TERF cope reactions to Roe v Wade

>The TERF cope today is immense.
Loads of TERFs today are lashing out with absolute venom because of Roe v Wade being overturned, but they can't actually lash out at any of the people who ARE anti-abortion because they've spent the last 5 years allying with them and openly promoting them for their anti-trans campaigns. So instead they've spent yesterday and today dog-piling charities and politicians who have a log history of supporting safe and timely access to abortion, but are also pro trans.
You click on their profiles and they're just goring from thread to thread by people grieving and condemning the overturning of Roe to rage about pronouns and ask what a woman is.
Other TERFs have gone mask off and announce they're still happy to collaborate with the pro-life movement like Kathleen Stock and Julie Bindel did yesterday.
The rest are busy cop-posting trying to convince themselves that losing access to abortion was a worthwhile trade off to fight against the 'real threat to women' that is trans people maintaining their rights, seemingly in an effort to fight off the cognitive dissonance that comes from seeing the obvious result of their support for, promotion of and collaboration with with a movement that was explicitly aiming to ban abolition.

Attached: FWFiCzLWAAENgEc.jpg (828x536, 53.11K)

>and they're still using the suffragette flag

>The real reason women lost their right to abortion was because of troons and semantic word games

Attached: FWGIBBzWAAEQVyW.jpg (896x1174, 158.09K)

I wouldn't be surprised if most terfs were a divide and conquer psy op like every other "reasonable moderate" that tries to convince others their rights aren't worth fighting for

Attached: 1635793936827.jpg (760x1200, 143.19K)

>Claim to be pro-choice
>Pro-choice politician posts about women losing their ability to choose
>Get mad at them for it because they're not transphobic enough
>Actually the law giving women the ability to chose was bad anyway nd the real problem is your inability to define woman

Attached: FWFrhCdX0AA7YJH.jpg (1242x1232, 188.15K)

>There are good people on both sides, I just want to have ~open dialogue~ whilst I continue to collaborate with the people who just stripped women of their rights, y'know, to defend women's rights.

Attached: good people on both sides.png (562x302, 44.12K)

No it totally is, that guy from Charlottesville published a newsletter about how to radicalize terf groups without them noticing.

Feminists/TERFs truly earned this.

Now let's see if they want to earn our support or are still happy oppressing us.

Post some usernames if you have them, TERF tears are my lifefuel

imagine thinking terfs need radicalization

>Feminists/TERFs
nothing wrong with feminists you rapehon

They would rather let women lose all their rights than admit they've been duped or work alongside trans people. It looks like they might get their wish. But feminist's as a whole is largely trans inclusive


TERFs as we know them today -do not- need to be further radicalized because they're so extreme, but it's worth remembering they're only so rabid now specifically because we're seeing the result of 5+ years of active radicalization and pipe line work. You look at the TERF movement in 2015 and it was nothing like this, there were a few extreme people out there but they were largely shunned by the majority of transphobes because their opposition to trans people was born out of 70's feminist's rhetoric, which viewed all men as patriarchy and therefore grouped trans people as part of that. Back then if you posted things that are now considered acceptable and mainstream TERF positions, like their conspiracy theories or their want to remove basically all rights, legal recognition and healthcare trans people have, you would get kicked out and banned for being an extremist. That's not to excuse 2015 terfs, they still sucked and were promoting transphobia, but it's important to realize that they're only so vile and extreme now thanks to being radicalized. Pose Parker and Graham Lie-ham were ostracized for being too extreme and cruel, now they're mainstream voices leading the anti-trans movement (more so PP these days). Even transphobe thought leaders that previously condemned PP for being an overt white nationalist and islamophobia with overtly genocidal rhetoric about trans people are now sucking back up to her as she becomes the face of the movement. Kathleen Stock made her support for PP overt this week after years of pointing out how awful she is because Stock has become more extreme herself and she also sees which way the wind is blowing and that the future of the Gender Critical movement is overtly far right in nature.

Daily reminder that overturning Roe doesn't make abortion illegal. It just means states can pass their own laws on the matter. Outside of the Bible Belt, nothing is going to change.

Just find that tweet by Stella Creasy and you'll find 500+ accounts all doing this same shit. They're having a meltdown and have no one to lash out with because they've been supporting all the people who actually wanted to ban abortion

>Other than all of the states about to make abortion illegal and all the other things the Supreme Court is going tp push through, nothing is going to change
ok user

for how cringey and hypocritical christfags are, it was funny seeing them dab on women and redditors

TERF simp.

Feminist arent terfs

Daily reminder, slavery is now a state issue, this just means confederate states will allow slaves but nothing is going to change

The worst part about all of this is that no matter how much these people keep showing how little they care about women at all (your first clue was the fact that their whole movement is based on hating trans WOMEN), you lot will keep falling for the stupid ter"""f""" moniker and you will unironically keep believing they are actual feminists.

>their opposition to trans people was born out of 70's feminist's rhetoric
Which is why the RF in "TERF" stands for radical feminist.

If TERFs were every "moderate" (or pretending to be) it was a deviation before they reverted to type. A brief spell before newcomers to the ideology absorbed it fully.

There was never a real ideological divide within the TERF movement, only differing opinions about how mask-off they could get away with being.

Religious transphobia is what's really being radicalized if anything is, by adopting TERF concepts and rhetoric.

As a feminist, I hate TERFs so much. What the hell are they even thinking? Surely a person over 18 and capable of using social media can't be this terminally stupid?

>Outside of the Bible Belt, nothing is going to change.

Attached: 8C08DCF7-73A4-4452-9865-1BA3A3373950.jpg (1125x890, 400.67K)

Daily reminder that killing babies isn't the same as owning human beings.

Useful idiots are useful because they’re idiots

>As a feminist, I hate TERFs
non sequitur

i'm happy about it. women fighting trannies and both losing their rights over it is just too good to be true. bye bye abortion rights!

That's basically the Bible Belt. And what is the definition of "ban" here? Does it necessarily mean a total ban on all abortions under or circumstances, or can it also mean tighter restrictions? Because they're not the same thing.

How the fuck is Florida "uncertain"??

you get what you deserve calling yourself a "feminist" lmao. you call yourself the thing and think you're different, incredible how much brain damage you have.
>b-but those arent real feminists only people who agree with me are real feminists!
call yourself something else or police the label otherwise you deserve everything you get.

They already have tight restrictions, user. We're speaking about a full on ban. In some cases without even a rape or incest clause.

Women always feel the need to announce that they're women, it's pretty common and part of their inferiority complex.

How can you police a label? Anyone can call themselves whatever they want and there's nothing anybody else can really do about it

Then move to another state if killing babies is so important for you

I always forget that Ohio is still a pretty red state
In Arkansas, for instance, it's a complete ban unless to save the mother's life. No exceptions for rape or incest

>In some cases without even a rape or incest clause.
Should the penalty for murdering a post-birth person be less if they were conceived through rape or incest?

More than 100 million people live in the states that will ban it, retard

How about you make your own country where you can ban abortions and everyone who agrees just moves there with you? Preferably in the middle of the ocean

Oh I get it, so the world swimming federation's making transwomen competing illegal doesn't affect all transwomen?
kys
no srsly kys

The vast majority of modern feminist is trans inclusive and was so even in the 70's. Most 'TERFs' are not feminists in any meaningful way, hence why they don't care about the attacks on bodily autonomy and the rise of theocratic fascism and why they're happy to ally with the people bringing it to the forefront. They're 'feminists' in name only, and that was only for optics and to allow them to launder their talking points into spaces that would otherwise have outright rejected their message, now that the GC movement is becoming increasingly infiltrated and supported by the far right, lots of them are abandoning the guise of being feminists all together, hence the shift to "gender critical", which means they didn't have to keep up the act of being feminists and now to "sex realists" which negates the need to pretend they're at all critical of gender roles.

You've fallen for TERF propaganda and rhetoric. They're not feminists and never were. Feminists largely reject them, it's just themselves and the media that are eager to present them as "feminists". Their thought leaders like Posie Parker outright reject the label and call themselves "female-ists" because they openly oppose feminist ideas

Non sequitur, fetuses aren't people

It's a matter of principle.

>words have meaning
>someone shouts loud that they don't
>words have no meaning anymore
This is your brain in America

It's a yes or no question.

>t. future rapist

Trannies hate women's rights tho

why would they do that?

I won't answer because it's a distraction that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Go troll somewhere else

what meaning does any word have that proves you right?

You have no reason to refuse an answer unless you know that answer will discredit you. The fact you think it will tells us all what your answer is.