lets say there is a thing that can turn you into a cis girl but you lose ALL sexuality or sexual feelings and make you mentally and emotionally around 7 or 8 FOREVER. you would never be able to have a boyfriend and you would never be able to love anyone- EVER. would it be worth it to do this to become a cis girl?
Would you give up your sexuality and ability to love to become a cis girl?
Josiah Stewart
Other urls found in this thread:
Aaron Nguyen
no
Jordan Martinez
No i like guys too much
Adrian King
>mentally and emotionally around 7 or 8 forever
shoo autopedophilic retard
Logan Fisher
id do it
Kayden Morales
No you dont. Youre just meta attracted.
Josiah Hughes
Whats that mean?
Chase King
nope! physically you are the same age just as a cis girl. i just said that to show that you would not be able to have any sexual feelings at all
James Rivera
You are not in to men. You are in to the idea of men. Most likley comphet.
Jack Butler
no? being a cisgirl isnt THAT special
Oliver Howard
uh it is to trans girls
Kevin Parker
>make you mentally and emotionally around 7 or 8 FOREVER
i have bpd so only the mental part of this would be new lel
Mason Martin
maybe to agpedos lol. i can still be kind-of a woman in this life, with a functioning brain and a boyfriend who i love and will marry soon.
Wyatt Collins
So if i like girls is that meta attraction too?
Gabriel Parker
Bisexual and asexual trans women are not real. You just want to geel valid and less creepy.
Dominic Evans
more proof that blanchard is a bullshit quak
Robert Cooper
There is no such thing as an androphilic trans woman. It is all comphet and shame.
Jason White
i wont trade love for anything
Jacob Scott
Yes the happiest time of my life was when I was around that age, being a girl on top of it would seal the deal. Discovering what sex is and that men and women are different is the worst thing that ever happened to me anyway.
Michael Fisher
I'd strongly consider doing this
Hunter Murphy
>kind-of a woman
How do you tolerate being kind of something instead of being the thing in itself?