ITT: objectively shitty show that you loved

Unless the only thing you care about in an anime is that you can see characters, by that metric you are not measuring the quality of that anime.
Which is the topic of the discussion.

I never said objectivity doesn't exist in general.

I do realize that I was not a decent move on me to take the word "objectively" literally when it came up in the OP. I meant to poke a little fun at you, and the topic grew beyond what it deserved.
But when you just say that some things are poorly written, you are not really doing objective evaluation. What does "poorly written" even mean, objectively?
[no need to answer that, it's just further derailment without good cause]

You strike me as quite the intellectual indeed. Your emotion intelligence is also quite impressive to be a massive faggot and then place yourself in the roll as the bigger man.

Attached: genericglassespush.jpg (576x331, 57.03K)

>by that metric you are not measuring the quality of that anime
How so? That is just your personal opinion. I presented a basis for character quality which follows a simple rule: more screentime = more score. That is objectivity. I could even add other factors but that is irrelevant, the point here is objectivity exists as long as the basis is a unified immutable rule, which is the opposite of subjectiveness.

no

Re:Zero

Ginga Bishounen TAUBURN

Attached: SD.jpg (1280x720, 165.54K)

>How so?
You failed to read the first half of the sentence.

And you fail to grasp what I've been talking about for two consecutive posts now.

No, I get what you are talking about. You are right in that there can be objective measures of things in anime.
Unfortunately, you did not get what I said in either of my posts.

Easy for me

Attached: Another_series_cover.jpg (266x374, 21.39K)

No, I do get that you failed to understand my posts.
Once again, it does not matter whether my basis is an accurate representation of a show's quality, or even the characters. The point is it is objective. I made that example to show you that much yet instead of comprehending it you jump to the most obvious yet false conclusion of it being inaccurate. That's not my point.

funniest anime i've ever watched i fucking pissed myself

>it does not matter whether my basis is an accurate representation of a show's quality
But it does matter, because it's brought up against my statement that is limited to [the quality of entertainment media".
That's your first mistake. You just stopped reading and disagreed without understanding what you were disagreeing with.

You are simply too hasty for this conversation.

I'm not disagreeing with anything, you'd know that if you comprehended what I've been saying but I guess that's too much to ask.
There's obviously limits to the basis' you can come up with in this context. For example, you can't attribute how the population density of china to the libido level of the MC. That is absurd, although it objective as long as the rule is unified and immutable.

>I'm not disagreeing with anything,
Brought up as a point of disagreement. Cute irony.

Even if we accepted that was just meaningless meandering around the topic and you weren't trying to prove me wrong, your second mistake is in misreading my next post, where again I speak of the QUALITY OF THAT ANIME, and make an exception for "Unless the only thing you care about in an anime is that you can see characters".
Which you hilariously fail to read properly.
First by
>How so? That is just your personal opinion.
Showing that you didn't get the limitation of my statement in the first half of my post, and then by arguing that it's an objective measurement, demonstrating that you didn't realize that I said it's not an objective measurement of the "quality of that anime".

You suck at reading. It's just an established fact at this point.