Why didn't I have a nice girl like this when I was in middle school...

why didn't I have a nice girl like this when I was in middle school. i just had a group of guys that would try to beat the shit out of me every day.

this shit is unrealistic

Attached: S01E01-Eraser Day Duty Funny Face One Hundred Yen [0ECBB77B] - 00_02_53.jpg (1920x1080, 234.58K)

Middle school girls in Japan are cute and nice while in America, they're already rude old bitches.

That group of guys was your Takagi-san. They liked you and expressed it through some teasing

Takagi's feet

Attached: feet.jpg (1920x1080, 213.13K)

Delusional

You understand that anime is an idealized image of Japan and it has nothing to do with reality, right?

>Animu about a girl mentally torturing a retard until he's a broken husk of a man and devotes the rest of his life to maintain her lazy ass.
>Wholesome.
You guys are weird.

Be the girl you want others to be

Are you saying real Japanese middle school girls aren't cute?

2d anime girls >>>>> European 3d women >>>>Japanese 3d women

t. does not watch u-15 gravure

can't wait for your pedo content to be outlawed

Attached: lmao1.png (995x524, 190.5K)

I actually had but she was ugly so I decided to stay virgin instead of pumping and dumping her. I kinda regret it.

How is the US being blamed for "pressuring" Japan to do something that it hasn't even done itself? The US is the only reason Japan even has freedom of speech in its constitution.

>pic
Legalized simple possession of CP does not hurt anyone and decreases sexual abuse against children.
>Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, presented evidence that "[l]egalizing child pornography is linked to lower rates of child sex abuse". Results from the Czech Republic indicated, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, US), that rape and other sex crimes "decreased or essentially remained stable" following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. His research also indicated that the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. The findings support the theory that potential sexual offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex crimes against children. While the authors do not approve of the use of real children in the production or distribution of child pornography, they say that artificially produced materials might serve a purpose.[2]
>Diamond suggests to provide artificially created child pornography that does not involve any real children. His article relayed, "If availability of pornography can reduce sex crimes, it is because the use of certain forms of pornography to certain potential offenders is functionally equivalent to the commission of certain types of sex offences: both satisfy the need for psychosexual stimulants leading to sexual enjoyment and orgasm through masturbation. If these potential offenders have the option, they prefer to use pornography because it is more convenient, unharmful and undangerous (Kutchinsky, 1994, pp. 21)."[2]
Literally statistically proven to be true.

Attached: 1631578765589.jpg (835x1174, 1.04M)

I don't think anyone on Any Forums actually agrees with child porn laws, they just pretend to to get a rise out of people.

Because the United States of America is obviously the most anti-pedo nation in the world? They even have conspiracy theories about satanic reptilian time-traveling child molesters from outer space, and it's also the only country with a publically accessible sex offender registry. They think a 23-year-old dating a 16-year-old is an evil criminal with no redeeming qualities who needs to get castrated or killed. Nobody gave a shit about pedophilia until the late 19th/early 20th century until feminists in the US and the UK decided to raise the age of consent. The spread of Anglo influence is what caused other countries to have harsher age of consent and CP laws.

Attached: 1648825407687.jpg (1200x2104, 228.96K)

>While the authors do not approve of the use of real children in the production or distribution of child pornography
This is the key point here. Loli porn is ultimately not cp and shouldn't be handled as such, it is in no way harmful since it doesn't carry the same baggage actual cp does. Higher demand for cp means a lot more kids will be abused on video, higher demand for loli porn means doujin artists might not die of starvation next winter. Any potential legislation that handles both the same way is fueled by pure, unsubstantiated moral outrage akin to modern music and video games leading to mass shootings.

We all know here loli =/= cp but this board is an echo chamber for these kinds of ideas and won't influence anything, waste of a thread

>Higher demand for cp means a lot more kids will be abused on video
Illegality does not decrease demand. Look at drugs.
Criminalizing the simple possession of anything, whether it be drugs or CP, is objectively tyrannical. The cases of child sex abuse in Japan actually increased after they made the simple possession of CP illegal.
CP is not inherently abusive anyway, as lot of it is filmed by children themselves.

Attached: 1629661952909.jpg (905x1280, 191.12K)

You know in the Netherlands people have literally gone to prison just for saying that sex between adults and children is okay. There are plenty of American laws I don't like, but saying America is the most anti-pedo country is ridiculous.