The science is in: Transgirls are real

The science is in: Transgirls are real.

Attached: science.jpg (828x946, 309.18K)

That's right chud, facts don't care about your feelings. :)

Attached: 1614477837016.jpg (1200x1600, 160.51K)

absolute waifu, one of the hottest tranners I've ever seen on this board

the LGBT(tm) identity is based on science and evidence, not even heterosexuality is backed by as much Hard data. so instead of relying on sexual repression and christian religious superstition you should catch up to the 21st century and embrace an identity based on Love based on objective scientific and psychiatric authority

Attached: stock-photo-doctor-with-syringe-in-hands-and-flag-on-background-lgbt-people-296454959.jpg (1500x1119, 410.09K)

who? my cock needs to know

>this makes the chud seethe and shit their pants in autistic agony

Attached: science 2.jpg (828x1064, 367.8K)

cool but i do not care about science very much at all outside of its use as a tool
i don't think knowledge stems from science, instead all knowledge stems from the pleroma

yup every single condition is totally real now don't forget to buy our special medications for it

Attached: 1641527636286.webm (320x568, 1.73M)

get off of ssris and start taking vitamin d supplements and working out

cutie

u/peach_trap

You are a retard with a confirmation bias. Exceptional cases of chromosomal malfunctions that lead to intersex conditions do not disprove the rule that women (women) have a womb and ovaries and men (men) have testicles and a penis. And your "science" especially doesn't magically validate circumstantially and culturally-induced psychotic delusions :3

happy its finally been confirmed

>not even heterosexuality is backed by as much Hard data
what did he mean by this?

How does science prove that are you are real women instead of men with a currently incurable neurological disorder and are being ‘treated’ with mutilation?

Have you ever seen a heterosexual person? I haven’t, so I don’t believe they’re real.

There used to be a lot of them, but then sexy transgirls turned all of them bisexual.

If there are exceptions of any sort, then there are exceptions, period. When people like you carve out exceptions for people with intersex conditions, it betrays the arbitrariness and impurity of your supposedly "strict" "biological" definitions of "woman" and "man". Inclusive definitions don't require making half the excuses for their terms that yours does.

The science is in: Transgirls are valid

Okay then, I'll define my terms clearly: If the organism has a y chromosome, then it is male, regardless of whatever else structurally occurs in the rare instance of an intersex condition. Outside of identifying that yes, intersex people can in fact exist, I don't see what broader point you're trying to get at here.

*human rather than organism. I'm exclusively talking about humans here

>le science....... le GOOD

Attached: bald fuck.jpg (1429x2048, 282.96K)

in 20 years scientists are going to think we were insane for using ssris as first line treatment instead of amphetamine and similar stimulants

gay men pretending to be women aren't real in the sense that they aren't different from other gay men except in their denial of gay identity and their compulsion to self-harm and castrate themselves

Attached: 1654819717845.jpg (729x487, 33.97K)

But they're a lot happier, isn't that the important thing?

Attached: HSTS couples.jpg (601x472, 125.75K)

no they arent theyd be happier being gay in an accepting society, people only transition when they feel socially excluded for being gay

The fuck you on about? Any society that's pro-trans is automatically pro-gay also by baseline. Which is pretty much all of them these days btw.