Why do conservatives think that the existence of gays is somehow an existential threat? I don't get it, how?

Why do conservatives think that the existence of gays is somehow an existential threat? I don't get it, how?

Attached: h.jpg (250x194, 6.06K)

something something weak men

something something hard times

Moral degeneracy bullshit and big strong man leader worship

they don;t. thats just jewish propaganda. and people always fall for divisive propaganda.

There's actually a lot of diverse reasons and some of them are at least internally consistent.

Religion: if you assume that Abrahamic religions are right and take parts of the old testament as gospel truth, then it is good and moral to get rid of the gays by any means necessary. Not only are we breaking God's commandments, but the acceptance of our existence makes it so that any children they have who might have bisexual or gay tendencies are likely to end up suffering in hell for all eternity. It's similar to how if you honestly believe in children being ensouled at the moment of conception, then abortion is literally murder. It's the people who simultaneously believe in souls and are pro abortion that have the fucked up inconsistent morality, not the fundamentalists.

Degeneracy/weakening of social structure/destruction of the traditional family unit: Many people believe that fags are simultaneously a cause and consequence of weakening family units. There isn't much question that community ties and family bonds are at an all time low in the present day. 100 years ago you would have known all the people in your community, gone to church with them, mourned with them, laughed with them and suffered as one. In the modern age, people frequently leave home at 18 and call their parents once a week or less, stuff them in a home when they get old and move around so much that we never even bither to learn the names of the people living on the same floor of our tiny apartments.

Fags tend to be even more estranged from their birth communities and parents and can reasonably be viewed as accelerating this kind of collapse.

Bunch of other reasons too, but I'm getting tired typing on a phone.

so if people from this im thinking that if we focus more on acceptance of other peoples lifes and how they choose to live them not only on a family level but on a societal level then families and community's would be more likely to stick together instead of fighting and leaving each other

im not talking about just gay people btw im talking about religion gays trans people basically everyone should look at the people they hate and question why they actually hate them and see if its a problem within themselves

>Why do conservatives think Jewish people are a threat
>Why do conservatives think black people are a threat
>

Good luck with that. Economy is too shit for that to work and people are too connected outside of physical interaction to foster community attachments. Plus we have all the cheap entertainment and porn making much of the motivation for those overarching structure superficially superfluous.

Ok, but like, outsiders ARE a threat to tradition.

there is no real threat to tradition traditions change and evolve over time if anything at all the true threat to tradition is time and no one no matter how hard they try can reverse time

>'moss come quick, your house is on fire'
>there is no real threat to my house
>buildings suffer wear and tear over time
>time is the real threat, nobody can reverse time, there's no point getting a fire hose

fags are hated and even executed in atheist countries also

>Why do strawmen think this statement I claim they think???

Attached: 1654790772930.jpg (625x626, 32.92K)

i dont understand your analogy explain it in a way that isnt trying to be a stupid joke

the BIBLE

Probably because we are degenerate, tradition destroying, traditionally pedophilic, disease bearing plague rats.

Also have you stopped to think about just how disgusting anal sex would have been before the advent of douches and showers? Like holy fuck.

i thought it was pretty clear, but the point is that gradual change in light of internal societal developments is radically different to rapid change forcibly enacted by external influences, with the latter being far more undesirable in most if not all cases

nobody wants their kid to be a fag and they believe it's a social contagion

you can say the same about cis man on woman sex you can say the same about eating everything everyone does on a daily is disgusting so then lets just destroy all life and take ourselves out in the process

so what exactly are these external forces gay people? Jewish people? literally anything other then this American idea of what a family is supposed to be that developed within the last 100 years

Disgusting and aberration is defined in part by deviation from the norm. Plus you know, when a dude 400 years ago fucked his wife he didn't leave shit all over the bed and mashed into his junk.

We just don't want gays to rape our kids, that's all. When gay rights were shilled as "it's just two people doing something in private" mostly everyone agreed with it, but in the last few years faggots have lost all their shame and flaunt their kinks in front of everyone, including kids. Before you say "B-BUT WHAT ABOUT STRAIGHT HYPERSEXUALIZATION?", that's a problem too.

fags probably didn't do much anal back then, mostly blowjobs

Rapid change is happening. That change is making communities uniformly worse while wages stagnate and decrease and the standard of living falls. We are a major part of that rapid change and get associated with it and frequently profess that all of the change is desirable and good.

gay people aren't external, that's the thing. other groups, though, very much can constitute external forces. i can't comment on american ideas specifically given that i'm not american, but families aren't exactly a new idea, i don't know what you're implying there.