Did Jesus really love THE gays?

did Jesus really love THE gays?

Attached: 1661673305764582.jpg (960x960, 65.41K)

God's love for me but not for thee

actually thats an interesting question. did jesus have original sin? does that mean even god has sinned? does god worship himself faithfully and beg for his own forgiveness lest he send himself to hell?

Jesus was neither poor nor homeless, nor a refugee. Did any of these people ever open the Bible?

Jesus might not have said anything about homosexuals directly, but Paul's opinions on gays make Any Forums look like liberals. lmao

>lest he send himself to hell?
Jesus never talked about hell, this is Catholic revisionism and a trick to make people loyal to the church while also getting money from them.

he was born in a barn, I guess yeah he wasnt poor, but he was a refugee duing his childhood when he was escaping the childkiller king whos name escapes me.

neat

He was from the high priest family, his family had servants. They also were not refugees, they were still within their own country. They were hiding from their own government inside their own country.

>brown
Why do tards treat this is a fact? There is no mention of his skin color in the scriptures

He means the Egypt story

Hell is one of the main things Jesus talks about. It's constantly mentioned and described.

Luke 16:23
Mark 9:43
Matt. 13:42
etc.

So, that was still withing the boundaries of the greater Roman empire, it was like an American from Texas running to Georgia.

false nonsense

#notmydeity

Ellaphae is the Way! )*

Attached: 33CEBDF2-4F03-46A4-AD1C-01B425FEB552.jpg (512x512, 44.86K)

The roman empire was as cohesive in culture and people as America
What are you drinking give us some too seems to be fun.

huh cool, I guess we are all going to hell then

No. He did not love anyone.
That's just a meme peddled by his happy cult salesmen who realized that fire and brimstone preaching doesn't really sell the story anymore.

ily kass

Jesus did not endorse whoring or tax gathering, but He ate with them anyway. In the New Testament it is also stated that neither effeminate nor homosexuals nor adulterers nor drunkards nor liars would achieve the Kingdom of Heaven, as that is not manifesting the works of the Holy Spirit within you.
Uh, no. Egypt was radically different from Judea and Samaria and both were very different from Rome itself. It's very questionable whether "national" borders would apply here or how really applicable the modern notion of "nation" as applied to the Westphalian nation-state would. They weren't Roman citizens, that's for sure.

>He was from the high priest family, his family had servants
Damn, I was taught he was a carpenter, just a normal kind of guy. I'm from England though. Is this like a thing from that weird American christianity where instead of worshipping in an old, quite austere building, you go to like a megachurch constructed by churchco(tax exempt) and they spend half the time preaching about how it's great to be really rich and telling you to vote as right wing as possible

>I was taught he was a carpenter, just a normal kind of guy.
There's scholary debate about that what is translated as carpenter originally meant architect instead. That automatically implies literacy and an education in at least mathematics.

is this like the same thing where they try and reinterpret the camel getting through the eye of a needle quote