anyone else obsessively compulsed to find the deeper meaning of the lgbt I have slaved over this question for at least an entire decade now and my research has gotten me kicked out of anti-lgbt spaces for being a tranny AND kicked out of trans spaces for being a transphobe. I'm running out of places to even test my theories but I'm pretty sure I might be developing some sort of paranoid disorder because believe it or not when you slave over human sexuality for 10 years straight it starts to eat away at your sanity watching other people be so blind to their own displays of libido.
Anyone else obsessively compulsed to find the deeper meaning of the lgbt I have slaved over this question for at least...
lets hear your schizo theories user
This is me but for being a tranny and I'm only 6 years in so the madness is only softcore atm
What's on your mind OP?
I looked and found it
I had a little schizo project about refuting the blanchard dichotomy and exploring the posibilities, origins and meaning of autophilias. I got like 1/3 of the way and dropped it
>I have slaved over this question for at least an entire decade now
have you read any queer theory or is this just like another case of schizo repper rationalizes his inherent attraction to queer spaces as an investigation?
>queer theory
thats all bullshit made up by retarded women
misogyny is cringe
what do the sets and distributions represent user?
lmao this hit op a little close to home
nta but my problem with queer theory is that it usually downplays biology to a significant degree. it's hard to discuss cause and effect when the entire space still tends to deny sex differences.
It's scribbles and not real engeering: from top left and left to right top to bottom:
1. When you are alone, the way in which a dialogue of doubting or a dialogue of continuous stream-of-consciousness is generated is via two halves of your brain literally stimulating themselves and then "guess-and-checking" the two halves against one another. So for example if you sit alone in your room and pretend to debate yourself in your internal monologue or if you are on a walk and thinking to yourself, this is LITERALLY activation of Broca's area (the part responsible for forming connections to individual words) and Wernick's area (the part responsible for forming connections to strings of words together to form coherent meaning) going back and forth from the right half of the brain to the left in order to sus out incorrect assumptions that do not line up. If everything you thought was perfectly deductively true and provable via modal logic and formal semantics, then two identical symmetrics halves of your brain should be able to parse identical meaning. That's not quite how the real world works
2. For this reason, assuming that you HAVE an identity (sexual identity, gender identity, etc.) that would mean that your identity should and could be better represented as a wave-function where over time your exact perception of yourself forever changes as if wave-like things were chaotically dynamically interacting with one another to produce an identity. What's shown in the diagram is how you can look in a mirror, receieve an emergent phenomenal perception of your self, then look away and experience the representational phenomena seem to shift and change as you ask yourself "what was I like in the mirror" and then forever doubt yourself until you turn around again to collapse the wave function.
3. Now that we can better describe the identity as a wave we can do Feynman diagrams and identify two kinds of gender carrying particles. Gender fermions and gender bosons.
reee fremions get out
So in this pic related we can see that A and B are gender fermions and j and k are gender bosons. In this diagram two people are interacting and exchanging gender bosons with one another. They come together from wave-like and then when interacting the appearance of particle-like gender is produced.
pic related would be an attempt to produce some sort of standard model of gender bosons. There would be of course the OBVIOUS ones such as:
naturally occuring sight: 2ndary sexual characteristics, anatomical differences, etc.
manmade sign: color-identifiers, etc.
2 just sounds like the mirror stage
>Lacan lives
Oh no..
The reason this is all so important is because what none of you retards understand is that GENDER SAF;LJKAFSDJKL;ASDFJKL; GENDER IDENTIFIERS AND GENDER BOSONS PRODUCE THE ILLUSIONS OF GENDER FERMIONS EXISTING SUCH THAT NONREAL PHANTOM PARTICLES MIGHT INFLUENCE BHEAVIOR YOU DONT UNDERSTAND the entire pool of information the tnntire
I dont know how to explain it it's so fucking stupid that nobody realizes what is going on with NEotany and the proliferation of the LGBT because what's going on here is that the nucleus accumbens is supposed to suppress the prefrontal cortex's production of dopamine spikes via amygdala activation for cortisol to prevent action but the more you stupid fucking retards spend your entire lives sexualizing eachother as soon aas you hit puberty instead of seprateing societal roles of sexuality to prevent burnout the more you get shit like this
Bitch stop calling me a retard and drop the manifesto. Im not a physics to know your fundamental particle jargon it is on you to explain it first
It's complicated to explain I started obsessing over how the two halves of the brain connect after I had this classmate with a partial-hemispherectomy
At the risk of oversimplifying: the two halves of the brain WILL try sending signals back and forth to find out where and how and why there are differences between the two. It's also how you can autopilot through tasks as if you were thinking about something else, one half of the brain can take over and run wild while the other half of the brain sits back and monitors itself without sending output. You notice the noise, you notice the disconnect, but you don't perceive the parts where the two halves of the brain line up perfectly as anything but mono-tone brainwaves.
This is why the cognitive abilities of the recipients of radical hemispherectomies are so fascinating. Some can go on to be expert linguists despite having literally half a brain missing, and it's why my classmate was a savant-mathematician because you don't need the back half of the brain connected together in order to do math, only the front half. Meanwhile he was autistic as fuck because the back half of his brain couldn't sort itself out and weed out mistakes due to the partial hemispherectomy.
Forgive me for being rarted because I'm a computer scientist and nothing else. Sounds similar to the concept of generative adversarial networks, in which two networks compete in a feedback loop to converge on a local optima. I suppose in that case, that's our perception of the self and the world.
Makes sense it can be modeled as a wave, as everything can be kek. It's interesting trying to wholly quantify and measure the influences of such. I support this experiment, although the scope is quite large lmao.
Would such a model suggest that gender is inherently ingrained into our psyche/brain from birth? I suppose external factors/influences/experiences can act to provide energy and influence the amplitude of the waves, but I wonder as to what exactly provides the 'identity' function so to speak, the initial starting state.
Wavey theory user.
>Sounds similar to the concept of generative adversarial networks, in which two networks compete in a feedback loop to converge on a local optima
This is exactly a good analog
> I suppose in that case, that's our perception of the self and the world.
This part is supposed to explain why.
When you are interacting with someone, something strange happens the two halves of the brain seem to attempt to try to segregate tasks between looking at the other person, to judge intent, and looking at yourself, to produce intent. As a result, when you are actually WITH someone your brain isn't second-guessing yourself, instead it's simply assuming the other person is for you and you are for them and the illusion that you really understand someone is produced as if you understood their intentions including how they intend to present themselves
But then when you walk away? the illusion is broken and you're back to doubting yourself. The red parts are the parts where the gender fermion is wave-like between instances where it is collapsed. The pink parts represent the gender-quantum-information that is sent off into the system
This is why well-communicable gender identities are so important and why pronouns need to be reduced to digits. 0 1 2 3 or it they she he. If it's ANYTHING analog then it's broken down and degraded over time. If it's digital (and compressible) then it's able to be perceived perfectly and communication is maintained.
This is why I am going paranoid and why I'm convinced I can see into the mind of Ted K on the day he went into that gender clinic. In nature the ONLY information processing systems would be your self and other humans. In today's society there are super-behemoth-god-like information processing things can that chew us up and spit out the most insane perceptions of our selves imaginable. It's fucking horrifying. I want to be a node in a network of humans, not at the mercy of capitalist-prime-intellect.