What are LGBT's thoughts on this man?

What are LGBT's thoughts on this man?

Attached: 12345.png (795x446, 483.07K)

Ah yes, John Money, inventor of money and all other currency.
Kind of shocking that humanity didn't come up with that kind of shit before him imo, but a great man none the less

Ironic that his work actually contradicted his own theory that gender is purely socialization and thus proving that gender is innate, which ultimately proves the validity of trans people.

The irony part being that Any Forums is somehow so illiterate as to interpret an innate sense of gender as proof against an innate sense of gender, but my sentence was getting too long and as i mentioned, illiteracy is a widespread issue with this topic

pretty horrendous experiment, as most social scientists do.
At least he proved gender is more than just socialisation and that people create themselves to some extent instead of just being purely conditioned by skinner boxes.
I dislike psychologists and the field so fucking much holy shit bros.

I remember watching a documentary in Philsophy class about this dude, I was in the middle in the front row and also came out like a year before.

Why don't you search the archives before asking questions, you leaded fuel brain damaged redditor

It's amazing how his insanely inhuman experiments had the exact opposite results he wanted, and those results actually show conclusive proof that trans people are born innately. And it's equally amazing that conservative retards use his experiments to justify their transphobia because they don't even bother to actually look into them at all.

The what?

The only people who agree with him are the extreme left (gender social construct dur dur) or extreme right (there is no chance in a million someone could be born with a desire to be the opposite sex). Literally everyone else see his results and conclude that a) there is a biological part of gender, b) people can be born in the deviation of the norm (rare but it trannies are evidence) and c) gender cant be corrected by society (this should be obvious because trannies already exist and back then society didnt allowed their expression).

the very simple truth about sex and gender which is based directly off of sex is that everyone has two parents' right? well those two parents must be a male and a female or else no one would exist. a sperm and an egg is needed in order for a birth to occur. a sperm naturally comes from a man. an egg naturally comes from a woman. so there are two different things needed for a human to exist. there is no nonbinary or third sex or anything because again, everyone has two parents, one male and one female. that's literally it. any nonbinary or transgender or anything idea requires insane amounts of mental gymnastics to justify, it just flat out doesn't make sense. and yes third grade biology is really all you need for this topic, I just explained it in about a minute. You're welcome.

pills

Back up lol no Im a far leftist and gender is a social construct; john money is a fucking crank. Hes not our guy.

The only people who defend his idea of people having no innate sense of gender identity are the right wing gender essentialist types.

its always funny when conservatives bring him up as an argument against trans people existing

he's Jewish and the Jewish tend to have a very strong love of the homosexual community. as an example, the largest pride parade on the planet happens in Tel Aviv, the most LGBT friendly country in the middle east and possibly in the world.

Why do leftists assume we want to cherrypick evidence to oppress trans when really all we want to do is cheat on our ciswives with your boimouths?

like they think we think what this guy did is really poggers or something

but does his research prove that this innate sense of gender can be cross-sex? you don't just need to prove that gender is innate for trans people, you also have to prove that males can innately feel like women

>he's Jewish
Not even lol, he's an anglosaxon anglican from new zealand
Milton Diamond on the other hand...

Shoutout john money really funny name

He disproved gender theory and gender as a social construct, against his own wishes, by inducing bad enough gender dysphoria in a cis boy that he killed himself. Also he's a gay pedophile.

are you that twittard pariahthedoll?

>but does his research prove that this innate sense of gender can be cross-sex? you don't just need to prove that gender is innate for trans people, you also have to prove that males can innately feel like women
No but that's unnecessary. If gender identity is learned then transness cannot exist and must be caused by some psychological problem during development.
If gender identity is innate and cannot be changed through nurture than all gender identities are innate, including cross-sex ones.
Otherwise you'd be arguing that gender identity is innate, except for people with cross sex gender identity, but you have no explanation then for what causes the difference in cross-sex gender identity.
A much more parsimonious explanation is that gender identity is innate and cross-sex gi is caused by a form of intersex that involves the brain.
You don't have solid proof that c-s gi is innate, but you can explain it using two things that you know are true, and it not only fits in but also confirms them.
Arguing that gi is innate but c-s needs rigorous proof because you are introducing another element with no explanation and that in fact directly contradicts what you already know.

no, he had lots of feminist fans when he was popular because they wanted to prove all gender was fake to help combat sexism

Even if i accept that (i dont, that sounds spurious "lots of feminists" lol) that doesnt make his ideas germaine to contemporary leftists and critics of gender essentialism

Especially given that his ideas are the basis of gender essentialism and completely at odds with the idea that people have a deeper sense of self identity that is the wellspring of socialized gender presentation