Sigh, was this really necessary?
Sigh, was this really necessary?
Connor Young
Other urls found in this thread:
individual.utoronto.ca
twitter.com
Anthony Perry
yes.
Dominic Carter
the teleological purpose hsts is to bimbomode and degrade themselves in the prism of supposed patriarchy and misogynist diatribes as a deconstruction of themselves from a noumenical homonuculus tabula rasa into an object of sordid Eros
Jacob Brown
did not like this album one bit! but just as every female pop star seems to be forced to do, she went from making fun cute creative music to the prostitute aesthetic. kim will always have a special place in my heart but the disappointment from seeing her do this is unreal
Julian Murphy
hell yeah bro!
Connor Moore
undeniably based
Xavier Lee
Nah pretty sure that's AGP
Jeremiah Harris
incredibly based
Luis Morales
AGP are self centred coomers, they are like a closed circuit, HSTS apotheosis is a holistic attack on the world itself, thats why they drop albums screaming about sucking cock and AGP run around hiding & jerk off wearing lingerie at home
Samuel Cruz
it's proof that being a meta-attracted twinkhon is a genetic disorder that isn't solved by transitioning early
Logan Robinson
That's agp
HSTS just want to fuck straight men, they don't need any validation besides that
Caleb Mitchell
"HSTS" that about sucking dick like that are almost always actually male-brained meta-attracted AGPs who like how being a "slut" makes them feel like a real girl
Owen Kelly
Lmao what a retard.
Ayden Stewart
blanchard literally said the one thing that distinguishes hsts from metaattracted agps is their fixation on dicks
individual.utoronto.ca
>In my opinion, bisexual gender dysphoric's erotic interest in males is qualitatively different from that experienced by homosexual gender dysphorics. In their fantasies of sexual interaction with men, bisexual gender dysphorics are primarily aroused by what is, for them, the symbolic meaning of such acts, namely, the thought that they themselves are women. This type of "bisexual" orientation need not reflect an equal erotic attraction to the male and female physiques and would perhaps better characterized as "pseudobisexuality".
>It should be noted that homosexual gender dysphorics also have erotic fantasies, and that their fantasies also include cross-gender content. The occurrence of such fantasy should not, however, obscure the essential difference between pseudobisexual and true homosexual attraction. Homosexual gender dysphorics are directly aroused by the objective features of the male physique, especially the sight and feel of the male genitalia, and this arousal is not dependent on the mediation of cross-gender fantasies.
>Bisexual gender dysphorics differ greatly in the extent to which their erotic interest in males supplants their sexual attraction for females. They also differ in the extent to which they merely fantasize intercourse with men or act this out in reality. Finally, those who do act out their fantasies, which preferentially involve heterosexual men, find different ways of which to accomplish this.
Ayden Ortiz
Is this the power of HSTS?
Carter Reed
Except he never said it was the sole difference. Not even in what you posted. He had an entire criteria list for before, including the age of onset.
Josiah Davis
>muh porn is feminist libarayshun.
Justin Reyes
it's more like an extended critique of the gaze itself
Wyatt Gray
Sweet heavens PhilosophyAnon, you've convinced me. You are indeed worthy of being deemed as Based.
Owen Kelly
>>it's more like an extended critique of the gaze itself
that's what porn positive "feminists" say, yes indeed.
Adrian Thompson
In a way, HSTS are the ultimate misogynists, they are an altar of submission to misogyny
males that covet misogyny beyond simply profiting from it 'en passant' but submit to it willingly.
they are the house niggers of the patriarchy, except it's like a white man enslaving himself in the masters house, and loving every second