there is literally nothing wrong with only being willing to date cis people of your preferred gender. totally understandable. there should be a term for that. but super straight is not the term. super straight, in practice, means you feel that way *and you're a transphobe*. that may not be what it's *supposed* to mean, but that's how it's used, so that's what it means. trans-exclusionary heterosexuality needs a new name not co-opted by transphobes. the nonexistence of such a term, as a status quo, is heterophobic against trans-exclusionary heterosexuals; the absence of any better label, with less baggage, implies they are all transphobes, when in fact they aren't. so super straight is transphobic *and* heterophobic.
Super straight is transphobic
Mason Hughes
Bentley Gutierrez
hair color preference should not be included in sexuality
super straight is retarded
thinking not dating troons is transphobic is retarded
just say 'i dont date trannies'
everyone shut the fuck up
Parker Sanchez
It's still not a sexuality. You can't smell her chromosomes.
Cooper Morales
super straight was a psyop orchestrated to paint trannies as rapists and that's why everyone stopped caring about it after two weeks
Xavier Edwards
>just say 'i dont date trannies'
the problem is we haven't come up with a way to say that other than the way that got taken over by and/or was maliciously orchestrated by transphobes
Isaac Foster
Agree with OP. I’m not saying it’s transphobic to not be attracted to trans people, but every “superstraight” social media account I saw when that trend was going on would post shit that was unambiguously, undeniably transphobic.
Matthew Johnson
Bentley Morris
Justin Ortiz
Preferences are valid, but "super straights" are without doubt the kind of snowflakes who get triggered at the sight of a rainbow.
Aaron Gray
everyday is newfag day in Any Forums
Ethan Turner
Jace Carter
mods should honestly ban anyone from posting until theyve been here for 3+ months and not echochamber themselves into one board
Levi Martinez
because anyone who says it is objectively in the wrong. you are rejecting a diverse range of women before even meeting them just because they are trans. that is the definition of transphobic.
normal people date women and if one happens to be trans and they’re uncomfortable with it just says theyre not interested but keeps an open mind. loser internet males have to make a “sexuality” around denying all trans people because they’re asseholes lol
Ryan Parker
Jackson Thomas
>there is literally nothing wrong with only being willing to date cis people of your preferred gender. totally understandable. there should be a term for that.
there is, it's "straight" or "gay"
if you date trannies you are not gay or straight, you're bisexual. superstraight/supergay are retarded and so is anyone who uses them.
Joseph Mitchell
kys bot newfag
sage
Robert Smith
your life is your personal property and no one's platform or service. who you allow to be a part of it is your decision alone, and denying someone entry on any stupid basis or none at all can't reasonably be called discrimination or hate speech.
if we were talking about selling cakes i'd say you're onto something but this is dating
Henry Williams
Thomas Edwards
fair enough, but this is a semantic argument centered on my use of “discrimination”. saying “i won’t date black people” isn’t discrimination, but it is racism. saying “i won’t date trans women” isn’t discrimination but it is transphobic. there are bounds on what can reasonably be considered a preference without being an asshole. normal people don’t need a sexuality to reject an entire group of people without meeting them. they do it on a case by case basis because that’s how dating works since every person is different and you don’t know what you’re going to get
Aaron Thompson
this is gonna sound like it's supposed to be a /qa/-tier meme arrow quote, but it's not, i'm being unironic:
i don't think that's racism.
i think sexual preferences need to be largely a justified blind spot for social justice. i think it's perfectly okay to have arbitrary dating boundaries that unfairly rule out large swarths of people you haven't even met, because it's dating. if it were almost anything else, it wouldn't be okay, but it's dating, so it is.
Jonathan Long
i guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. within those groups there is a wide range of people and you are basically saying “i won’t even consider the possibility of even going on a date with this person because [insert stereotype here]”. In order to hold that position where you will deny an entire group, you must have some internalized belief about everyone who is of that group that is negative. otherwise you would just reject people on a case by case basis, even if it is for the same reason