Serious question

If a woman has sex without consent with another woman is rape?

Attached: images (80).jpg (462x664, 43.97K)

Yes. Duh.

idk even know its fine its not like sex is always consensual anyways

t. rape victummm

yes

Yes, unless you ask a radical leftist, then they will tell you only men can rape people

Rape requires penis, contact with vagina and vagina is not rape! Contact, finger, dildo and vagina is not rape. So Lily Cade didn't rape anyone

So "rape fxf" is sex sorry rape victim

You're actually braindead

No

Yes is not the answer, you have to talk about it.

Women can't rape, they're too hot for that, they deserve all the sex they want

Luffy power bottoms Law

fite me

> they deserve all the sex they want

Well it's not really sex, is it? Following from this logic
>Rape requires penis
Because rape is the act of forceful sex
>sex requires penis

Therefore, all exclusive lesbians are virgin.

And don't try to say that it requires a penis due to the element of force, I'm already working on a rebuttal for that. Once I'm finished, I'll start describing how Luffy and Law will utilize their respective Devil Fruit powers for sex.

Father, he/she doesn't know what he/she is talking about.

We are talking about the laws, which in Brazil, for example, require a phallus, but not all sexual relations need it, or we are not talking about oral sex, non-penetrative sex, but we are not talking about rape that does not require a phallus. You're a fundashi/fujoshi, aren't you?

requires a penis due to the element of force
Hokay, so
>rape requires penis because it is the "force" component of sex.
>it exerts its force through spatial displacement of vaginal tissue.

Therefore, any physical entity that enters the vagina satisfies this criteria by performing the pre-requisite function of force exertion.

Also
>rape requires penis because force is derived psychologically from the nature of the male sex drive
Which means transmen can rape without a penis if they're taking enough testosterone.

Enjoy being a rapist, sorry, "sex-enjoyer" than, rape-user

>You're a fundashi/fujoshi, aren't you?
Surprisingly enough I didn'tget into that, I convinced myself at a young age that it was unrealistic to expect happiness from a romantic partner (thank you, parents (dad)).

>We are talking about the laws, which in Brazil, for example, require a phallus, but not all sexual relations need it, or we are not talking about oral sex, non-penetrative sex, but we are not talking about rape that does not require a phallus.
I'm really sorry, but I don't think I could decipher that many logical operator clauses even if I wasn't stoned.

Not because it's not a phallus, that's what the laws specify, they don't talk about sexual desire or anything that enters the vagina, a finger could enter the vagina of an adult woman, without her consent not being considered rape, but a I speak, yes. A dildo is not a phallus, so it's not rape, that's what the laws say. And most of the time it is not open to interpretation.
If that doesn't work as an argument
i am right and you are wrong

I only harass girls on discord, I'm not a perverted "rapist".

Sometimes happiness is not easy to achieve, but you have to allow yourself to enjoy the experiences, maybe you don't love it, but maybe you will find a close type of sexual or romantic happiness.

I think there's been a miscommunication. Are you saying this as a descriptive statement of fact, or as a normative prescription of this being the ideal way of things?

>i am right
I mean if you're arguing that what you do can never be sexually inappropriate, you are definitely that-way-leaning.

>maybe you will find a close type of sexual or romantic happiness.

Attached: burning_woody.jpg (841x725, 55.18K)

Both, as a fact and as a description, and this is not exclusive!
Yes, what I do is never inappropriate, nor is what Lily Cade did inappropriate! Some people just cannot respond to crimes!

Attached: images (82).jpg (522x522, 68.33K)

Believe in love!