Now that the dust has settled which one is the better of the 3 ?

bleach is the best written one and most mature and most creative and has best written villains and overall is the better series.
naruto is for edgy angsty teenagers and wan piss is for literal kids and manchilds.

Naruto before timeskip has better characterization than One Piece has ever had. Including a decent story with a very compelling main character.

But it shits the bed after timeskip.
Overall, Naruto (at its best) > One Piece (at its best)

no they didn't.

naruto

Attached: 1642280167761.jpg (419x512, 38.77K)

yes they did

To begin with, calling manga that lasted as long as they are as having the decency to end is a fucking joke. Furthermore Boruto, Hell Arc and Burn the Witch exist. So no, no they did not.

Bleach had the best art, had Aizen and probably peaked the highest. One Piece was the most consistently good out of the three and probably had the best main cast.
Part 1 Naruto was good but Shippuden was dogshit.

Naurto and Bleach both focus on aesthetic for aesthetics sake. One piece's aesthetics are for artistic reasons. When you're yonger you'll think than One piece is hot shit and Bleach and Naruto are the best, When you grow up you realize how shallow they both are compared to an actual artistic work (one piece)

When it comes to the art, it's Bleach and it's not even a contest.
Naruto pre-shippuden was the best overall though. Too bad shippuden shitted itself near the end.
One piece was okayish on every level, but the art makes it unredeable, and wano was atrocious. It's very consistent though.

>compared to an actual autistic work (one piece)
FTFY

>When it comes to the art, it's Bleach and it's not even a contest.
Where are the backgrounds?

I'm going to go with One Piece since it's the only one I didn't drop

at start both naruto and bleach was cool
they had hard start and needed to learn lot of stuff to do something
then they added power level bullshit and killed it
didn't watched OP, dropped bleach mid bounto arch, and dropped og natuto when only fillers remained

Attached: 1572536581518.jpg (480x480, 51.83K)

One Piece "art" is dogshit. Main reason i could never get into it

>bleach is the best written one and most mature and most creative and has best written villains and overall is the better series.
This pic alone is the antithesis of everything you just said.

Attached: image-13.png (426x750, 134.87K)

>cartooning is bad because... it just is, okay?

Attached: snek.jpg (757x1100, 203.02K)

Cope all you want. One Piece is an eyesore.

Dust hasn't settled fren, One Piece is still ongoing.

>the art is bad because it's cartoony and cartoony = bad by definition, okay?

At least Oda can draw backgrounds. All Kubo knows to do is to play dress up with his characters.

focusing solely on aesthetics in what is a medium that is supposed to tell you a story was always a mistake. Naruto wasn't even conceived of as a ninja show.

>he new project was originally going to feature Naruto as a chef, but this version never made it to print. Kishimoto originally wanted to make Naruto a child who could transform into a fox, so he created a one-shot of Naruto for the summer 1997 issue of Akamaru Jump based on the idea. Despite the positive feedback it received in a readers' poll, Kishimoto was unhappy with the art and the story, so he rewrote it as a story about ninjas.

From the ground up, Kishi was led along by his aesthetic tastes, and not the desire to tell a artful adventure story. Art for aesthetics sake and not art for arts sake.

Do I really need to make my point for Bleach also? Everyone praises Bleach's aesthetics, it's as if he would have preferred to write a manga about fashion and not teens ripping into each other with katanas.

holy shit this is real? looks like a poorly fan-made doujin kek