How the hell was this a WSJ series?

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: 81MO4S0LA6L.jpg (765x1200, 291.9K)

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: hokutonoken.jpg (616x960, 136.21K)

true, too manly

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: imagem_2022-03-20_195021.png (693x1000, 956.62K)

wsj produces anime?

that's a volume cover, dumbass

yes

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: file.png (405x640, 481.2K)

Actually how was this a WSJ series and we haven't had a good giant robot series in Jump since?

Attached: SUPAROBOTTO.png (600x847, 1.05M)

The 80's were a different time for Shonen Jump. We had stuff like Bastard!!! and Saint Seiya, both very bloody and violent series. Even during the 90's we still had that sort of stuff (See: Yu-Gi-Oh!)

modern kids don't like giant robots

Attached: zoomer mecha.jpg (600x720, 176.61K)

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: TLRvol1.jpg (1071x1536, 333.69K)

fuckin zoomers

It's the children who are wrong

I blame gundam for being a fujo pandering franchise(according to it's own creator)

Based Yabuki the master of mirrors

Jump needs some Hard Boiled now.

Attached: 1640153443361.png (1080x1583, 1.44M)

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: sakigake otokojuku.png (340x542, 490.97K)

Jump didn't jump on the romcom train and instead went with manly series.

shut up, tomino

Glad WSJ moved on from these repetitive and formulaic type of manga, that seemed to drag on and on with no clear destination.

How the hell was this a WSJ series?

Attached: DUECDF9XUAA2Fdx.jpg (632x1005, 173.68K)