What do you guys think about WSJ moving away from masculine manga and embracing more feminine stuff?

What do you guys think about WSJ moving away from masculine manga and embracing more feminine stuff?
Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss.

Attached: images (6).jpg (208x243, 12.93K)

It's a fucking disgrace.
Ruri and Akane are the worst fucking things to have happened to Jump in ages.

Kys.

Chainsaw man was the last good manga WSJ produced in over a decade.

shut the fuck up moeshitter.

Kill yourselves, redditors.

CSM is garbage

Agreed.
Back to your moeshit, troon.

WSJ hasn't been masculine in decades.

I wouldn't know, I don't read magazines for children.

>Akane
??? full name?

I really loved the one shot but I'm not sure about the series.

half-dragon sex!! making quadroons with ruri-chan!!

It's a good thing for them.

Shonenspics FEAR the ruridoragon

You obviously have never read Toriko

Akane is battleshonen, ruri is moeshit.

What's feminine about Ruri Dragon? Is having a female main character all it takes to call a manga feminine? Was Claymore feminine?

it has a lot of feminine themes mate

Such as?

Because clearly we need more shit like Doron and Ayashimom right?

I think you're a moron because romcoms and girl-oriented spokon have been a part of Jump for decades now. A Jump tranny romcom from 1981 basically codified the J-pop aesthetic and was targeted towards both sexes.

Jump was never entirely dudes punching dudes for dudes.