How did something intentionally non-sexual end up so erotic? how did it backfire?
JK uniforms
Other urls found in this thread:
I thought JK uniforms were intended to be sexual so Japanese boys would be more inclined to do the deed and make babies to help Japan's declining birth rate crisis
JK should be naked
>tfw im
didn't know it'd be funny enough to pasta
They are called skirts user and people like looking up them.
Might be the young, mostly innocent, fertile girls that wear them.
A uniform is much more than a skirt
real school uniforms are ugly, especially modern ones with blazers and ugly sweaters
for me it's bottom, 3rd from the left
There's something about school girls wearing ties that is oddly sexual.
Because it is rare to see Western women wear dresses or skirts instead of jeans or sweat pants
mmm feet
>how did a uniform for females in their prime become sexual
cmon man
you could put em in potato sacks and we'd pop a boner in the grocery store
Bump
Anything that women wear regularly or that is worn exclusive by women, especially young women, will be sexualized (i.e. school uniforms, office suits, pantyhose, high heels, wedding dresses). If said wear is too ugly to be sexualized, we'll just imagine a sexualized version (i.e. nurse uniforms, police uniforms).
For me it's 18
There's only 17 girls in the picture
Is it a crime against humanity that modern males don't get to impregnate fertile teens?
Did you count from left or right?