Why are there not as many Trans Libertarians?

It makes no sense to me. Trans people would suffer under all the socialist ideas they claim to identify with.

Attached: '.png (951x951, 410.04K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ZITP93pqtdQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

But I am one!

Spread the word my friend.

Libertarianism is malebrained and they want to pass.

Im a social democrat. It’s the best ideology for trannies really

Lolbertarianism leads to communism invariably because of how easy it is for jews to infiltrate and subvert the society. The united states proved this. That's the closest thing to a libertarian society we've ever seen.

because in the united states most people who identify as "libertarians" are just right wing corporate cock suckers.

t.libleft

I can respect socdems. Only problem is Tranners get put on a wait list for their "free" healthcare 90% of the time.

It's based for women to own guns.

Why are you leftists? You know you're just the useful idiots right? They don't actually care about you. Le free hormones by the way kek. I would rather pay 1k/yr or less for hormones and not have to deal with all the paperwork and red tape of getting a diagnosis and subsequent prescription then getting through the waitlist.

Is hating jews malebrained or femalebrained

I ain't a leftist at all. Socdems are just not as bad as commies. But yes, I agree with you fully.

There are only two trans-inclusive governmental frameworks; Tranarchy and Trans Monarchy
>Tranarchy for all the DIYers and anti-medicalists
>Trans Monarchy for all the HPD Princes and Princesses who actually want to participate in society, but above cissoids

Also to answer your question, American lobert ideology is literally just "lol trust corporations to not act in a self-destructive, exploitative manner." All of the true freedom fighters or revolutionaries either joined the neo-KKK (Proud boys, etc) or literal anarchist gangs (Hells' Angels, etc)

Attached: 5pg2nw02ccf21.jpg (2000x1200, 54.32K)

Because socialist policies are what allow transpeople to exist regardless of the economic status they're born into. In a true libertarian society only the wealthy would even be able to entertain the idea of transitioning because the financial support structure necessary to go through all the steps simply wouldn't be available. Besides, the US is a case study of what happens when you let pharmaceutical companies go unregulated with their pricing, making transitioning not only harder but gating effective treatment and letting the poor pay for suboptimal medication.

It's malebrained

because rightoids are literally trying to legislate us out of existence as we speak?

you're either totally retarded and naive or you're retarded and think they'll accept you as "one of the good ones"

iphone venezuela 100 billion dead. Cope that human nature makes leftist ideas impossible.

So you'd rather get killed by democrats than get killed by republicans ig. Your explanation is a reason to look for an alt. Like libertarianism.

democrats are fucking shit but they arent actively trying to get rid of us atm

The whole muh waitlist thing is a dumb talking point. All the gate keeping in public healthcare is due to transphobia and deliberately underfunding it. Public healthcare in other areas can actually be pretty speedy and efficient

If you were a libertarian you could get hormones for 1k/yr or less and wouldn't have a min age attached to the diagnosis. Just sayin.

wanna get married

Karl Marx caused the Holodomor by personally eating all the bread in Ukraine

The way to combat transphobia is for Trans people to also open carry.

Political splitting is so fucking toxic holy shit shut the fuck up
It's almost like you can support deregulating/descheduling prescription drugs without having to form an entire government on "I don't like talking to doctors >:("

Based book-reader

So then giving centralized control to transphobes in big pharma is still a good idea or what?

Ok JrEg watcher.

>its almost as if
go back
The whole gov doesn't have to be on that. It's just that you don't have to the lesser of 2 evils. The only reason libertarians have never won is because of people who think that way. If lgbt would take a stand against democrats and band together a lot of cishet people would probably support it too.

Reject the system.

Attached: 72c7db0c4a61221e490dd50ea557767d.jpg (564x564, 40.51K)

That's why having a hybrid public/private system like Australia is based. Let the people who can afford it pay for private care to reduce strain on the public system.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZITP93pqtdQ

straight up libertarian seems like a bad move to me if you're not particularly wealthy

I believe in a socially backed free market capitalist democracy because I believe in the power and right to human greed as much as I do in humanitarian rights and I am a special snowflake fencesitter who thinks no single approach has it right so we need a third (or however many iterations up) way

because i don't understand politics and i refuse to. is a libertarian different from a left wing progressive? isn't all just chasing freedoms?

>le garry johnson bideo
Nobody actually likes Garry Johnson. Neither Jo Jorgenson. Just because they're the party's candidate doesn't mean we like them. It's more likely big players in the gop and dnc that are planting such shit nominees in the libertarian party.

I've never seen a libertarian, young at least, who doesn't have rich parents or isn't some autistic programmer

Better get grilling.

I very much agree

Maybe if your had some concept of nuance you'd realize that there are sub-factions in each party, but the GOP got fucked in the ass ever since a black man became president.

because libertarianism is retarded. long live the people's republic of china, and may the soviet union rise again! and here's hoping for a workers' republic of north america, inshallah!

>Glorifies horrible dictatorships
You just want to suck dick for a living.

hating jews is malebrained, hating israel is fembrained