He literally raped her.
He literally raped her
You can't rape property.
Branding someone as a slave does not strip them of their humanity. it was and always has been rape.
Where does this dumb saying come from? Pretty sure fucking your dog is against the animal law.
She's literally his slave.
Society recognizes her as property. She sold herself into slavery to pay off her debts. She has already relinquished her human rights, yet was fortunate enough to find a master who would treat her well.
he literally raped her the first night
Women owe me sex
Historically, rape was prosecuted as a property crime. Even if they weren't slaves, they were treated as the wards of their husbands/brothers/fathers as the case may be. The original latin term from which the contemporary word "rape" is derived simply means to take. You can see this meaning in play with the Rape of the Lock, where a man steals a lock of a woman's hair. Or how the Rape of the Sabine Women and the Rape of Persephone refers to their abduction, not to the sexual act to follow.
Zoophilia is more complex then that. Some jurisdictions flat out ban any form of zoophilia but others will only apply animal cruelty laws if the animal came to harm. Animals themselves will attempt copulation.
"rape" is a strange way of saying they made sweet passionate love
She sold herself into slavery and a big part of being a slave is consenting to sex with the master, ergo it's not rape, she just can't refuse to have sex with him because that would be withdrawing the consent she gave him when she became a slave.
Good.
Note that recognizing rape of a spouse is a fairly new idea and not universally implemented.
>No struggle
>Accepting my advances
You sure it was rape? This isn't a universe with mind manipulation shit like pic related, that's rape.
It's also a bad idea.
Raping your spouse or recognizing marital rape?
acceptance and rejection are one and the same, one is a future outcome of the other. ~master oogway
The legal concept of marital rape is a bad idea. If two people are in a relationship where such a thing can be earnestly considered, then they shouldn't have gotten married to begin with.
Oh yeah, the "but he treats them well" argument.
Why they never do anything to stop slavery so no slave will risk being treated poorly i wonder.
>She sold herself into slavery
No she didn't.
Subversion is cringe and low-test.
When in Rome do as the Romans.
Maybe because treating one person well and completely changing a world's standards are orders of magnitude apart in terms of difficulty.
>When in Rome do as the Romans.
Conformity is cringe and low-test.
not fucking your property is cringe and low-test
No, you onions'd up commie fuck
He won't even free one person. And don't start about Roxanne wanting to be slave, Michio could've easily persuaded her to accept freedom.
>in terms of difficulty
What difficulty?
Most of these Isekai faggots come to the world with all of the God's blessings, powers and cheat skills.
They could make the world their bitch in a week if they wanted to.
>Michio could've easily persuaded
For what purpose?
If she's going to continue to ride his dick in town and watch his back in the labyrinth, what does freeing her accomplish? A bureaucratic box getting checked off. If she's not going to perform the aforementioned tasks after being freed, then paying for her was a waste and he should have spent the money on a getting better equipment.