What is Any Forums's stance on IRL statements (say in an interview or on social media) by anime/manga creators that...

What is Any Forums's stance on IRL statements (say in an interview or on social media) by anime/manga creators that modify or add onto the actual content of their work? Shouldn't a work stand on its own without the canon being revised by external statements made after the fact, like saying years later that X character was gay or trying to explain away a plot hole?

Attached: 1611596642627.jpg (727x715, 86.12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=eSn_pI5idr8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Sometimes they are necessary

Attached: complete kirino ending.png (1851x204, 20.39K)

Don't care. I interpret their work, not what their intentions were.

I don't even read that kind of stuff, so it doesn't matter.

Clarifications are good, retcons are bad.

It´s a case by case thing.

Examples?

Attached: TdEB2.png (607x482, 378.17K)

99% of the time it doesn't matter because it's not like whatever they say can be retroactively inserted into the work, on the other hand if it's just something small like answering what was x character doing off screen during this arc and it doesn't seem implausible it can add a bit of flavor to a series

What are you trying to refer to, OP?

Depends. It can add some interesting things to think about but on the whole its seperate, especially if its said years later or contradicts what was already said.

When I was in school I was taught that an author doesn't necessarily know their work best. Once something leaves an author's hands and enters the public domain, it's fair game for any interpretation. I think that's pretty agreeable. Just because Anno says "it's just to look cool" doesn't mean you shouldn't ignore the religious symbology in Eva

Art is up to the reader to interpret. No one cares about what the artist has to say.

Was the carnival scene at the end of Monkey Island 2 real or a hallucination induced by LeChuck?
Address both of Elaine's statements about Guybrush's disappearance, his relationship with his parents, and that the next game begins with him floating in a bumper car.

like all things in life it should be approached on a case by case basis and without taking yourself too seriously

True, you first see their statement that "it's just to look cool". Then you watch the show and realize that, yes, it's there to look cool and fans are fucking theoryfags schizos. Only after assessing their word and the work itself you should come to your own conclusion.

youtube.com/watch?v=eSn_pI5idr8

While I agree I'd add that it depends on context. Art is relational and people will get different meanings from something. Sometimes that meaning can be something that grows beyond the author's intent. But viewers don't know best either. In the worst case that thinking leads to fans who think they should dictate how some story should go.

Yeah absolutely, it's fair game for any interpretation but not every interpretation is a good one. It's extremely common to project one's own ideology onto a work without there being much of a basis, for example.

A work stands on its own. Once an author has put his pen down, his opinion is just another opinion.

This makes sense in a vacuum, but look at any argument about interpretations. No one says “this is what I think” they say “this is what the author meant” Because everyone is aware of how little weight their own words carry, they try to align the author’s words to their own.
So yes, author statements do matter. Simply because the majority thinks that the author is the highest authority on the matter.

Yeah, they matter in the sense that they're influential, but not in the sense that they're the word of god speaking unassailable truth