What's (your) accent, user?

What's (your) accent, user?

Attached: Accent.png (1006x864, 140.97K)

Other urls found in this thread:

voca.ro/15kguOp1NXnZ
twitter.com/AnonBabble

voca.ro/15kguOp1NXnZ

Attached: 3a3ef16305c4213ea081e0e667df7389.jpg (1073x1500, 210.6K)

I repress the autogynephilia of my birthplace. But it does sometimes slip out, and in moments of excitement or disinhibition I give myself away. Those who have an educated ear can tell where I'm originally from, even those most people assume I'm husstuss.

Why did the previous thread get deleted? Is Blanchardology forbidden knowledge now?

AGP and HSTS scholars are keepers of forbidden lore.

i dunno why it was deleted

can i message him to get prophiled or something

As long as you’re into men it’s fine. Plenty of woman have “AGP”, but the thing that separates them from AGP creeps is that they are still into men.

i still have no idea of what this means

This is a good thing.

new janny apparently doesn't think Blanchard is on topic now.

Inb4 pruning

>Plenty of woman have “AGP”
This is always ridiculous to read as AGP.

Gay Blanchard

Not all AGPs are the same. Interpersonal/meta-attracted AGPs are closer to women.

So you think there are "pure" interpersonal/meta-attracted AGPs with no transvestic/physical AGP? That seems unlikely to me because I experience all the types of it.

Well, yeah, they also have physical aspects. But the entire thing tends to he more subtle then “getting off in your sisters panties”. The libido is alot more focused on romance, just like cis woman.

But yes, there is still the component of wanting to have physical female characteristics.

You are creating a difference where isn't any.

I’ve interacted with a lot of AGPs on this board and there is clearly a difference. I even made an entire thread about it and people mostly agreed that there was a difference.

I can get off to sister's panties exactly the same as to interpersonal/meta-attraction stuff. The base of the attraction is the same.

Obviously there are shades of gray. But there is a big difference between the AGPs who are extremely sexual and fetishistic, and the ones who have a more subtle sexuality based on deep emotional connections. I can name other differences, but this is one of the biggest ones.

Also, apparently most AGPs have little/no interest in men. So being genuinely meta-attracted does set you apart.

Maybe the difference is just testosterone level. Meta-atraction isn't really a genuine interest in a man. A man can be just a faceless prop in it.

Uh, that’s not how meta-attraction works. It has to be with an attractive man, it could never work with a fat ugly man. But the defining feature of it is that the most important aspect is the deep emotional connection, so the sex is extremely emotionally charged and not just soulless porn sex.

took me a minute to get what he meant
god i'm retarded i want to kill myself

Okay we're back on track. I don't know what happened to the original thread.

I'm the gay male hsts who was saying there has to be something different between myself and other feminine homosexual males who have ne desire to transition.

I know it's partly self-selection based on physical conformation. However, I have known some very feminine short gay males who would look better as females, yet never showed any interest in being female. Some of them were never interested in drag.

I think answering the question is important to understanding the difference between hsts and feminine homosexual men.

The man doesn't really matter. It is never a real, detailed person. The focus is completely on the woman. There is no need for emotional connection or any other bullshit. There is no good or bad AGP, just AGP.