I’ve made it

Why don’t you join us, user?

Attached: E17D5CD2-77F7-4E6A-93F5-DFD447B8D029.jpg (1242x1793, 413.45K)

are you saying those things just cause you're thristy for validation?

>matriarchal society
imagine putting people who cannot even open a jar in charge of anything

enjoy simping for people who see you as a pet

makes more sense then putting people who use strong bodys to hurt other people in charge

like literally if girls and women ruled the world it would be so much better like most wars and crime and most bigotry comes from men also women have better emotional understanding then men so literally the only reason men are in charge is because how strong they are with muscles

Do you realize the reason matriarchal societies dont exist is because they all got rekt?

a matriarchal society would unironically be way better than the current one

this. don't go down this road user.

yes BY men. men are physicaly stronger thats the only reason they rule but it makes more sense for women to be the rulers

True but things come in cycles. Could personally easily see something like this happen again. I’m personally happy with it

Attached: C94FF299-E871-4EB4-BB96-B436666A7C72.jpg (960x720, 66.64K)

Women start wars more often than men, they sacrifice lives readily because they know it'll never be their own on the line, they don't know what it's like to fight so they send others to do it without fear.

the longest raining ruler in the world is literally a woman- QUEEN elizabeth and what about queen victoria? think how sucessful the victorian age and queen elizabeth are next to the male rulers like who even remembers them? richard the whatever henry the whatever who even cares they didnt do anything it was women who rule and still do

Maybe the gender that keeps getting rekt is just unfit to rule.

Would agree that war wouldn’t stop, it’s deeply rooted into us as humans. If want to remove war then the species would need to go

Plus it would still act as outlet for men who very obviously need that sort of thing in their lives

what are you talking about??? most women dont start wars because wars are a construct of masculinty only

>matriarchy would be more peaceful that current world
>actually, we already had female rulers and they were way more brutal

Maybe there is some merit to this matriarchy thing

>What is the White Feather Brigade

there will still be wars but it will be social wars and popularity or reputations not nuclear weapons or guns or battle plane seige command lets blow em up men or whatever. a women war would be more deadly because it would ruin the lives of the actual people not just the countrys
maybe the gender that keeps reking others isnt fit to rule? more power wont make men better rulers

cmon dont go out like that. shits pathetic

no it's been proven by history multiple times. Women always destroy shit.

Attached: 1600356646750.jpg (590x824, 238.06K)

i totally agree with this, great stability and longevity. Both of these were rulers under two separate golden ages for England/UK, for different reasons. Good example of could be achieved

>Queer Elizabeth and Queer Victoria
Literal figureheads who never did anything but plant trees and pretend to be important (Like all women)

Attached: 1628864437165.jpg (864x545, 87.28K)

State enforced androgyny is the only way - fuck the patriachy and especially fuck the matriarchy

Yeah, correlation's causation

Would you rather rekt or be rekt?
The rekters write history, the rekt are forgotten