Rate the manga you've read just based on their art style/visual style

tiermaker.com/create/manga-tier-list-100-manga-6827

Attached: my-image.png (1140x807, 1.15M)

Didn't want to put all the jojo parts, but that's where the series in general would be and Junji Ito's works in general would be where Uzumaki is.

Attached: art.png (994x787, 896.03K)

>artstyle tier list
>Baki is in the list
oh boy here we go

>CSM has better art than berserk
Why is it that people on Any Forums feel the need to be as contrarian as they possibly can at all times?

It's called an opinion bud. For me, Berserk has solid art, but it's not unique, it doesn't have a distinct feel to it and doesn't do anything particularly better than Chainsaw Man's art other than raw detail. If I flip through a Chainsaw Man volume at random and pick a page I will get a better panel than doing the same with Berserk. Emotions, movement, paneling, pretty much everything except raw detail CSM does better. It looks like most people just care about how detailed a panel is.

Attached: csmber.png (1442x1172, 1.45M)

I only included part 1 of Jojo, but it counts as all the parts that i read (1-5)

OPM would be god tier visually if it's earlier stuff, brought it down to S due to the downgrade

Attached: download.png (1140x923, 1.58M)

>the likes of CSM and BC over Vagabond and Berserk
>One Piece on the same tier as Attack on Garbageart
>Tokyo Revengers over JJK

wow user, your opinion is so quirky and cool

>It's called an opinion
>lists stuff like they are facts
everytime

Attached: 1526623265239.jpg (640x480, 27.08K)

>a highly important scene in CSM that the mangaka clearly cared about putting a lot of detail into vs a throwaway page

i too can nitpick, retard

Attached: WhatsApp Image 2022-06-06 at 17.24.48.png (1457x724, 837.42K)

Subjectivity is implied when someone is talking about manga, anime, shows, books, music etc. No one has to say "in my opinion I think _______" every time they express their opinion. If you read the first two words after the first sentence maybe you'd understand the rest of the response is clearly an opinion.

Hmm, I will say that panel you chose for Berserk is pretty good, I'd also say the CSM panel on the left isn't even bad, it's quite good. Like I said though, flipping through a volume and picking at random, I'd find more panels in favor of CSM. If you like Berserk's artwork more than CSM go ahead, whatever. But panel for panel CSM has a way better ratio than Berserk, due to how long Berserk is. People will just pick out the same handful of panels forgetting the hundreds of pages that are just "there".

Objectively, the only correct opinion on this whole board. If you think anything in D or C should be higher, you're retarded.

Attached: Screenshot_118.png (1134x813, 1.29M)

Attached: ,hkgkhkg.png (865x512, 850.29K)

Attached: manga by visual style.png (1131x711, 1.06M)

i am less surprised than i expected that i'd have to make my own version of that to even begin to have enough to make a list out of.

>Black Shitter C
Kek

Attached: 1654531590791.png (1140x919, 1.28M)

It has good art even with a boring story.

>FMA that high
lmao its garbage
objective my ass

True but you can say the same from BNH or Inuyashiki

Attached: my-image.png (1140x1037, 1.78M)

They have even worse stories than black clover. Black clover pulls the rival plot.
Fma is the only well written story with no plot holes and a cohesive narrative. It is objectively perfect.

holy shit taste

>story
Retard can't even read the OP which is about art style
>objectively perfect
My ass.
>cohesive narrative
A lackluster plot that has nothing special going for it

It's objectively garbage.

>rival plot
Yuno can kill himself

Fma is the only shit written story with lots of plot holes and a shitty narrative. It's objectively garbage.

Some of my favs are missing from the selection but here are the standouts in my book.

Attached: s.png (736x94, 153.31K)

>It's called an opinion bud.
yes and a contrarian's """"opinion"""" will always different for the sake of being different.
it's not hard to tell when an opinion isn't genuine.