat. In any case, Ron Paul showed a consistency of principle throughout his career and there is no reason to believe he was pandering to any donor. Compare this to a typical Biden or Pelosi or most Republicans, and see how their words and voting record are grossly mismatched, and how even their stated opinions waffle all over the place, decade to decade. (Video evidence proving their lies and contradictions and yet they keep getting elected- or become President, in Biden's case.)

Also, the machine literally ghosted the guy until he gained too much popularity, then they attacked him at every turn. The typical modus operandi.

Trump was also someone hated by the elite, but he coasted along unmolested at first because they never thought he would gain traction. It wasn't until he looked like someone the public would actually take seriously that the machine kicked into gear and it was anti-Trump messaging 24/7.

Again, if you know anything about Ron Paul's career, about his principles and the consistency with which he exhibited those principles, and how his principles are utterly at odds with the globalist elite, then you would never say jackass nonsense about him being controlled opposition and "a waste of time."

Also, I'm not the guy who said you are hiding behind books. I say you are narrowly read, ie ill-read.

Attached: Tree of Liberty Refreshed5.jpg (509x550, 66.64K)

what are some issues ron and rand differ on?

Yes, I remember all that, user. He was absolutely censored in mainstream media that was aimed at normies. But there were guys like I mentioned like Andrew Peter Napolitano, John Stossel and Ben Swann who did give him quite a lot of publicity. These guys worked for the same massive media conglomerates. Of course, they would have to mention his name at some point if he somehow just managed to push through purely by popular support. But it seemed like he was being pushed by a lot of people in the mainstream media that were seen as being "outside the system" but were still being funded by these same corporations. Let me tell you something that I can say for a fact. These media conglomerates are very much top down organizations with multiple methods of censorship. There's censorship from the CEO/board of directors level. There's censorship from advertisers putting pressure on them. There's censorship from your editor. And eventually there becomes self-censorship when you learn what kind of topics you're allowed to talk and what kind of topics will lead you to getting fired. It's like these people who think Tucker Carlson is legit just because he occasionally talks about some real shit that nobody else mentions. But if this guy was a real threat, he would be dealt with by the Murdoch family and fired. James Murdoch is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations for example. That's all I'm saying. You can present someone as an anti-media, anti-establishment candidate... but still give them enough coverage that the more "politically awake" segments of the public know who they are.

jfc you guys keep it pithy

Attached: 1642972697663.png (1024x1024, 250.78K)

>Also, I'm not the guy who said you are hiding behind books. I say you are narrowly read, ie ill-read.

No, you don't. You're throwing a temper tantrum like a child because I don't agree with you. You're being a faggot right now, but I imagine that's how you always act when someone doesn't agree with you. That's how you're acting to everyone in this thread. Anyway, I'm not interested in a dick measuring contest, but I'm pretty confident that I've read higher level geo-political books, articles, reports and documents than you have. Have you even read a single Council on Foreign Relations' Foreign Affairs article? Just be honest. I actually read what these globalists write themselves.

just because americans were too stupid to vote for him doesnt make him a meme

I was never a big Trump guy, but I think this informed a lot of what he did with regards to being so bombastic and just trolling the media, he knew they were ratings driven, but that they were willing and able to just shut someone out if they weren't in the script, so he had to make sure he was a spectacle. As much as people act like it would have been politically poison, Ron Paul might have actually helped himself out to say "faggot" or something for the cameras.

Ron Paul had enormous public support, which was only growing. This is because when people actually listened to, or read, the arguments, Ron Paul made a lot more sense than the establishment shills.

At this time FOX got some more libertarian voices in the mix (where before there had basically just been Stossel). Yeah, they helped bolster the movement, but where are they now? They were marginalized or completely exiled.

Napolitano was talking about the Federal Reserve- he inexplicitly got the axe with the reasoning being "he didn't fit the format of FOX business." Right, he was the highest rated show on FOX business at the time, but they had to axe him for that. And not give him any other show on FOX news. Bullshit.

Beck was beloved by the media for initially supporting neo-con nonsense, but he turned. Beck became a huge liberty guy and started talking about the Federal reserve. Suddenly he wasn't a loveable buffoon to spoonfeed establishment swill, he was a threat. So they immediately branded him as "crazy" and booted him off the air.

And they effectively nullified Ron Paul.

In any case, your argument is that of a dumb person. You only look at conspiratorial connections and guilt by association and other such "evidence," without considering principles, and what principles/people are genuinely a threat and are therefore removed.

Ron Paul was a repository of ideas dangerous to the globalist establishment. Had his momentum not been arbitrarily diminished we could be living in an entirely different reality right now. The redpilling alone from a Ron Paul presidency would have been massive.

Attached: 1626847389895.jpg (1024x768, 150.34K)

Attached: 1632454830074.gif (800x592, 2.6M)

See, this is why I said it isn't worth responding to you. Look at the cogent, substantive retorts I have given, analyzing your bullshit. But you're stupid, so all that reduces to a "temper tantrum." That's you, a stupid person, projecting what makes you feel good.

The proverbial pearls before swine to reason with an idiot.

Also, "...I've read higher level geo-political books, articles, reports and documents" is some of the most midwit bullshit I've heard in a long time.

>Look at the cogent, substantive retorts I have given
Kek. Okay, dude. I'm retarded, and you're a genius. Anyone who disagrees with you is an idiot and is ill-read. You really proved your point here.

Yes, I did prove my point. That is obvious when comparing our comments.

Also, in addition to childish exaggeration you're straw-manning now? It went from me being a genius (childish exaggeration, never said this) and you being retarded, to "anyone who disagrees" with me being an idiot and ill-read. (A strawman.)

No. I'm just saying that YOU, specifically just you, are ill-read and talking stupid shit about Ron Paul.

I know it makes you feel better to imagine me having a tantrum and raging over everyone on earth being a retard and me the only "genius," but this is all your idiot fantasy.

That you feel the need to speak this way confirms everything I assumed about you from your very first comment. Against my better judgement, my inductive reasoning, I engaged you anyway.

ron paul is controlled opposition, he coauthored his 1993 book the case for gold with lewis leland, who was a big dog in pnac, wrote their reports etc. durrr

Explain exactly how the ideas in 'The Case for Gold' make Ron Paul "controlled opposition." Or is it simply guilt by association because of how this or that person represents something symbolic in your own head?

Can any of you "Ron Paul is controlled opposition" speak in terms of principles rather than associations?

If Ron Paul was anything he was principled and relentlessly consistent in his principles. It makes no sense that he is "controlled opposition" if the principles he espoused were extremely threatening to the globalists.

Can any of you dummies square this circle?

Attached: 1615750766801.jpg (684x431, 60.94K)

Very interesting, user...

This has got to be some sock puppet shit going on. How utterly retarded.

these posts answers your question to me well enough if they are in congress they are controlled oppo, the main way being that they take AIPAC/jew money and won't name the jew

just like how trump won the chabad tree of life award in like 1983 then his daughter married a satanic elite kike who destroyed his admin from within but trump had to keep sucking jared off lol, cos trump was in debt to the rothschilds thru their proxy, his financial savior, the banker wilbur ross, from like 1994. and the low iq band of the right wing spectrum falls for such shit everytime, thats why only high iq high-systematizing autists who can understand how the world actually works should be able to vote, and again we just get back to plato saying only the philosophers (i.e. autists) should be politicians

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You're the same guy! Fuuuuuck you!!! I'm laughing my ass off right now. Well, that's pretty funny.

Even promoting your own rambling comment from before! HAHAHAHA!

Oh, that's great. You're not entirely wrong, though. I do agree with some of your rambling nonsense, it's not all crazy by any means. But again, you're a narrowly read person. Very shallow and not quite in touch with reality.

Attached: 1625148737301.jpg (493x640, 33.93K)

I respect nazis more than I do anarchists and liberals. Atleast they respect authority. Well atleast they do in theory. How do we undo the damage democracy has done to people's psyche?

Attached: damn.jpg (410x464, 78.87K)

By the way, do you vaguely realize that if you weren't a LOW IQ AUTIST, but an actual high IQ autist, you wouldn't be so utterly transparent to me, and your views would be strangely distorted?

Does that register in your cloudy brain at all?

whatever dude ive only posted twice itt this is 3rd

Right, because there was no such thing as authority in the American experiment with minimal government or the Western nations who took the same course. You know, all exceptional and prosperous nations to live in, even as the commies were starving by the millions because of their shitty, authoritarian hellscape.

Hey! Have you cut off your cock and balls yet, commie?

Attached: 1623208099360.jpg (1280x854, 490.73K)

>cos trump was in debt to the rothschilds thru their proxy, his financial savior, the banker wilbur ross, from like 1994. and the low iq band of the right wing spectrum falls for such shit everytime.

It always amazed me that nobody cared about this connection. The same people that claimed to oppose the Rothschild banking dynasty had no problem with them loaning Trump money and restructuring his debt, then later on him appointing Wilbur Ross as Secretary of Commerce as compensation for that. Not to mention Jared Kushner going to Bilderberg meetings. I mean, you'd have to be pretty retarded to think a billionaire wouldn't be part of the NWO system to begin with, but even if were willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, you just had to look at the people he appointed. He didn't have anywhere near as many CFR members in his cabinet as Bush, Obama and Biden put in. However, they were still there. Some of them were well hidden in the Deputy Secretary roles. You'd have to believe Trump was a complete fucking idiot to be unaware of these things. I appreciate your other post, user. The PNAC book connection was very interesting...

Oh, I wouldn't deny this Trump connection to the banking elite. More recently, Soros himself forgave Trump a rather substantial debt.

But this thread isn't about Trump, who is more complex than merely dismissing him on account of being a buffoon with questionable principles and loyalties. This thread is about Ron Paul.

Attached: 1614010953615.jpg (1024x664, 83.75K)

the only reason communism didn't work was because it wasn't tried in modern America.

Attached: download (14).jpg (228x221, 8.71K)

Yes, surely here it will work, comrade. The people will dictate the terms of their own labor and all will be paid equitably! This time it will not stall at the authoritarian stage, but reach the glorious destination of the socialist paradise!

Attached: 1609997705842.jpg (577x608, 54.88K)

cheers mate

dont get me wrong fren i agree with most of ron pauls positions from what i understand of them, like the basic principle that no fiat money system has lasted more than a few hundred years hence gold and silver are stores of real value, and thus the fed's money printing should end, but yeah, at this point the whole system needs to be destroyed and rebuilt because its been so heavily infiltrated by controlled oppos such as the RINOs, let alone jews, ccp etc.

you're going to become an ubi serf that lives in pods, eats bugs and owns a virtual house hooked to a facebook vr headset

Attached: itstime.jpg (1387x700, 214.86K)

>wizard
I think you missed his point Ron is a wizard

Oh yes, indeed! I can imagine it now! I will finally get the courage to slap the tendies from mom's hands and tell her to fuck off! I'm part of the people's revolution and someday there will be equity in this world!

Attached: 1641289057924.jpg (640x404, 45.24K)

>dig the fucking hole!
>sluurp

Attached: moving-a-big-load.jpg (345x330, 30.54K)

congress would've spent 4-8 years doing everything it could to fuck him over, think trump but different political goals and less "Trump tells CNN to fuck off" on TV and more "Old man politely asks for more senate votes, gets ignored"

>disingenuous fascist

Attached: 1486377957451.png (460x480, 146.33K)

Virtuous communist shortages would help make that fatass a lot more skinny and healthy. 3 grasshoppers for lunch then it's back to work!

Attached: Soviet Store.jpg (700x471, 134.1K)

this shit edit doesn't even make sense.

Attached: 1502531738735.jpg (460x480, 59.09K)

today I will remind them

youtu.be/BM1ot_2ehjc

remember those sad commercials about poor foreigners?
yeah

youtu.be/Yhvy6P-sj2A

Nazis always lose
You were made for gulag

Pod living! How delightful! So greedy and capitalist to have any more than a pod! So glad the media are on our side, the people's side!

I know, it's horrrrrible, all the poverty. And some idiots think the USA has the fattest poor people in the world! What they don't understand is that after we continue importing millions of foreigners with no skills, and the great reset is fully realized, the economy will be in shambles and then we will have our very own starving poor!

Attached: 1638146755759.jpg (720x725, 218.22K)

>When I use memes they are true, when you do it its not because reasons

Attached: communists then vs communists now soviets antifa tranny.jpg (567x567, 40.34K)

I can keep going

youtu.be/e-E8Ex1bgmQ

they didn't just send nazis to the gulags though, did they?

He was actually based. His campaign office was caught posting merchant memes.

the us has more prisoners at any given time than the soviet union had gulags at any given time
>but stalin
Was trying to turn dirt into an industrial superpower with shovels and hammers. Does that apply to the modern america?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Benton#Ron_Paul_presidential_campaign

Federal complaint filed against Jesse Benton over undercover video

kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article110863942.html

Attached: Benton.jpg (1140x641, 55.29K)

He would set the country on a correct philosophical path, this would been invaluable progress.

I love how an analysis like that focuses on just the stuff the globalists will approve. We didn't "protect our jobs," when that always translates to more government legislation and more picking of winners and losers.

>No mention of how flooding the labor market with millions of low/no-skill workers shits up the economy, driving down wages and increasing public expenditures. (California has been bankrupt for decades thanks to this alone.)
>No mention of the Federal Reserve money printing, which parasitizes the middle class with inflation.
>No mention of the bailouts and special legislation to big money interests, including (and especially) banks, which the people must collectively pay for and which makes us all poorer.
>No attention given to the grotesquely wasteful spending of domestic programs that never delivered on their promises but which continue forever. (To paraphrase: "Government grows... liberty cedes.")
>No mention of the military industrial complex and the incredible waste of public money from this.
>No mention of the billions we gush all over the world to push our political weight around, usually for purposes that have nothing to do with American prosperity or security and everything to do with aggrandizing the elite
>No mention of the biological fact of race and how blacks (and to a lesser extent Hispanics) are simply low intelligence and plagued by communal problems that the entire country must collectively pay for, including increased welfare and more public services to pay for their crime.

All of this has made us poorer and yet we're still one of the wealthiest nations with a high quality of life for most... at least for now.

Note how NONE of these listed above capitalist, none of it is free market. It is all the degeneracy in our system.

Anyone who thinks communism is the answer because "capitalism failed" is a drooling retard.

Attached: 1643353741247.jpg (734x619, 221.19K)

libertarianism is globalism on steroids

No. This is propaganda. The new libertarianism corrupted by the left is "globalism on steroids," but this corruption is not limited to libertarianism. It's fair to say that every major ideology has been similarly corrupted, except a subset of nationalists who rose with the tea party (ie Ron Paul) movement and Trump.

As you may know, there was a split between neo-conservatives and paleo-conservatives, with the former being refugees from the left who came to warmonger on the right and basically corrupt conservatism to be even MORE globalist.

Same thing happened among libertarians. The libertarians who uphold the actual classical liberal tradition, and include some who are anarcho-capitalists, are the paleo-libertarians.

Of course, this distinction only started being used when libertarianism became infested with open-borders, pro-abortion lefties who think every human is an interchangeable economic unit.

Ron Paul is not the globalist kind of libertarianism any more than a Republic nationalist like Buchanan, who opposed the Iraq war, is a neoconservative. But you'll continue to spread this lie because it suits your own retarded ideological bias.

Attached: 1625282261494.png (5000x7500, 1.81M)