As technological progress increases, sexual dimorphism decreases due to technologicies encroaching and subsuming physical responsibilities
The human species has been selecting for neoteny for over thousands and thousands years, it is quite evident when you compare modern day skulls to ones of the past
The future of the human race will be one of sexually monomorphic hyper neotenous femboys growing babies in pods, and I'm tired of pretending it is not.
Masculinity is a scourge, but it is comforting that it's destruction is inevitable barring some sort of permanent societal collapse or technological stalling
The Inevitable Collapse of Masculinity
Logan King
Other urls found in this thread:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
twitter.com
Wyatt Taylor
Men will soon only exist for our pleasure ;)
Alexander Hall
The year is 2070, the most masculine "men" are women who have been injecting testosterone since 14
Luis Watson
One more thing to remember:
There is more than enough sperm frozen to impregnate any woman who wants it for millions of years. If all cis men suddenly disappeared, died, or became chemically castrated to be femboys and trannies human civilization would just keep on chugging along like normal.
Wyatt Wright
sounds based to me
Bentley Morris
it's a cool thought and I agree with a lot of what you said, but female/gay male sexual desire continues to make masculine people necessary. Also, you're not considering cognitive dimorphism, which is what gives rise to physical dimorphism. That will continue to exist. So pretty much everything is correct but this
>sexually monomorphic hyper neotenous femboys
Wyatt Butler
isn't it funny how masculinity is literally just a vestigal parasite that will continue on solely due to its sexual use case? Any decent society will gene edit the populace to remove androphilic attraction in the far future
Robert Cox
>There is more than enough sperm frozen to impregnate any woman who wants it for millions of years. If all cis men suddenly disappeared, died, or became chemically castrated to be femboys and trannies human civilization would just keep on chugging along like normal.
but then it costs $10k to have a baby. at least in the short term, that would mean only rich people could have kids
and keep in mind that about 10 million sperm are recommended for one IVF
>At least 10 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml, of which at least 30% are motile and 15% have progressive motility, are required for IVF or insemination therapy, despite the fact that pregnancies can be achieved with lower parameters.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
John Martin
especially since men are what threaten regimes, a fembrained populace would be ideal for an authoritarian state
Logan Ross
>isn't it funny how masculinity is literally just a vestigal parasite that will continue on solely due to its sexual use case?
the same could be said about femininity. the existence of male/female sex is to perform sexual reproduction