why do wokeshits type like this
Why do wokeshits type like this
cishet agp men who wear diapies are also lgbt
only if they’re on hrt
It's like typing retardedly as possible makes you sound more oppressed and the argument irrelevant
theater kid syndrome. it's contagious my friends were all theater kids in hs and i used to type like a fucking idiot too
Do she wants to be gay but she hates gay ppl
Being under the age of 18 and overexposure to the internet
I don't get why so many people have an issue with the ace thing. Things are no doubt difficult for genuine ace people. Sex is a big part of any relationship so having an aversion to it would make any prospect match difficult, no? I can see why they would want it to be understood or known, and I can't imagine who or what is harmed by them being included in lgbt. If the argument is people playing at being ace for attention/pity or w/e, people do the same with the other letters too.
I don’t wear diapers but am a part of the community anyways, because I come to shitpost on this board :^)
They don't have to be part of an already existing community in order to make their situation known. The lgbt community isn't 'anything that isn't cis straight'. This sounds like a shitty argument from zoophiles. They can just build their own community (or go tojail in the zoo case)
You bringing fetishes into the argument is just disingenuous. What is the argument against them being part of the lgbt community? They struggle with sexuality in their relationships, or the way their sexuality is percieved, just as anyone else under lgbt does. You comparing them to zoophiles is proof of that.
>le community
what is the argument for them being part of the lgbt community instead of their own fucking community. they have nothing in common with us and are frequently triggered and bitchy and whiny in lgbt spaces, silencing anyone who wants to talk about sex or relationships because it excludes them. they don't fit in. it's an actively counterproductive grouping
>what is the argument
I just posted it. Their struggle with romance/sexuality and how it is perceived by others. Same reason lgbt exists for anyone else.
>frequently triggered and bitchy and whiny
You can say that about any of us / any letter, it's more about the space than it is about their identity. Just like you'll find more bitching and bad takes on twitter than most anywhere else. Your argument is the same people will use against trannies or bi's, and it's nonsense.
IMO Asexualism shouldn't be included in LGBTQ+ because it is some kind of disorder.
Sexuality is a normal part of human psychology that's borderline necessary to be happy.
I would also say differentiation between sexuality and romanticism (Asexual vs. Aromantic) is cringe. Preferring sex but not romance and vice-versa are literally not orientations, they're preferences. These are the same as sapiosexual/demi-sexual, both of which aren't real sexualities. They literally exist so white girls can be LGBTQ+.
based
i want to be a nice person but the other user just makes more sense to me…the lgbt community literally came about due to the shared oppression faced by people who did gay shit and people who did tranny shit, and who occupied similar marginalized spaces as a result of that oppression. i’m sure that cis aro/ace people face problems in their relationships but i don’t know what i broadly have in common with them as a trans lesbian.
The fuck is that language? Is that newspeak?
Ashton is right tho
Gays and lesbians have the used "I don't see what we have in common", "What does gender have to do with sexuality" type arguments against us tho, I don't see how it's different for us to use it against asexual people. And if so, does that make their argument valid? More importantly I just don't see the harm it does to have them included. Just feels like petty bias to exclude.
._. creo q cada neurona la perdí leyendo todo esto