Imagine saying something like this and not immediately noticing that that discrepancy means your work probably has...

Imagine saying something like this and not immediately noticing that that discrepancy means your work probably has fundamental flaws you need to address

Attached: Screenshot_20220822-130927.jpg (1080x946, 218.55K)

Attacking Blanchard is definitely an AGP behaviour.

stfu tranny!
blanchard is our god!

ray is like the definition of a twitter midwit
he constantly gives the most tepid 'hot takes' imaginable

>that is more variable in its manifestations
Yeah, cause that based retard calls just about anything you could think of AGP, lol

maybe this tard will reconsider his stupid bullshit that ignores transbian realities

In all fairness, even though his agp/hsts theory has been widely respected for decades after it's publishing, there doesn't really seem to be any other major researchers that have picked up the torch to continue his work. He published his stuff like 45 years ago now and there's been nearly no major updates to it since then. Usually you would expect further refinement of his dichotomy by other academics but just crickets.

His theory is perfect and complete, it doesn't require any revision.

>ignores transbian realities
I'm pretty sure everyone wants to do that

What transbian realities are ignored by Blanchard?